Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 119

Thread: LSI-SLE Mirror relations (ISTj and ESTp)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default LSI-SLE Mirror relations (ISTj and ESTp)

    It's interesting, the difference between mirrors. SLEs are very impulsive, yet they wade through their impulsiveness within improvisational logical frameworks. This tends to lend them short term success, because their recklessness is tempered by what I would call acceptable reason, a kind of disposable set of rules and justifications that aids them in the imposition of their Se agenda. I envy them this ability, but I think they often (not always) pay for this in the long run by not considering the social ramifications of their behavior. They start making enemies and eventually something career-ending or job-ending happens to them and they and their family are left disgraced. To the SLE, power and prestige, to varying degrees, of course, are themselves the goal, and the implementation, the Ti, is merely the tool.

    LSIs are much more subdued and socially proper in their approach. They tend not to actively push social boundaries the way that SLEs do. Instead, they pursue the implementation/maintenance of their subjective, systematic concept of reality, then rigidly yet gradually impose this framework onto society. The gradual nature of this approach means that LSIs are less likely than SLEs to attain short term "victories," which SLEs flaunt flamboyantly in an effort to win over the opposite sex. However, I think the gradual, socially conscientious approach to goal implementation by the LSI means that they will often (not always) more reliably acquire power, albeit at the expense of short term gains. For instance, people will laugh at the LSI at first, for being too boring, too traditional in their approach. But ten, twenty, thirty years later, the LSI, seemingly out of nowhere is the one who has the power. The LSI's downfall is that they will often act impulsively and recklessly when they perceive an opportunity to acquire power (and thus the ability to further implement their world view). For instance, an LSI may stage a coup and then be killed himself when one of his allies unexpectedly betrays him.

    I know this is all Socionics 101, but I felt like writing about it.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ahh, just realized the topic title is misleading. It should instead say "SLE/LSI differences" or something.

  3. #3
    strrrng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    very accurate

  4. #4
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by strrrng View Post
    very accurate
    Accuracy is concern with Te, how can you say that and be "Te PoLR"?

  5. #5
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The downfall of LSI you wrote sounds like the strength of SLE and LSI fails when they start acting SLE.
    Perhaps some Se-LSI but generally
    No
    The downfall is when they miss free oppurtunites (Ne) outside the rules that they follow to achieve power and thus get left behind suddenly, especially when chaotic events happen.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jughead View Post
    The downfall is when they miss free oppurtunites (Ne) outside the rules that they follow to achieve power and thus get left behind suddenly, especially when chaotic events happen.
    Actually, that's just another way of looking at what I said about the LSI's downfall. Just as the LSI will act without considering the consequences, he will also not act in situations in which he fails to consider the consequences of his inertia. It's the two sides of the Ne PoLR (at least when it comes to action).

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Hilarious - dynamic between ISTj and ESTp mirrors

    The dynamic between my SLE friend and I is exactly the same as between Kirk and Spock. The chemistry and friction. It's hilarious. I'll post some stuff later.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    The dynamic between my SLE friend and I is exactly the same as between Kirk and Spock. The chemistry and friction. It's hilarious. I'll post some stuff later.
    Post a vid of you and him making out in bed covered with red rose petals.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some Beta people, please read all of this and tell me if it sounds like mirrors.



    SLE: are there more sexier words that can be murmured from a woman none other than "i want you to cum inside of me?"
    discojoe: Yes
    discojoe: "stop"
    SLE:

    discojoe: Well you made the lolz mistake of getting engaged.
    discojoe: Worst thing I ever did
    discojoe: I'm technically married still
    SLE: i lol at the social structure of relationships, as well as people's views on them
    SLE: i feel like i just make up my own interpretation of everything, and this satisfies me
    discojoe: Whatever engulfs your cock in vagina fluid
    SLE: male biological clock?
    SLE: i think so
    SLE: or chemically imbalanced id?
    discojoe: Id? Depends on how far you let loose.
    discojoe: We should kill Kelly's boyfriend and turn it into a murder mystery for her to try to solve. All the evidence will point to her and she'll turn herself in.
    SLE: she would believe it


    discojoe: Ok, tell him all this shit
    discojoe: And if he keeps it up
    discojoe: Stop talking to him
    SLE: in his recent trend of things, he started accusing me of potentially being uh......
    discojoe: No need to expose yourself to a negative influence
    SLE: hold on
    SLE: stop talking
    discojoe: k
    SLE: i need to fully explain this
    SLE: and im getting super tired so its getting harder to
    SLE: cause i want to respond but cant
    SLE: anyway
    SLE: he was accusing me of being ....
    SLE: i cant think of the fucking term atm
    SLE: its when you have 2 personalities, and people think you are psychotic
    SLE: but its not uncommon
    discojoe: >_> Finished?
    SLE: no, i need your help
    SLE: trying to remember this
    SLE: not schizo, but
    SLE: uh
    discojoe: dissociative or w/e
    discojoe: Where you go into a dissociative state and kill people etc
    SLE: no not that
    SLE: im asking *name removed*
    SLE: cause i told her about it back then
    SLE: WHY CANT I FUCKING REMEMBER THIS FUCKING SHIT
    SLE: FUCK
    SLE: IM FUCKING TIRED


    SLE: oh btw, id like to make a note of how useless the psychologist was here....
    discojoe: Go ahead
    SLE: i went in to talk with him about it, and he went on a 45 minute tangent about how he thinks that donald trump is going to be the next president
    SLE: the end
    discojoe: lmao



    Here's the important bit. Note how surprised he is to encounter someone else with articulated Beta values.


    SLE: i honestly believe i am a polygamist
    SLE: i have seriously considered being in love with more than one woman at a time
    discojoe: There's nothing inherently wrong with any of this
    discojoe: The only thing that would be unethical
    discojoe: Is if you did something that you felt wasn't worth the price you'd pay.
    discojoe: Don't go against your value
    SLE: but dude
    SLE: i HATE the common view people have on morality (or as you're calling them "ethics") in this case
    SLE: and im talking in terms of relationships
    discojoe: I know
    discojoe: What I am saying
    discojoe: Is that you have a vested interest in your own happiness
    discojoe: And that you need to make sure you aren't compromising it by doing something based solely on temptation
    discojoe: If your fiance makes you happy, then don't compromise it by engaging in inappropriate behavior with someone who endangers your higher valued person.
    discojoe: Think of these moral dilemmas as transactions
    SLE: this is something that i cannot agree on, but yet i respect
    SLE: maybe its just me
    SLE: and this is exactly what a lot of people do not understand about me
    SLE: but then again, its not like ive tried to explain it to a ton of people either
    discojoe: Will you be happy cheating on your fiance?
    SLE: to me, there is literally no such terminology as cheating
    SLE: there is a social accepted standard of cheating
    discojoe: Ok, then will you be happy sleeping with this girl while being in a relationship with your fiance?
    SLE: i would see no problem in it at all
    discojoe: But would it make you happy? Think about it carefully.
    SLE: (for my own vested interest)
    SLE: it would make me happy because i enjoy the rush of getting to know someone, also too i genuinely care for this girl
    discojoe: If sleeping with her would result in a net increase in your happiness, then do it.
    discojoe: If this is the way you are, then it would be unethical to deprive yourself of what makes you happy.
    SLE: but heres the conflict:
    SLE: i do know that if my fiance found out about ANY of this, she'd be hurt beyond belief
    SLE: and in that regard in and of itself, i'd try to prevent that to the best of my ability, out of my love for her
    SLE: i dont want to hurt her
    discojoe: Ok, this is what I am getting at
    discojoe: Is sleeping with this girl going to make you NET happier. Meaning, will the happiness you get from sleeping with her make up for the grief of hurting your fiance.
    discojoe: Of potentially hurting her, rather
    SLE: in this scenario, are you suggesting that my fiance would infact know about the roommate situation?
    discojoe: No, but it depends on the odds.
    discojoe: If the odds are more than 10%, I don't think you'd be happy risking it.
    SLE: to me, it depends on how much of a loose cannon my roommate is
    SLE: and my roommate has an active sexual relationship right now with a married man, and she keeps her mouth shut about it
    discojoe: Um, then don't do it.
    SLE: nono
    SLE: what im saying is, she ISNT
    SLE: if she was a loose cannon, then fuck no
    discojoe: Ohh
    discojoe: Fine, then do it if you think you can keep it a secret
    SLE: so what im getting at is that i have vested trust in her
    discojoe: But remember the pain if your fiance finds out. Let that motivate you into being hyper-precautious
    SLE: exactly
    SLE: actually you know waht, this is fucking fantastic
    SLE: this is the first time that anyone has actually CLEARLY fucking understood how i stand on this situation
    discojoe: Well I'm special.
    discojoe: So go ahead, but remember to buckle up, as it were.


    discojoe: I guarantee you can basically have her if
    discojoe: First, you start approaching the situation from a "You're mine and I won't stop" perspective.
    SLE: i like this idea, however i already feel like she will resist that from my "prior engagement" (literally)
    discojoe: Ohhh
    discojoe: Yeah break up with your fiance
    SLE: uh
    discojoe: Yeah, bold words huh
    SLE: this is the first time the thought has crossed my mind
    SLE: at the moment, im having a mental strife because i truthfully believe you, but by the same token its making me dislike this feeling (and dislike you)
    SLE: its not actually personal
    SLE: its just that ive been in a state of comfort
    SLE: and you're breaking me freee from my comfrort
    SLE: and from what kelly has told me about this socionics stuff
    SLE: im a creature of habbit and comfort
    discojoe: LOL
    discojoe: Hahaha
    discojoe: No
    discojoe: Not at all
    SLE: oh?
    discojoe: No, you are a creature of ambition and will
    discojoe: You have an underlying grimness
    discojoe: Results first
    discojoe: Judge based on results, actions
    SLE: precisely the way how i run my life
    discojoe: Yep, see? Kelly is retarded.


    SLE: i think..... tuesday night
    SLE: will be renamed to revolution night
    discojoe: I believe so
    discojoe: And the erection night
    SLE: no dude
    SLE: that was last night and this morning
    SLE: holy, fucking shit
    SLE: 7 hours of sex
    SLE: i have never done that in my life
    SLE: apparently neither has she
    discojoe: I'm going to kill you
    SLE: i actually believe you would do that
    discojoe: Oh, I'm like 40% sociopath.

  10. #10
    Quaris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just love reading these. What a great guy you are dj. Seriously, keep it up.

  11. #11
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I get the feeling that half of the people who say there's nothing wrong with cheating would be ruined if their significant other did it to them. Did he do it?

  12. #12
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    funny, I understand all of that... hm. you're totally right tho about net happiness, etc. he needs to think that through.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  13. #13
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is an interesting statement:

    SLE: this is the first time that anyone has actually CLEARLY fucking understood how i stand on this situation
    It's not that people don't understand (not exactly a hard concept), it's that they disagree with the rationalization.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  14. #14
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    It's not that people don't understand (not exactly a hard concept), it's that they disagree with the rationalization.
    Yeah, lol

  15. #15
    2 EVIL I golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Several stories high
    TIM
    EIE prob 6
    Posts
    2,969
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is Beta values? I can't really hop on board with it. Not to say I've been morally perfect, but eh.

    From the perspective of having an SLE boyfriend who's over 40 now? He has done some of this shit, and now he's looking at the last 20 years and realizing, "Hurr, I fucked everything up. I fucked up my relationships, and I failed to build a life. I didn't grow up, and time has passed me by." He said to me today, "Sure, I've done some cool things, but I've been on vacation all my adult life, and now I'm a failure."

    I would say that the vulnerability that comes with approaching/reaching middle age has an upside, though. It can pave the way toward intimacy. I'd say I'm experiencing true intimacy for the first time in a relationship. It's kinda cool.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jessica129 View Post
    I get the feeling that half of the people who say there's nothing wrong with cheating would be ruined if their significant other did it to them. Did he do it?
    Yes. And I need to point something out here. His fiance is a neurotic, subservient EII who will do anything to be in a secure relationship and has compromised her personality dramatically in order for him to stay with her.

    Now, this new girl, on the other hand, is IEI. And I was paranoid about making the type. I asked him countless questions, looked at several photos.

    All they do is hang out with each other and snuggle and et cetera. He asked her if she wanted to room with him next semester, and she goes "Yeah! I'd love to live with you again!" And when she gets home she goes around opening all the doors looking for him right away.

    The bottom line is that they're already in love and he should follow my advice.

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    funny, I understand all of that... hm. you're totally right tho about net happiness, etc. he needs to think that through.
    I thought it through for him.

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    This is an interesting statement:

    It's not that people don't understand (not exactly a hard concept), it's that they disagree with the rationalization.
    They disagree with people choosing to be happy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Golden View Post
    This is Beta values? I can't really hop on board with it. Not to say I've been morally perfect, but eh.

    From the perspective of having an SLE boyfriend who's over 40 now? He has done some of this shit, and now he's looking at the last 20 years and realizing, "Hurr, I fucked everything up. I fucked up my relationships, and I failed to build a life. I didn't grow up, and time has passed me by." He said to me today, "Sure, I've done some cool things, but I've been on vacation all my adult life, and now I'm a failure."

    I would say that the vulnerability that comes with approaching/reaching middle age has an upside, though. It can pave the way toward intimacy. I'd say I'm experiencing true intimacy for the first time in a relationship. It's kinda cool.
    Well you can't instill life wisdom in someone just because you think it should be there. The best decision he can make is to choose to be with his young, hot, intelligent, already devoted dual. He'd be a fucking fool to pass it up, and marrying his fiance would be the worst mistake of his life.

  17. #17
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    6,857
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    He'd be a fucking fool to pass it up, and marrying his fiance would be the worst mistake of his life.
    Why can't he just break up with the EII and start a relationship with the IEI?
    “Let us forget with generosity those who cannot love us”
    ― Pablo Neruda

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    Why can't he just break up with the EII and start a relationship with the IEI?
    Because he's an idiot SLE who doesn't think that way.

  19. #19
    So fluffeh. Cuddly McFluffles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    2,780
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim View Post
    Why can't he just break up with the EII and start a relationship with the IEI?
    My thoughts as well.
    Johari/Nohari

    "Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."

    Fruit, the fluffy kitty.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Projecting Delta values at him won't lead to anything good, so there's no reason to do it.

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,934
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Tell that dumbass you can't hold together a relationship if it fundamentally sucks. It will inevitably fall apart and then he'll have passed up a good relationship in the process. The longer you wait, the worse it is when you actually break it off. It's the noble thing to do to break it off.

  22. #22
    boom boom boom blackburry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    ESI-Se 6w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,269
    Mentioned
    142 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Projecting Delta values at him won't lead to anything good, so there's no reason to do it.
    LOL..since when is that delta values?

    the guy sounds unhealthy and dumb as shit. who doesn't alteast consider that??????

    not type related.

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsshadow View Post
    Tell that dumbass you can't hold together a relationship if it fundamentally sucks. It will inevitably fall apart and then he'll have passed up a good relationship in the process. The longer you wait, the worse it is when you actually break it off. It's the noble thing to do to break it off.
    Yeah, that's basically what I said. He was utterly enthralled to hear someone say these things and not throat rape him with Fi razor blades.

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackburry View Post
    LOL..since when is that delta values?

    the guy sounds unhealthy and dumb as shit. who doesn't alteast consider that??????

    not type related.
    Your tone is annoying. Ignored indefinitely.

  25. #25
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,231
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Which Beta values make him unable to do it? Its the healthiest way for any type.
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  26. #26
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    6,857
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsshadow View Post
    Tell that dumbass you can't hold together a relationship if it fundamentally sucks. It will inevitably fall apart and then he'll have passed up a good relationship in the process. The longer you wait, the worse it is when you actually break it off. It's the noble thing to do to break it off.
    Noble because it protects the fiancee from even worse heartache in the future?
    “Let us forget with generosity those who cannot love us”
    ― Pablo Neruda

  27. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No Longer a Dating Site View Post
    Which Beta values make him unable to do it? Its the healthiest way for any type.
    It's not Beta values, it's Fi machine gun fire that has caused him to repress his instincts to the point that they manifest in worse ways than they would have if he had been able to grow and nurture his personality. Hearing me say these things was like drinking ice cold gatorade through Megan Fox's tits after walking three days in the desert without water.

    The thing with Fi types is that they don't realize that their moralizing attacks often end up making things worse by shaming the target into repressing his emotions. The kind of shit that breeds serial killers.

  28. #28
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    They disagree with people choosing to be happy?
    No, you clearly do not understand the point made.

    What people will disagree with varies, but potentially involves (and is certainly not restricted to) any of the following:

    -The assumption that infidelity will always result in greater happiness, despite the wealth of evidence indicating the exact opposite.
    -That personal happiness exceeds social and familial responsibility
    -More generally, that Randian ethics trump established ethical systems and norms
    -That using mental/ethical gymnastics to cover a lack of moral character is admirable or authentic
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  29. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    No, you clearly do not understand the point made.

    What people will disagree with varies, but potentially involves (and is certainly not restricted to) any of the following:

    -The assumption that infidelity will always result in greater happiness, despite the wealth of evidence indicating the exact opposite.
    -That personal happiness exceeds social and familial responsibility
    -More generally, that Randian ethics trump established ethical systems and norms
    -That using mental/ethical gymnastics to cover a lack of moral character is admirable or authentic
    Ok, have fun with your evil moral structure that lacks any semblance of rationality.

    (Oh, and I did understand the point made. You obviously don't understand underhanded comments.)

  30. #30
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Ok, have fun with your evil moral structure that lacks any semblance of rationality.

    (Oh, and I did understand the point made. You obviously don't understand underhanded comments.)
    The best way to deal with trolling is to pretend not to notice.

    I'll take the response to mean you have no idea how to counter my previous argument. Can't rely on some libertard propaganda to bail you out this time, unfortunately.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  31. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    The best way to deal with trolling is to pretend not to notice.

    I'll take the response to mean you have no idea how to counter my previous argument.
    Lol @ your Fe PoLR

    Can't rely on some libertard propaganda to bail you out this time, unfortunately.
    Of course not. I don't rely on propaganda but on clearly defined premises and crystal clear perspective. I'd be happy to debate any of this with you in another topic.

  32. #32
    boom boom boom blackburry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    TIM
    ESI-Se 6w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,269
    Mentioned
    142 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    boo-hoo. could care less.


    i think it's sad when someone such as yourself makes excuses for their own and others behaviors and base it all on socionics, rather than stupidity, age, or lack of life experience.

  33. #33
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Of course not. I don't rely on propaganda but on clearly defined premises and crystal clear perspective. I'd be happy to debate any of this with you in another topic.
    No, discojoe, you don't generate original content - you're more of an aggregator. It would be like arguing with a less comphrehensive Google, you know? My post would be like a search query, and your reply would be the endless list of semi-relevant hits, with each cycle leading to increased redundancy until you start returning 4chan pictures.

    If you want to debate, then start with my posts in this thread. I can reword them or expand the ideas if they are too confusing (like you've claimed before).
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  34. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,934
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cheating is a natural process. It breaks up relationships that suck, and then new ones replace them. There's actually nothing wrong with it until marriage is involved. But that's just because the whole legal issues surrounding that. So as long as he isnt married.. cheating is fine.
    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    -The assumption that infidelity will always result in greater happiness, despite the wealth of evidence indicating the exact opposite.
    Which is why he should break up with this fiance, and then hook up with the IEI girl. Or he can cheat on her and have the same outcome. Just as long as he doesnt marry her.
    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    -That personal happiness exceeds social and familial responsibility
    Yeah, because holding together a dead relationship for years for purely obligatory reasons is a great way to raise a family of socially functional kids. And I'm sure it's in the womans best interest to trap her in that same nihilistic relationship via marriage.
    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    -More generally, that Randian ethics trump established ethical systems and norms
    Yes, genuine love can be dismissed since it's a non issue. It's all about your random ass guidelines & social ideals. And we can all agree on the same social norms.
    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    -That using mental/ethical gymnastics to cover a lack of moral character is admirable or authentic
    You really think your personal morals are universal standards. Lmao

  35. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    No, discojoe, you don't generate original content - you're more of an aggregator. It would be like arguing with a less comphrehensive Google, you know? My post would be like a search query, and your reply would be the endless list of semi-relevant hits, with each cycle leading to increased redundancy until you start returning 4chan pictures.
    Zzzzz

    Like, your words are just... I don't know... Boring. Like you're not really in sync with what's actually going on around you. It's like, eh, you just say things that aren't important or that don't really mean anything. You just sort of exist without any point.

    And what's with the comment about the originality of my content? When did I ever say I drew from a well of my own creations? Less comprehensive google? Where did that come from? What point were you trying to make, and what do you think it has to do with anything I care about in the least?

    God, fucking awkward.

  36. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fi basically amounts to a survival book of things not to do if you want people to include you in society. You can safely ignore it unless there is some strategic disadvantage.

  37. #37
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsshadow View Post
    Which is why he should break up with this fiance who he doesn't love, and then hook up with the IEI girl. No infidelity, and even greater happiness for him.
    I agree that if someone does not love their fiance, that's probably a reasonable course of action.

    Yeah, because holding together a dead relationship for years for purely obligatory reasons is a great way to raise a family of socially functional kids. And I'm sure it's in the womans best interest to trap her in that same nihilistic relationship via marriage.
    In this case it may not be reasonable, but I'm speaking generally with respect to the Randian ideal of increased net happiness. There are cases where doing what you want and ignoring your social responsibilities results in a net decrease of happiness; something which is certainly in conflict with the specific moral described in the OP.

    Actually, to be fair to discojoe, he basically states that himself.

    Yes, genuine caring and love can be dismissed since it's a non issue. It's all about your random ass guidelines & social ideals. And we can all agree on the same social norms.
    There are powerful religious, cultural, and even evolutionary systems that dictate moral behaviour. Whether they are wrong/right, or valid/invalid is largely irrelevant; they exist, and are not supplanted by objectivism.

    You really think your personal morals are universal standards. Lmao
    Not in the least. This list, at some level, will reflect my moral character, but to assume I hold to each ideal in all cases is absurd and comical. Such a reaction does not indicate very serious thought on your part.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  38. #38
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,334
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Zzzzz

    Like, your words are just... I don't know... Boring. Like you're not really in sync with what's actually going on around you. It's like, eh, you just say things that aren't important or that don't really mean anything. You just sort of exist without any point.

    And what's with the comment about the originality of my content? When did I ever say I drew from a well of my own creations? Less comprehensive google? Where did that come from? What point were you trying to make, and what do you think it has to do with anything I care about in the least?

    God, fucking awkward.


    I really can't think of a better way to describe your own posts:

    -Boring? Check.
    -Out of touch with reality? Check.
    -Irrelevant? Check.
    -Meaningless? Check.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  39. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I sooo love his posts, oh my, oh my.

  40. #40
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,618
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    force my hand

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •