Last edited by Vois; 05-19-2014 at 12:30 AM.
entp of course
fatti non foste a viver come bruti ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza
I agree with EyeSeeCold. ILI or ILE, leaning towards ILI.
EII - INTj - Dostoyevsky -
No, it's not a typo!
Group interaction vs one on one.
Fi valuers, I think, tend to want one on one conversations rather than group discussions. With Fe types you get the energy flowing around, with an ILI in the mix, the circulating energy would die instantly lol. The ILE would probably try to increase the energy with jokes, eccentric behavior or whatever.
Hm. It might be that he's -valuing, since supposedly -PoLR manifests as wanting to give off as few emotional cues as possible. His unintentional facial expressions may just be a part of how he speaks or expresses himself and it may happen so naturally he doesn't even realize he does it any more. Or it may be that he has very poor control of his facial expressions and is letting out more cues than he realizes...
But the getting embarrassed when he doesn't know a word sounds like -HA's manifestation of "I must understand things and be smart or else I'm a deficient human being." Though it could also just be an ILE's -creativity...
Additionally, your first paragraph makes it sound like he has weak or devalued usage of . Which means that he might be -PoLR and have a very poor grasp of where he stands with people, or it might mean that he's -creative and prefers interacting that way over ...
Maybe. I guess. Kind of.
Geez, that was no help whatsoever! Food for thought I suppose.
Please, direct all questioning of my self-typing to this thread. Thank you.
None of the information you have offered helps indicate the person's type.
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions: