Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The dirty secret of Ti

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default The dirty secret of Ti.

    It doesn't use objective reality as a decision-making platform, which means misuse can cause such abominations as the philosophy of Karl Marx.

    Te is simply faster, more "practical" logic. Practitioners of it enjoy gloating about its superiority due to said "practicality," but without Ti to help it see more than one inch into whatever idea it's tossing around, it is nothing.

    @ no one function being invincible.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: The dirty secret of Ti.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkside
    It doesn't use objective reality as a decision-making platform
    That's right, it's a subjective, introverted function. It gets pretty out of whack if some E source cannot keep it in check, that's what I think. also... spending time around people and being able to gauge their reactions (or perhaps even having the look at it from point blank range, seeing the consequences, and tracing it back subjectively).

    That's my reaction.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  3. #3
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default Re: The dirty secret of Ti.

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkside
    It doesn't use objective reality as a decision-making platform, which means misuse can cause such abominations as the philosophy of Karl Marx.

    Te is simply faster, more "practical" logic. Practitioners of it enjoy gloating about its superiority due to said "practicality," but without Ti to help it see more than one inch into whatever idea it's tossing around, it is nothing.

    @ no one function being invincible.
    Very good. They all have their pro's and con's. I'd love to see how each function changes (or doesnt) over time throughout the lifespan in terms of how each one deals with new information.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •