While I'm quite sure now that I'm a Normalizing ILI, (I especially relate to Gulenko's description, it describes my 'rational' traits very well.) I'm not exactly sure about my IE subtype and my dual-type, respectively. Which means INTj vs. INFj. From the dichtotomies alone, I'd say INFj would probably be more accurate, but I don't seem to develop the typical Fi-subtype behaviour as seen below – or at least not consciously. The Ti subtype (as suggested by JohnDo before) on the other handside might explain why many people think I'd be Alpha NT/LII.
There is still a certain chance of me being not N, but H instead. But I rate this chance to be rather unlikely, because I'm not the typical perceiver and a rational subtype seems to be right.Strengthening function gives alarming-over-anxious behavior. This is the primary-axis setting, which does not require formal commitment to traditional rules.
Strengthening function leads to the formation of formal-pedantic behavior. It is secondary in nature in response to the satisfaction of common group needs. It is based on regulation, instruction and official laws.