VI this friend-o-mine
I went to high school with her. The only thing I can be sure of is that she is ethical and probably extroverted. Other than that, she responds positively when you bluntly ask her rude questions, like when I randomly asked her if she was still a virgin.
ENTp?
ISFp
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
"oh, honey child... that's been gone."Originally Posted by Pied Piper
Removed at User Request
Except I'm nothing like an SEE.
Removed at User Request
LOL! That's what happens what one drinks too much coffee.
DJ, obey!
Removed at User Request
Yawn! You're so sensitive, I was only trying to get a reaction out of you on ananke's thread, I wasn't serious as you might think.
Removed at User Request
Well, you weren't compelled to answer to me in the first place.
I usually don't argue regarding types because I know it's pointless, people have their own screwed, sometimes right opinions and you can't change them. And unlike you, I don't want to change the opinions of others, I don't take it too seriously btw. I just say what I have to say. I'm sorry I VIed those persons differently, what can I say? And I already told you, I don't know shit about socionics.
But from what I know, it seems you (internet) socionics guys are at least half delusional.
Removed at User Request
@PP:
Yeah, you can call me stupid directly, don't bother. Imagine how bad it is to be a "less intelligent" LII, according to you. And I never presented my type and preferences here, at 16types, or anywhere else, as far as I remember.
I have a little interest in socionics, that's all.
Regarding my type's assessment (at least), keep in mind that you're delusional.
Thanks for answering. I'll withdraw from the discussion here.
Last edited by neverthesame; 09-24-2010 at 05:54 PM.
Removed at User Request
more like ESI.Hehe, sounds like having some school behind.
Btw of the OP, discojoe, your friend (I don't recall her username right now) last time said that you're usually polite apart for people that suck or something, but now (as usually) you were rude on purpose. You know the questions are rude but put them nevertheless, unlike LSI, though.
You're SEE man, wake up!
I do agree that he is not LSI, but discojoe = SEE? While him being LSI still makes a little sense, SEE doesn't make ANY sense AT ALL!
So far I think he is either ESI > LSE > LII > LSI.
And whatever type he actually is, one I am sure of - an unhealthy type!
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
And the girl is some ethical irrational. INFp > ISFp > ESFp > ENFp
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
Anyone who thinks I am a type other than LSI is horrible at Socionics.
I agree she is probably IEI. I want to fuck her.
fuck you
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
If that's what you mean by preferences.
Do you even realize you can't tell the difference between your own opinions and "the truth"?
Removed at User Request
Reply With Quote
