Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: I don't want to be ISFp anymore

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default I don't want to be ISFp anymore

    I'm going to pretend to be ENTp again. ENTps are WAY cooler than ISFps
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thank god
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  3. #3
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    okay
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  4. #4
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  5. #5
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ahhhhhhhhhh glorious
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  6. #6
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    You need a new hobby

  7. #7
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.S.A
    Posts
    545
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: I don't want to be ISFp anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    I'm going to pretend to be ENTp again. ENTps are WAY cooler than ISFps
    Traiter!! :wink:
    ISFP, SEI

  9. #9
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Traitor*
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  10. #10
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm sorry

    I have this thing with having to be strong and clever and unusual... I really liked being ENTp. *sighs*
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  11. #11
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    6,857
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    I'm sorry

    I have this thing with having to be strong and clever and unusual... I really liked being ENTp. *sighs*
    *Kim is breathing in and out slowly* every.type.can.be.strong.and.clever.and.unusual. *Kim sings a mantra or two for the enlightenment of all who have a weird and dangerous view of Socionics and types*

    Dammit, people, when will you stop being slaves to type descriptions written by random people who perhaps know one or two members of said type and who are probably Ts and have a skewed perception of F-types like most of you T-types here? One type is not stronger than the other (and if I wanted to go by the stereotypes, ENTps aren't even said to be strong, uhm). One type is not more special, one type is not smarter (I cannot believe even that is still floating around), one type is not prettier, etc.

    I think this CONSTANT bullshit is really what has been making me so irritable around these quarters lately....
    “Let us forget with generosity those who cannot love us”
    ― Pablo Neruda

  12. #12
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    *applauds*
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  13. #13
    Creepy-aurora_faerie

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    I'm sorry

    I have this thing with having to be strong and clever and unusual... I really liked being ENTp. *sighs*

    You can be that way and ISFp at the same time...

  14. #14
    schrödinger's cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    1,186
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kim, I see your point. At the same time, people sometimes treat you as if you were a clichée [insert type here]. Heck, sometimes we even treat ourselves like that. I've observed that folks who declared themselves to be another type suddenly started to act different, as if saying "I'm an xNTx" frees them to actually develop theories, and saying "I'm ENFp" frees your whackiness, etc. So, in that context, why not be another type for a while? Perhaps it's about saying yes to one's inner ENTPity. You're ENTP for a while, take a deep breath, "wow, that felt good!" and then snuggle up into being an ISFP again. (Not that ISFPs are per definitionem snuggly. I meant "snuggle up" in the sense of "home sweet home").

    I was on the slippery slope towards saying ENTPness. Note how I slammed my brakes and skidded to a halt just in time.

  15. #15
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim

    Dammit, people, when will you stop being slaves to type descriptions written by random people who perhaps know one or two members of said type and who are probably Ts and have a skewed perception of F-types like most of you T-types here? One type is not stronger than the other (and if I wanted to go by the stereotypes, ENTps aren't even said to be strong, uhm). One type is not more special, one type is not smarter (I cannot believe even that is still floating around), one type is not prettier, etc.

    I think this CONSTANT bullshit is really what has been making me so irritable around these quarters lately....

    Kim, I totally agree, but what you also need to realize is that there's a feeling that goes along with identifying a type that can give confidence in certain areas of stereotypical strength of that type to the person who believes that he/she is it. I think Cat pretty much nailed it, but I felt like it had to be said another way.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  16. #16
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schrödinger's cat
    Kim, I see your point. At the same time, people sometimes treat you as if you were a clichée [insert type here]. Heck, sometimes we even treat ourselves like that. I've observed that folks who declared themselves to be another type suddenly started to act different, as if saying "I'm an xNTx" frees them to actually develop theories, and saying "I'm ENFp" frees your whackiness, etc. So, in that context, why not be another type for a while? Perhaps it's about saying yes to one's inner ENTPity. You're ENTP for a while, take a deep breath, "wow, that felt good!" and then snuggle up into being an ISFP again. (Not that ISFPs are per definitionem snuggly. I meant "snuggle up" in the sense of "home sweet home").

    I was on the slippery slope towards saying ENTPness. Note how I slammed my brakes and skidded to a halt just in time.

    I tried to warn you guys what imaging was =/

  17. #17
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah so I'm ENTp again

    no, not really
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  18. #18
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    yeah so I'm ENTp again

    no, not really
    nope
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  19. #19
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    fine, I'll just be typeless again
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it's possible to explore different type modes; different configurations of functions aren't as inaccessible as Model A would make it seem. So, now in your ENTp life, tell us some wild ENTp ideas.

  21. #21
    schrödinger's cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    1,186
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadae
    I tried to warn you guys what imaging was =/
    Quote Originally Posted by techtarget.com
    Imaging is the capture, storage, manipulation, and display of images.
    ?

  22. #22
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan
    I think it's possible to explore different type modes; different configurations of functions aren't as inaccessible as Model A would make it seem. So, now in your ENTp life, tell us some wild ENTp ideas.
    I can't explore other type models... because I can't afford so much time or attention to socionics. At the end of the day, I do not fit into any of the 16 types more than say... 75%. This is because of environmental factors primarily, and at the end of the day, it effectively means that I am no longer any of the types for any functional purpose. Whatever type I once was is lost, and it's just as well.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can't explore other type models... because I can't afford so much time or attention to socionics. At the end of the day, I do not fit into any of the 16 types more than say... 75%. This is because of environmental factors primarily, and at the end of the day, it effectively means that I am no longer any of the types for any functional purpose. Whatever type I once was is lost, and it's just as well.
    I can identify with that; I feel the same way. What I meant though wasn't exploring other type models (i.e., other theories) but exploring other type modes (i.e., going into various states of mind where you're similar to a different type, even if you're not aware of it).

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    100
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's impossible to change our information metabolism type. It's build in our brains!!! A type is just a vague description of information processing components the human brain has and how they work. Now, I don't know and I can't say if it's true or not and in what terms it's so or not so, but if something is a part of you physicaly, then it can't change unless you cut it or remove it from your body. If sociotypes describe information metabolism in a human brain, and if a type relates to exact parts of the brain, then it's possible to change the type by removing one of these parts (from your brain by cutting it out).
    For example, several parts of the brain process "smell data", so if you remove one of these parts, your information metabolism changes from ISTP to ENFJ, for example. PPP

    What a stupid idea.
    drake
    --Dilemmas are illusions.

  25. #25
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by schrödinger's cat
    Quote Originally Posted by Jadae
    I tried to warn you guys what imaging was =/
    Quote Originally Posted by techtarget.com
    Imaging is the capture, storage, manipulation, and display of images.
    ?
    LOL! No. Imaging is a type of social modeling. When you see the word imaging in social sceince then it is referring to what Im talking about.... not the latest function on your digicam lol.

  26. #26
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drake
    It's impossible to change our information metabolism type. It's build in our brains!!! A type is just a vague description of information processing components the human brain has and how they work. Now, I don't know and I can't say if it's true or not and in what terms it's so or not so, but if something is a part of you physicaly, then it can't change unless you cut it or remove it from your body. If sociotypes describe information metabolism in a human brain, and if a type relates to exact parts of the brain, then it's possible to change the type by removing one of these parts (from your brain by cutting it out).
    For example, several parts of the brain process "smell data", so if you remove one of these parts, your information metabolism changes from ISTP to ENFJ, for example. PPP

    What a stupid idea.
    It is already psychologically and biologically proven that the brain IS plastic. It changes throughout time and does not always hit a set pattern. This is the flaw of any theory that uses dualism as it's base. Dualism fails to recognize time. It is far too absolute to recognize exterior data.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •