View Poll Results: Which nominees are not good representatives of the ILI type?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • Stanley Kubrick

    8 38.10%
  • Neo

    12 57.14%
  • Jimi Hendrix

    12 57.14%
  • Meg Ryan

    13 61.90%
  • Jane Austen

    9 42.86%
  • Isaac Newton

    7 33.33%
  • River Tam

    10 47.62%
  • The Architect

    13 61.90%
  • Niels Bohr

    4 19.05%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: New Type Reps for ILI -- Round 1

  1. #1
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,647
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default New Type Reps. for ILI -- Round 1

    If you've not done so, please read this thread first.

    In this poll, please select all the nominees that you think are not fit to represent the ILI type. This would include nominees that you don't think are ILI, as well as nominees that you agree are ILI, but you don't think are good representatives of the type for one reason or another.
    Quaero Veritas.

  2. #2
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jimi Hendrix? Interesting.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  3. #3
    Bananas are good. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Rift
    TIM
    C-EIE, 7-4-8 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    bump
    What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.

    Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).

    For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.

    -Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •