VI VI VI VI VI

[Nexus]

Me a few seconds ago:


Me a year ago:


Me 5 years before I ever heard of socionics:


Me as a child:

[Creepy-cinq]

From a VI POV, you remind me of turturutu. Based on your wikisocion writings, I'd say you are heavy in structural logic. I'm leaning towards INTj.

Edit: btw, the photo of you 5 years ago, to the left - excellent.

[UDP]

I sort of agree with cinq

I see Ti, but it doesn't have the severity of Se. Or at least that's the impression I get.

Sounds like the question is still Se or Ne, in ego, eh?

[Trevor]

IJ-Ti would be my wild guess. Given that you're NT; I'd say INTj>ISTj. INTj-Ti, that is.

From a VI POV, you remind me of turturutu

Nice observational skills do we have here.

[Jarno]

Also, a friend of mine with an IQ of about 200, VI him too:

you do know that the highest IQ in the Guiness book of records is 186.

[The Exception]

I would have said ISTj-Ti but INTj-Ti could work.

[Gilly]

You seem rational and logical, and probably introverted; I'd say C-LSI-Ti. Your friend is some EJ, probably N-LSE-Te, or LIE, same subtypes.

[Nexus]

You seem rational and logical, and probably introverted; I'd say C-LSI-Ti. Your friend is some EJ, probably N-LSE-Te, or LIE, same subtypes.

yeah I tend to consider myself as C-XXXx, and more particularly thinking > processing > understanding; my friend seems like he could make a great Gamma NT, we have had some pretty deep epistemological discussions together

you do know that the highest IQ in the Guiness book of records is 186.

actually it is 228

Marilyn vos Savant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Capitalist Pig]

you do know that the highest IQ in the Guiness book of records is 186.

*COUGHIQTESTSAREBULLSHITCOUGH*

[Creepy-cinq]

actually it is 228

Marilyn vos Savant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the section Rise to Fame and IQ Score.

*COUGHIQTESTSAREBULLSHITCOUGH*

Agreed.

[Jarno]

my dad has an IQ of 300.


ps IQ tests are not totally bullshit, but boasting with a high IQ or having friends that have a high IQ is.

[Absurd]

... are also LSIs that look like you too, so not sure.

Me, for example ? Or is your database of LSIs' shite ?

[717495]

My database of LSIs is, at most, sexy.

[Absurd]

My database of LSIs is, at most, sexy.

Okay, it's been a pleasure talking with you.

[717495]

It's okay, if you want to talk about your problems, go see a shrink. I've been having weird dreams lately.

[Absurd]

It's okay, if you want to talk about your problems, go see a shrink. I've been having weird dreams lately.

Har-de-har. Everyone laugh. There was a guy, a patient, a famous patient, who was treated by a psychiatrist for believing he's a psychiatric doctor amongst other things. Guess what, the woman who treated him had to convince/trick him into believing she isn't a real doctor.

[Jarno]

Har-de-har. Everyone laugh. There was a guy, a patient, a famous patient, who was treated by a psychiatrist for believing he's a psychiatric doctor amongst other things. Guess what, the woman who treated him had to convince/trick him into believing she isn't a real doctor.

sounds a bit like that movie. Shutter Island.

[Absurd]

sounds a bit like that movie. Shutter Island.

No. Real case in the '40's. And yeah, that film was quite good.

[Krig the Viking]

My opinion hasn't changed -- your V.I. strongly makes me think LSI. I know an LSI sysadmin who looks very similar, especially in terms of facial expression.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[717495]

I prefer dull people with limited interests that are very intelligent or genius, to well rounded people who know everything but don't really accomplish anything worth caring about. More often it's the dull intelligent person who masters something in their life, like art, science, business or politics. Usually the well rounded person who scores higher in IQ tests, by comparison, was never as good or as smart at that field, but still knows a lot and can help people. They can show their good side in public. The dull person is just that in public, but the dull intelligent person is a master of endless awareness and novelty in their realm of perfection, where only true genius can be found. Smarter people also tend to make the same amount of mistakes. Some people who are incredibly smart aren't extremely good at mastering their field of interest, good at IQ tests or having knowledge of things. Sometimes you can just tell by their philosophy and how they implement it. A lot of intelligence is in potential of ideas and actions, for instance Charles Darwin, and thus is near indiscernible. There are certain clues; usually someone with an ear for music and speech, an eye for art and politics, or a mind for math and science, will only be able to know the potential reach of intelligence, and with that an intelligence which can constitute all intelligences through experience. The intelligence to quickly pick up on things is one of many. Knowledge is a talent. It remains subjective, and for eternity.

[Nexus]

I prefer dull people with limited interests that are very intelligent or genius, to well rounded people who know everything but don't really accomplish anything worth caring about. More often it's the dull intelligent person who masters something in their life, like art, science, business or politics. Usually the well rounded person who scores higher in IQ tests, by comparison, was never as good or as smart at that field, but still knows a lot and can help people. They can show their good side in public. The dull person is just that in public, but the dull intelligent person is a master of endless awareness and novelty in their realm of perfection, where only true genius can be found. Smarter people also tend to make the same amount of mistakes. Some people who are incredibly smart aren't extremely good at mastering their field of interest, good at IQ tests or having knowledge of things. Sometimes you can just tell by their philosophy and how they implement it. A lot of intelligence is in potential of ideas and actions, for instance Charles Darwin, and thus is near indiscernible. There are certain clues; usually someone with an ear for music and speech, an eye for art and politics, or a mind for math and science, will only be able to know the potential reach of intelligence, and with that an intelligence which can constitute all intelligences through experience. The intelligence to quickly pick up on things is one of many. Knowledge is a talent. It remains subjective, and for eternity.

Interesting that you say that, I have actually noticed that democrats tend to specialize in something limited, to the extent of expertise that they are no longer sense-thinking but rather sense-feeling, and as their thoughts are no longer so widely applicable they can then be considered intuitive-thinking; they tend to thrive on the free market. Autocrats tend to be 'in or out', so that they can all be focused to sense-thinking behavior simultaneously on whatever task needs to be done, so that that it can be done quickly and then 'they' can move on as a whole; they are chosen to favor by the governing party in a rather personal manner that is consistent with intuitive-feeling to support the organization from the top, and tend to thrive in very structured environments like dictatorships. I know this firsthand because the Navy is a battle between specialization among different systems (ratings) and total conformity and response to command (ranks), and with so much to be done each quadra can support its own niche to make it appear that in fact everyone is completely up-to-date with both each other and simultaneously with their own equipment.

[Blaze]

From a VI POV, you remind me of turturutu. Based on your wikisocion writings, I'd say you are heavy in structural logic. I'm leaning towards INTj.

Edit: btw, the photo of you 5 years ago, to the left - excellent.

yepper.....hawt

[Creepy-cinq]

yepper.....hawt

Yah, on a scale from one to 10, I'd say about a solid 8. Why did Jimbean go and ban himself? He would have liked my post.

[1981slater]

my dad has an IQ of 300.


ps IQ tests are not totally bullshit, but boasting with a high IQ or having friends that have a high IQ is.

It is a good idea to state the typical deviation of the results.

[12345]

LIE? ; >

[Nexus]

Thanks for all the compliments, even if they don't apply now

more VI:

[Jarno]

You like attention?

[sarinana]

I think same type as discojoe. Not lsi. here is LSI for comparison:
on the left.

[redbaron]

I prefer dull people with limited interests that are very intelligent or genius, to well rounded people who know everything but don't really accomplish anything worth caring about. More often it's the dull intelligent person who masters something in their life, like art, science, business or politics. Usually the well rounded person who scores higher in IQ tests, by comparison, was never as good or as smart at that field, but still knows a lot and can help people. They can show their good side in public. The dull person is just that in public, but the dull intelligent person is a master of endless awareness and novelty in their realm of perfection, where only true genius can be found. Smarter people also tend to make the same amount of mistakes. Some people who are incredibly smart aren't extremely good at mastering their field of interest, good at IQ tests or having knowledge of things. Sometimes you can just tell by their philosophy and how they implement it. A lot of intelligence is in potential of ideas and actions, for instance Charles Darwin, and thus is near indiscernible. There are certain clues; usually someone with an ear for music and speech, an eye for art and politics, or a mind for math and science, will only be able to know the potential reach of intelligence, and with that an intelligence which can constitute all intelligences through experience. The intelligence to quickly pick up on things is one of many. Knowledge is a talent. It remains subjective, and for eternity.

good post.

Huitzi reminds me of discojoe and a little bit of him: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tml#post686511

[Nexus]

You like attention?

yes, especially from attractive ESE's

[Jarno]

yes, especially from attractive ESE's

There are no here.

[Nexus]

damn

[Creepy-cinq]

Why all the head shots? Why not provide some photos in your native habitat? How about some photos of you with friends and/or, or at some social event? I think natural or unposed photos would provide more information about you and your type.

[Nexus]

here is a video of a live broadcast I made which might help...

http://twitcam.livestream.com/2k3dx



here is another cool guitar video:

http://twitcam.livestream.com/2k2za

[Beautiful sky]

SLI