Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Combinations of Elements

  1. #1
    Board philosopher or bored philosopher? jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    884
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Combinations of Elements...

    Am I imagining things? Is there something different about socionics in Europe as opposed to North America?

    I sometimes see elements combined around here (Canada) in weird ways, by socionics standards:

    - "Business systems."
    - "Organizational hierarchies."
    - "This house needs more structure - so we can be more productive, efficient, and effective!"
    - "Business solutions."
    - A filing "system."
    - "Systems science" (e.g, engineering systems).

    ( + ?)

    Elements of logical structure sometimes deal more with building things and businesses than theory, and I wonder if this is different in Eastern Europe.

    Also:

    - "Dude, go F**CK yourself! hahaha. lol."
    - "Woah man, chill out. It's p-a-t-h-e-t-i-c that you are this sad."
    - "I was hanging out, so relaxed, and then I saw her t*ts."
    - I even have a friend who spends a lot of time at bars. I see him wearing gawdy night club clothing one night, then, a t-shirt that says "Mr. Lazy" another. (And he is a very laid-back guy.)

    If you compare this with words:

    - "Are you sh*tting me?"
    - "Stand up for yourself - beetch!"
    - "I'm getting laid tonight, f**ggots..."
    - etc...,

    then perhaps a lot of vocabulary is being combined with vocabulary.

    Do you think that maybe Ethical and sensing types become more -valuing here? Perhaps more in bigger cities as well...

    Just a theory, but worth wondering about...
    Last edited by jason_m; 11-03-2010 at 10:29 AM.
    LII

  2. #2
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post

    I sometimes see elements combined around here in weird ways, by socionics standards:

    then perhaps a lot of vocabulary is being combined with vocabulary.

    Just a theory, but worth wondering about...
    and are on the same energy level, so it's not really surprising that one can be manifested through the other.

    I think examples of +, weird as they may be, are the architectural network designs that provide optimal speed, Fiber to the X, for instance.

    I don't know what was your intent, but it's not impossible to combine them when not working with Socionics.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  3. #3
    Board philosopher or bored philosopher? jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    884
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EDIT: sorry - it might not have been made clear by my post. By HERE I mean North America.
    LII

  4. #4
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,860
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So called socionics vocabulary is BS anyway.

    So what if it might be loosely correlated with certain elements under certain contexts. If it doesn't point out at elements in 1:1 or almost 1:1 fashion I am not interested. And it sure doesn't correlate that well. I am interested, though. Interested in fighting against it.

    Things correlating with something are not neccessarily that something even if there is like bunch of them and they all stink.

  5. #5
    I'm a Ti-Te! Skeptic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    US
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trevor View Post
    So called socionics vocabulary is BS anyway.

    So what if it might be loosely correlated with certain elements under certain contexts. If it doesn't point out at elements in 1:1 or almost 1:1 fashion I am not interested. And it sure doesn't correlate that well. I am interested, though. Interested in fighting against it.

    Things correlating with something are not neccessarily that something even if there is like bunch of them and they all stink.
    So what that exists right now describes elements in a 1:1 fashion? Surely not wikisocion because that's already known to be tainted by english speakers' bias and is known to even derivate from traditional Russian socionics, but even then Russian socionics can be generally debated and different.

  6. #6
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,860
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeptic View Post
    So what that exists right now describes elements in a 1:1 fashion?
    Fakk me if I know. It sure ain't socionics vocabulary.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •