Jamie Oliver

[Not A Communist Shill]

I recently typed him LSE based on very little, and then found out that I had typed him this way several years ago. I suppose based on how I usually type compared to other people that ESE might be a possibility.

[Aiss]

I thought Delta Extrovert before.

[Park]

Ridiculously un-intuitive. ESE could work.

[Marie84]

I thought ESE but I'm not against LSE as an alternative

[somethingsomething]

is that the cook from oliver's twist? he's really cute lol. He got mentioned in some fashion magazines for his style and he's married with babies! Oh yes and his type...he does seem more sensory to me, and maybe an introverted sensor because he has such a personal style of clothing

[Words]

ESE or SEE?

[Sol]

ENTP

[The Ineffable]

This will be easy.

[Amber]

Fi creative

[The Ineffable]

Why Fi? And, separately, why not Si?

[wacey]

I see him as an easy Si-LSE.

[Velvet]

Looks more Si than Se

[Beautiful sky]

SLI

[Olly From Wally World]

You niggaz think every chef is an ego. I bet no one here can muster an argument for , I almost wonder if anyone watched the interview or just started salivating when they saw the pasta and thought "mmmmmm, he must be a caregiver."

Anyways, idk for sure but they are both intuitives. Letterman is doing what ILI's do, shutting down improbable ventures and telling the guy his visions won't come to pass because of all the technical aspects he seems unaware of. This guy doesn't care about his , actually seemed a bit bothered by Letterman as he wanted encouragement, not criticism, to the point where Letterman says, before they get into their convo about 'food revolution', "You're not really mad at me, you can't be mad at me because I'm right and you're doing what you can do to fight this." (What ILI hasn't said something like this, lol?) sorta showing something went down, maybe that he hit his super ego at some point in time. To which he says he isnt mad but just wanted encouragement from him. He's focused on his grand prospects and doesn't value and, listen to him, he is more focused on changing the public and the people in order to attain his vision, which seems more Beta to me but so far I'm more so sure of valuing intuitive, he works off of the crowd's energy and keeps getting applause also despite his vision's impracticality which I also see in beta NF's. I want to consider alpha partially too though but I'm probably right.

[The Ineffable]

Shut up, Jamie Oliver is Fe-Base. I would not exclude EIE - my first typing on him - just my current typing is ESE.

[woofwoofl]

You niggaz think every chef is an ego. I bet no one here can muster an argument for , I almost wonder if anyone watched the interview or just started salivating when they saw the pasta and thought "mmmmmm, he must be a caregiver."

Anyways, idk for sure but they are both intuitives.

Maybe no one can muster an argument for Si, but extrotim/rational/dynamic (EJ) is the most sensible temperament, due to consistently high energy levels. Semblance to EP temperament (flexibility, bounciness, easy-going stability) exists more in the positivist/result/narrative sections of the EJ ring than the stiffer negativist/process/asking areas, and going with Fe base leaves only ESE.

Letterman is doing what ILI's do, shutting down improbable ventures and telling the guy his visions won't come to pass because of all the technical aspects he seems unaware of. This guy doesn't care about his , actually seemed a bit bothered by Letterman as he wanted encouragement, not criticism, to the point where Letterman says, before they get into their convo about 'food revolution', "You're not really mad at me, you can't be mad at me because I'm right and you're doing what you can do to fight this." (What ILI hasn't said something like this, lol?) sorta showing something went down, maybe that he hit his super ego at some point in time. To which he says he isnt mad but just wanted encouragement from him. He's focused on his grand prospects and doesn't value and, listen to him, he is more focused on changing the public and the people in order to attain his vision, which seems more Beta to me but so far I'm more so sure of valuing intuitive, he works off of the crowd's energy and keeps getting applause also despite his vision's impracticality which I also see in beta NF's. I want to consider alpha partially too though but I'm probably right.

I've went with SLI for Dave, and with Jamie as ESE, supervision makes sense (especially given the movie title "Jamie Oliver owns David Letterman").

[wacey]

^ Hah!