Vicky Jo

[ashlesha]

an MBTI practitioner who types INFJ in myers briggs and maintains the websites:

I N F J

INFJ or INFP? a closer look

[717495]

Not sure, perhaps Beta.

[somavision]

I took a mild disliking to her in the first second of this video...
"hey you" is far too familiar for my liking, and in the context seems condescending. I also don't like her dress or hair.
As such any further attempts to form a judgement have been tainted by this.
I'll watch later after I've recovered from my shock and disgust, for now I'll type her as a seemingly condescending annoying person.

Addendum:

I don't like the way she sits in her chair or the way it's positioned against the wall - I don't like the composition or framing of the video. I really dislike her dress. And there is something unsettling about it along with her smug self satisfied smile.

Vicky Joe, I don't like your clothes, your hair, your smile or your video. Vicky Joe, I don't like you.... or your body language.

I see a lot of Vicky Joe in me.

[The Exception]

I'll watch later after I've recovered from my shock and disgust, for now I'll type her as a seemingly condescending annoying person.

I guess I'm not the only one who got that impression. I was previously on a forum where she posted and I got the idea that she was more interested in her own self-promotion then in genuienly wanting to help others understanding themselves. I just got the impression she was rather self-righteous and too sure her impressions of others were right.


Socionics wise, I'd say beta NF, leaning toward EIE.

[ashlesha]

lol i'm loving these responses.

[DividedsGhost]

She doesn't really annoy me. She tends to talk about herself mostly and I understand that that is usually annoying too many people.

But she sounds Fe-base/Fi-ignoring. I saw some of her videos along time ago when I was looking into the MBTI system and she often displayed the ESE Te role function of needing to make everything into a very kind of explicit logic. This often makes them look condescending to others as if they deserve that everything be fully explained with every detail as if they can't be bothered to think for themselves. But their interpretation is that they really just don't understand and need the details...or something.

But anyway, she seems ESE to me more than anything else.

[Marie84]

after watching that, probably IEI; she comes across as overtly introspective but also rather flighty and concerned with Fe external projections with all the gesticulating and melodic way of speaking

[Nowisthetime]

I've watched a lot of her videos lately. I think she's EIE.

Interesting video where she claims she's having an INFJ-INFJ diskussion. Woman to the right is in fact EII, I would say. But Vicky is EIE.





(Her husband is probably LII, they are semiduals. He is in some videos.)

Vicky + husband:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDnms...ature=youtu.be

[Galen]

I've looked at her before, and INFp seems reasonable. No opinion on her husband though.

[noid]

ENFj or INFp imo. Im french so I dont understand all wtf she speak about, but the vibe I get from her is more ENFj. So ENFj-Ni or INFp-Fe.

[noid]

the guy she interview is strongly INFp -

[silke]

Fe-INFp e1 imho

... I just got the impression she was rather self-righteous and too sure her impressions of others were right.

that's a common impression people get from her videos, she tends to come off as pushy with her views and her gesturing borders on aggressive at times

[Absurd]

Fe-INFp e1 imho

An irrational type being E1, priceless.

[silke]

An irrational type being E1, priceless.

since when irrational cannot be type 1?

[Absurd]

since when irrational cannot be type 1?

By the same reasoning DA, Bardia, discojoe to name a few being E1 and rational types are, in fact, irrational types ? Furthermore, what's the point in assigning socionics types to enneagram types, in other words, what's the point in arguing this and that socionics type can't or can be this and that enneagram type ?

You did all on this forum a favour stating E1 can be a irrational type in socionics, that is, you put and end to this discussion. You're IEI, have you typed a SLE you know E1 ?

[silke]

By the same reasoning DA, Bardia, discojoe to name a few being E1 and rational types are, in fact, irrational types ?

You did all on this forum a favour stating E1 can be a irrational type in socionics, that is, you put and end to this discussion. You're IEI, have you typed a SLE you know E1 ?

There is no connection between rationality/irrationality and enneagram. The fact that some rational types are e1 doesn't mean irrational cannot be e1. The fact that some rationals type as 1 doesn't mean that they are irrationals.

Haven't met a SLE 1 yet but IEIs e1 sure.

Furthermore, what's the point in assigning socionics types to enneagram types, in other words, what's the point in arguing this and that socionics type can't or can be this and that enneagram type

Enneagram types are usually used to explain some of the more minute differences between identicals. There is no point in arguing about it just that the connection you made between rationality/irrationality and enneagram typings seemed weird to me.

[Absurd]

There is no connection between rationality/irrationality and enneagram. The fact that some rational types are e1 doesn't mean irrational cannot be e1. The fact that some rationals type as 1 doesn't mean that they are irrationals.

Alright, you're shooting other people's ideas down right now, carefully woven web of correlating socionics types to enneagram and vice versa, broken, eh

Haha.

Haven't met a SLE 1 yet but IEIs e1 sure.

That's great.

There is no point in arguing about it just that the connection you made between rationality/irrationality and enneagram typings seemed weird to me.

I didn't do anything, just reading this board, enneagram subforum, for instance, one learns a lot of things. I do not come up with things, I just use them, that's a big difference.