New Type Reps. for LII -- Round 1
If you've not done so, please read this thread first.
In this poll, please select all the nominees that you think are not fit to represent the LII type. This would include nominees that you don't think are LII, as well as nominees that you agree are LII, but you don't think are good representatives of the type for one reason or another.
Quaero Veritas.
First round byes?
So what if I hate all of the options?
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
You'll just have to hope someone more credible and worthy like René is used and not left out on the grounds that he is old news or some such.
René's not on YouTube, though.
He might be the LII, but should these reps be observable? (...VI-able?)
Not really. I would think the project is attempting to find the people whose personalities best represent each type.Originally Posted by CILi
lulz misread poll
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Same. Did it for about 5 polls.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
I'm not sure ANY of those are LIIs.
I don't know who most of these people are, but I think Spock and Jung are horrible choices. I doubt Jung is LII and Spock from Star Trek XI is not a clear type in my opinion. I thought his character concept and that of the Vulcans was poorly done indeed.
PS: I failed to notice Mr. Darcy was on the list, and I would definitely vote "no" on that one. Oops didn't notice Fred Burkle either (another "no"). I guess I do know who most of these people are. Whatever.
Last edited by marooned; 11-16-2010 at 04:38 AM.
Yes, obviously Jay-Z should be used as the measure of all things LII.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Just a quick point...In a survey like this, you might want to use all capital letters in the word "NOT" <--- Like this.
Otherwise, it's hard to see how many of the votes are due to people who read the question properly, and how many are due to people who read the question in the opposite way.
(Of course given that most of the people listed had a high number of votes and are probably not LIIs, that would indicate that maybe most people are reading it the correct way. Still, it's a bit of a confusing question because one's eye can skip over the "not" very easily.)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote