For the Heck of It

[Cuddly McFluffles]

I don't put much faith in VI, but for the hell of it, here you go.

[Trevor]

I can see EII.

[silverchris9]

I was gonna say ESI based on VI alone.

[Beautiful sky]

SEE

Does she look like she's cold and distant? or Socially selective?

[CILi]

(Also for the heck of it,) Fi-something.

ESI just barely over EII. (Though you kinda post more the latter.)

Does she look like she's...socially selective?

What does that look like?

[Absurd]

What does that look like?

Maritsa looks like she's deported from her home Planet - that's selective.

[Words]

ESXp leaning towards ESTp imo.

[Creepy-Snaps]

SEE

Does she look like she's cold and distant? or Socially selective?

I see socially selective, yes. I think SEI.

Definitely NOT EII or ESI like others have said. Her smile is way too warm, open, and natural to have Fi dominant. The strict*ethics dichotomy just doesn't fit with her.

ESXp leaning towards ESTp imo.

I can also see her being a T.

I agree with Maritsa and Words; overall, she's definitely some kind of XSXp. And I'm leaning towards ISFp.

*Edit* Or, thinking about it a bit more, the only non-XSXp I could consider is INTj. And it's still just VI, so take it with a grain of salt.

[DirectorAbbie]

Sorry; I'm not familiar with any people who look like you, so I'm not one to judge.

[Marie84]

EII? But maybe I'm being biased since you look a bit like a blackish version of me

Definitely NOT EII or ESI like others have said. Her smile is way too warm, open, and natural to have Fi dominant. The strict*ethics dichotomy just doesn't fit with her.

in dominants is still a strong function. ignoring basically means that an EII/ESI will generally not contribute to the emotional atmosphere if it conflicts with their sentiments, which can be intensified if they're amongst people whom they dislike/make them uncomfortable, in other words, Fi is the priority, not Fe.
If an EII/ESI is in a good mood/comfortable/amongst people they like there's no reason why they can't show a degree of positive emotions, it just appears naturally, thus you smile because you feel a burst of happiness, rather than smiling for the sake of not bringing down the mood of the people around you (I think this is even intensified in ESI's, who may outright looked P.O.ed, where as an EII may just come across as placid)
Of course, though, those emotions won't generally be as vivid as an actual Fe types, or even IEE/SEE's, and I don't think Ryene Astraelis's pics come across as particularly colorful displays of Fe

[Krig the Viking]

I don't put much faith in VI, but for the hell of it, here you go.

I had it narrowed down to INFx, before I accidentally glanced at your self-typing and biased myself.

As usual, I agree with Marie.

[yellow82]

Your facial expressions look like my best friend Whitney.

She is an INFj.

But I really know nothing about VI so don't take me too seriously.

[717495]

Yeah, definitely INFj.

Definitely NOT EII or ESI like others have said. Her smile is way too warm, open, and natural to have Fi dominant. The strict*ethics dichotomy just doesn't fit with her.

Ugh.

[Words]

In picture 3 you remind me of an SLE I knew years ago (she was 21 at the time I knew her).

Also, picture 3 - my impression is that you look like you can be rather aggressive and confrontational, you don't look like the sort of character easily intimidated from a fight or someone shouting at you, not what I associate with weak Se.

[Cuddly McFluffles]

Interesting experiment. Thanks to everyone for the feedback. ExI seems plausible enough. I might consider SEE, but SLE is out of the question. As much as I prefer to keep my statements open-ended, my gut reaction is to say that there is a snowball's chance in hell of my being polr.