Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Another MBTI Cognitive Functions test

  1. #1
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Another MBTI Cognitive Functions test

    This one is shorter and vaguer http://dissonance.my3gb.com/mbti.html

  2. #2
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INFJ INTJ ESFP ESTP
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  3. #3
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I end up putting Ni > Ti = Te, so I've gotten INTJ each time I've taken it. It could be I'm just misunderstanding what it's referring to as inner truth = Ti, because I do relate a lot to Te too.

    Also, because this test is vague, it helps to understand what the difference between N-S and T-F is by reading the descriptions of each function just below it. I had a tie between F-T at first, but went back to change it to T because it gave me more information about what the F functions did compared to the T functions, idk sometimes its just the wording. I try not to judge the test questions harshly and just go with the limited information it provides so I'm not biased.

  4. #4
    Bananas are good. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Rift
    TIM
    C-EIE, 7-4-8 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Test is shite. It was designed by a Type Central member with some weird ideas about the functions.
    What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.

    Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).

    For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.

    -Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov

  5. #5
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aleksei View Post
    Test is shite... ...with some weird ideas about the functions.
    Really? Evan and I met up and talked about MBTI and the functions years back, he seems to have a pretty decent knowledge of it.

  6. #6
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can buy that he has weird ideas about MBTI functions, because this test seemed surprisingly non-MBTI, even Socionics-like (regardless of its limited usefulness) - especially Se/Si. I wouldn't say those definitions are bad, although too vague to be really useful as a test. I like the idea of environmental relevance - I used something akin to that in explaining bodies/fields before.

    I ended up with INTJ and ENTP. Surprisingly enough, Ni/Ne one was hardest to interpret, I could twist it either way, though Ni seems closer if I get the right spirit behind those descriptions. I picked Te over Ti.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Heh, this "test" reminds me of the two I took before, I mean one in particular. Anyway, got ESTJ and ENTJ on it.

  8. #8
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTP

    F 28%
    Fi 11.2%
    Fe 16.8%

    T 42%
    Ti 29.4%
    Te 12.6%

    N 24%
    Ni 8.4%
    Ne 15.6%

    S 6%
    Si 3.6%
    Se 2.4%



    Test is too transparent to be of much good.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  9. #9
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENTJ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •