1.1. Intellectual level.
Here the statics is to the dynamics as thinking fragmentary - analytical - is to thinking associative - synthetic.
Analysis, as it they treat in the majority of sources, this separation of whole into the fragments, clearly delimited from each other. Sense of analytical activity in the laying out of boundaries. However, synthesis akin to the associative property, by which are understood associativity, T. e. the association of two or several concepts by the illegible, but high speed service, when one of them, after appearing, immediately causes in the consciousness others. Integral synthetic means with the effaced internal boundaries as a result is formed.
The absolutization of the dynamic pole of thinking became the basis of the explanation of nature of mental processes in the theory of [assotsianizma]. First Aristotle advanced idea about the fact that the spontaneous means of consciousness can so tightly converge between themselves that form on the basis of contiguity, similarity or contrast the plural associations. Then J. Locke asserted that the ideas of any degree of complexity appear in the process of the association of simple sensations. In this case the association of ideas it contradicted against the purely semantic connections, which, in his opinion, were second.
And really [eydetika] it proved that with the aid of the visual associations it is possible to connect in the mind everything, anything. Here some of the eidetic the technician of memorization. They entered into the use even in the antiquity.
Ancient-Roman speaker Cicero for rote learning of his speeches by heart used the method “of tying to the locality”. It mentally spread information on the angles of its room, and then so mentally it returned to one or other angle or another and was extracted that required. Medieval monks - Dominicans, being trained to rhetoric, used the same method. They took familiar by it to the trifles road and mentally passed on it, consecutively spreading by means of the assertions, which should have been then presented before the audience. Coming out, they again mentally dispatch by this method, “raising” the decomposed there previously key concepts.
To the dynamic pole of human thinking skillfully beats contemporary advertisement. It is predominantly built on the mechanism of associations according to the contiguity (courageous cowboy next to the bundle cigarette) or to contrast (usual washing powder and advertised). In view of this in statics, if we judge by the criterion of motive to the purchase, advertisement influences much less than on the dynamic loudspeakers. Memorization in statics is more effective when material is structured by more rigid semantic connections. In this case each concept is fixed in its storage cell as in the computer.
Thus, the dynamics are more strong in the operation of synthesis (not simple connection, but confluence through the mixing), and the statics - analysis (not any separation, but stable - clear delimitation). The known pair of oppositions discretion/continuality is more connected precisely with the polarity statics/dynamics, than with the the customary rationality/irrationality. But if this is so, what is then the specific character of last dichotomy? Irrationality indicates situationality (predominance of context above the installation), and the rationality - regularity (predominance of the installation above the context).