The dude, obviously. But if you feel VI'ing me (or the last mexican chick) feel free, I there are some new peoples and I'm sure they have new opinions.)
$_$
The dude, obviously. But if you feel VI'ing me (or the last mexican chick) feel free, I there are some new peoples and I'm sure they have new opinions.)
Last edited by Khamelion; 09-07-2010 at 05:48 PM.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Gentle eyes - I would say Fi ish.
IEE-Ne
XSXp
ESTp is very likely so is ISTp
The last chick is your identical type, ESFp.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
*nods*Originally Posted by Maritsa33
yeah, i think she is too. sometimes i think i'm noticing embarassing levels of Fe though.....EIE-ish Fe....Fe that I myself am not even capable of mustering on my most emotional days. But when I met her, I was with her for all of 3 minutes and we had an instant click of, "oh...wow...yeah i know you already." and she always expresses how she feels that way.
She's a lot better at articulating and formulating arguments than I am though. And she does it freaking quick...it just comes to her...where as I can keep myself from reacting the way she can....but I take forever to think of comebacks and a solid argument.
I'm gonna wait a while to say anything about the dewd. I don't think ISTp though, mostly because of the temperament and I'll go ahead and say that he has a certain level of disregard for Fi.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
I was gonna say ESTp before I read anything anyone else thought. he looks... awesome.
either ENFp or ENFj. I've met a guy the same type as him before. He took the MBTI and said he scored ENFj but he could just as easily have been ENFp. He tried to steal my ass innocence by lacing my marijuana with PCP and attempting to coerce me into anal sex, but fortunately no amount of PCP could make me lose my straightness. So I also am guessing your boyfriend is a latent homosexual as well. also I like that your boobs are hanging out.
craze, you don't make any sense how canbe confused with
????
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's why they call them quasi-identicals, Maritsa. Quasi meaning pseudo / false and identical meaning the same.
Also, do not reply to me or even speak words in my direction. Go away
look at the functions and personality/behavior.
OK; YOU PROBABLY DON'T SEE IT AS CLEARLY AS I CAN.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't think you're qualified to make that assessment.
Well it's named that for a reason, einstein.
lol. What clear vision. OMG. How can SiTe be confused with SeTi Maritsa?! Just look at the functions Maritsa! Look at them! Aren't they beautiful? Now stick your hand in your pants Maritsa.. stick it in there and strum your banjo.
Repeat: Do not reply to me or speak in my direction at all, just go away
Edit #3: Stop changing your fucking posts.
Obviously SLE.
Practice at certain things can develop a skill, like maybe she had more practice at formulating arguments where you had more practice at Fi.
I agree with Redbaron, that I do think he's ESTp; Usually, ESTp and ESFp's make a great match.
Be careful of competition with the ESFp girl. Just getting some Ne possible developments of future relations, it's probably nothing real or concrete to rely on, just a heads up
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
khamelion you need to come in here and supervise maritsa.
To think you actually knew socionics enough to easily differentiate them...blah.
I didn't mean seeing in terms of vision, I meant it in terms of mind's eye, the connection of the entire psche's interaction of all the functions together. Please excuse me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Be careful of competition with the ESFp girl. Just getting some Ne possible developments of future relations, it's probably nothing real or concrete to rely on, just a heads up
Oh no, no worries there...thats his cousinI'm not even allowed to flirty with here hahaha.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
rofl...usually I feel this way.....however she's oddly on point in this thread. not to be too insulting but honestly she normally bugs me.
i actually considered EIE for him but....ehhhh. eh. definitely going with beta though >_> also sort of considered LSI a looooooong while ago....and LSE.
@ redbaron....this is a random question...but am i correct in remembering you like motorcycles? or was that someone else....
in any case...i likes dis one_
Last edited by Khamelion; 09-07-2010 at 02:01 AM.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
yeah baby! I just came back from a ride!
IEI-Fe 4w3
soooo nice on back roads in MD in early fall weather. effing perfect.yeah baby! I just came back from a ride!
ill add some details tomorrow, but SLE is really the most likely. its almost painfully obvious to me now that I've lived with him for the last 2 months.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Why do I bug you?rofl...usually I feel this way.....however she's oddly on point in this thread. not to be too insulting but honestly she normally bugs me.
I've hardly communicated with you.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
im mostly a lurker these days....so it's about what i've read. mostly....
not trying to step on toes, just being honest.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
btw the second pic looks like mysticsonic. forreals.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
added 2 more pictures, its very hard to get him to smile in most of his pictures....but the first 2 on the initial post are 2 of my favorites.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Kelly, he is seriously adorable. LOVE the first pic!
IEI-Fe 4w3
I see literally no meaningful connection between the words in this post and what you're replying to.
No offense, but you actually seem to find every male person exceptional attractive if you see a photo in the threads.Kelly, he is seriously adorable. LOVE the first pic!
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
No offense, but you actually seem to find every male person exceptional attractive if you see a photo in the threads.no offense taken. I did say, however, that Matt Lauer was not my type. And who is "every male person"? Gilly?
IEI-Fe 4w3
Whenever someone starts a sentence with "no offense" you know guised condescension is to follow. The phrase doesn't get you off the hook, dickweed. Not in my book.
NOW GET OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!
On the other hand, without "No offense" MegaDoomer's statement was just fine.
@OP: ENTj popped into my head. Given
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
No it wasn't you wuss. I am the Fe type here. You will listen to me on this one, bub.
I think we all remember the time Absurd posted a nude pic and you immediately offered him a rim job.
he's very cute. I had sex with a guy that looked like this once, our chemistry was off the hizzah.
heheh. ours is too >_> he's a sex-maniac. gotta be a machine i tell ya!
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
I think redbaron is the authority here (and she's given her answer).
Actually... no, you were wrong in a more general way. "No offense" does indeed have meaning. I can see how his statement, without the smiley and without the "no offense," could be read as aggressive - with "no offense," MegaDoomer indicated that he was only pointing out an inconsistency, not making a challenge. There is indeed a difference.
However much this seems to be related to, I think your reaction indicates that you were addressing one of your insecurities, rather than the actual situation. I know that it's possible for the "no offense" at the beginning of a statement to be an outright lie, contradicted by everything else in the context; of course in this case the "no offense" should be ignored in favor of the overall impression.
/Therapist
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
If a person says 'no offense' then they were aware of being offensive. Otherwise they wouldn't of even realized the need to say 'no offense'.
They're aware that they're statement could easily be taken as intended as an offense, but... hmm, what's an offense anyway? It's an emotional thing (of course), that can be felt either by the person saying the thing or by the person hearing/reading it. One who says "no offense" is claiming that they don't feel the offense of it on their end, and is asking that it not be felt on the other end, as it isn't intended. This removes the social implication of offense (that is, the challenge); however, if the statement is offensive to the listener personally, then there's nothing that can be done about it.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
No, things are first inherently offensive, then it's up to the person to whether to acknowledge it. Offense is not completely subjective.
Gilly of course and partly also discojoe... but everyone who wrote an opinion said he looks good, so that wouldn't be such a good argument.
Exactly, thanks Brilliand. I'm aware that written messages, such as in a forum or in chatrooms can be misunderstood, because they lack in information like gestures or intonation. I wanted to avoid that redbaron might be overly offended by the statement, even if it's somewhat true. That's why I added 'no offense'. These two words just imply that I only want to share this fact without using it as an insult. On the other side, I'm aware that words which are written and read by the concerning person can't be taken back, so Brilliand is right with his last sentence, but I readily took this risk.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Lol, you could use that reasoning for any kind of offensive behavior and it would still work the same.
Well, maybe. But take a look at redbaron, I guess she got over it, so we may can get back to the actual topic of this thread.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I said dj looks great, meaning his muscles. Anyways, there are lots of good looking people on this forum as well as out in the real world...
alright, back to topic... Kelly your SLE boyfriend is HOT.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Reply With Quote
