This one is shorter and vaguer http://dissonance.my3gb.com/mbti.html
Another MBTI Cognitive Functions test
This one is shorter and vaguer http://dissonance.my3gb.com/mbti.html
INFJ INTJ ESFP ESTP
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
I end up putting Ni > Ti = Te, so I've gotten INTJ each time I've taken it. It could be I'm just misunderstanding what it's referring to as inner truth = Ti, because I do relate a lot to Te too.
Also, because this test is vague, it helps to understand what the difference between N-S and T-F is by reading the descriptions of each function just below it. I had a tie between F-T at first, but went back to change it to T because it gave me more information about what the F functions did compared to the T functions, idk sometimes its just the wording. I try not to judge the test questions harshly and just go with the limited information it provides so I'm not biased.
Test is shite. It was designed by a Type Central member with some weird ideas about the functions.
What do these signs mean—,
, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason,
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function(extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
Really? Evan and I met up and talked about MBTI and the functions years back, he seems to have a pretty decent knowledge of it.Originally Posted by Aleksei
I can buy that he has weird ideas about MBTI functions, because this test seemed surprisingly non-MBTI, even Socionics-like (regardless of its limited usefulness) - especially Se/Si. I wouldn't say those definitions are bad, although too vague to be really useful as a test. I like the idea of environmental relevance - I used something akin to that in explaining bodies/fields before.
I ended up with INTJ and ENTP. Surprisingly enough, Ni/Ne one was hardest to interpret, I could twist it either way, though Ni seems closer if I get the right spirit behind those descriptions. I picked Te over Ti.
Heh, this "test" reminds me of the two I took before, I mean one in particular. Anyway, got ESTJ and ENTJ on it.
INTP
F 28%
Fi 11.2%
Fe 16.8%
T 42%
Ti 29.4%
Te 12.6%
N 24%
Ni 8.4%
Ne 15.6%
S 6%
Si 3.6%
Se 2.4%
Test is too transparent to be of much good.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
ENTJ
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote