Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 48

Thread: Every socionist should know this Star Trek episode

  1. #1
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Every socionist should know this Star Trek episode

    Star Trek TNG has always been one of my favourite TV shows and the episode Conundrum is certainly one of its best episodes. I think I watched it first when I was about 13 years old...

    Even if you are not a trekkie you should watch it and think about it because it illustrates what "socionics type" really means: The crew lost their identities but everyone still behaves according to his socionics type:

    Captain Picard: LII
    Commander Riker: EII
    Lt.Commander Data: LII
    Counselor Troi: EII
    Doctor Crusher: IEI
    Lt.Commander La Forge: ILE
    Liutenant Worf: SLI
    Ensign Ro: LII

    Do you think it would work like that in real life if nobody knew who he was?








  2. #2
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDo View Post
    Star Trek TNG has always been one of my favourite TV shows and the episode Conundrum is certainly one of its best episodes. I think I watched it first when I was about 13 years old...
    mm...

    Q Who?
    Chain of Command Part II
    Yesterday's Enterprise
    Best of Both Worlds

    In that order.

  3. #3
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IMO. Bold means I'm sure.

    Captain Picard: LSI
    Commander Riker: Gamma Extrotim. LIE or SEE
    Lt.Commander Data: LII (ILE with emotion chip )
    Counselor Troi: EIE
    Doctor Crusher: LSI (seems like she and Picard are identicals. She might be more though.)
    Lt.Commander La Forge: IEI
    Lieutenant Worf: ESI
    Ensign Ro: SLE
    Guinan:IEI
    Q: ILE

  4. #4
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Q has to be my dual. I'm discarding this BS theory if he isn't.

  5. #5
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought that Data was ILI.

  6. #6
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    God, Johndo. Each and every one of your typings is atrocious.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Captain Picard: LSI
    I'm conflicted between calling him Logical, Serious and IJ. Unfortunately there isn't a type that combines these traits. Which I do end up calling him is a matter of emphasis. I personally prefer ISFj for some reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Commander Riker: Gamma Extrotim. LIE or SEE
    I definitely agree that he is extroverted. Other than that I find him difficult to pin down.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Lt.Commander Data: LII
    It always annoys me when people say things along the lines of "data is a hypertypical INTj" because there is no such thing as hypertypical. Hypertypical is atypical. Data is an android and weird by virtue of being fictional. That's as far as I'll go where typing him is concerned.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Counselor Troi: EIE
    She behaves pronouncedly introverted through most of the series. I don't see how this typing can be defended over INFj or (maybe) INFp.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Lt.Commander La Forge: IEI
    I get beta NF vibes from this guy too.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Lieutenant Worf: ESI
    I agree. Again, probably not a Merry type like ISTj. Worf is distinguished from his Klingon peers in exactly that he has a hard time blending in with their "Merry" social habits.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Guinan: IEI
    Whoopie Goldberg seems to be ENFp, so that's what I think the character should be called.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Q: ILE
    Absolutely indisputable.

  7. #7
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    It always annoys me when people say things along the lines of "data is a hypertypical INTj" because there is no such thing as hypertypical. Hypertypical is atypical. Data is an android and weird by virtue of being fictional. That's as far as I'll go where typing him is concerned.
    Yeah, I don't think he's a typical LII and I'm pretty sure the writers went out of their way to make him seem non-human. The actor portraying him (Brent Spiner) seems like an Alpha. That's why I picked LII over ILI.

    He does often seek to integrate himself into the "merry" group activities of the rest of the crew in his quest to become more human, which is a good reason to suppose > seeking.

    She behaves pronouncedly introverted through most of the series. I don't see how this typing can be defended over INFj or (maybe) INFp.
    Some EIEs can seem like introverts in my experience. I'm totally unsure about her type, but I chose because her empathic abilities are externally directed. She gets easily flooded by other people's emotions that wash over her own, especially early on in the series.

    It could just be a race characteristic or whatever and not have anything do with her type.

    I agree. Again, probably not a Merry type like ISTj. Worf is distinguished from his Klingon peers in exactly that he has a hard time blending in with their "Merry" social habits.
    Yes exactly. The same is true of Odo from DS9. I get the impression they are introverts from the same quadra. And I consider Odo as ILI and a textbook law-minded Gamma as well as a clear NT, not LSI as some people have suggested.

    Whoopie Goldberg seems to be ENFp, so that's what I think the character should be called.
    I can't pin the actress down, but I thought introvert made some sense for Guinan because of the whole "I'm a listener. I listen." stuff, as though she's better at being receptive to information than giving it out. I probably shouldn't have bolded her typing because I'm not too sure. Definitely NF though.

  8. #8
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    And I consider Odo as ILI and a textbook law-minded Gamma as well as a clear NT, not LSI as some people have suggested.
    Yeah; Odo = INTp. I definitely see eye to eye on that.

  9. #9
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes
    Doctor Crusher: LSI
    Missed this one. I don't see any signs of Se in her, so I would be much more inclined to call her some INxj.

  10. #10
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    Missed this one. I don't see any signs of Se in her, so I would be much more inclined to call her some INxj.
    I don't have a problem with LII.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Stewart is probably LSI, but Picard is most likely ESI.

  12. #12
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Stewart is probably LSI, but Picard is most likely ESI.
    I have Patrick Stewart as ESFj, he's a carbon copy of my dad.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    I have Patrick Stewart as ESFj, he's a carbon copy of my dad.
    Then your dad is LSI.

  14. #14
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by discojoe View Post
    Then your dad is LSI.
    Nope.

  15. #15
    Executor MatthewZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I always thought Picard was a rather obvious ESI.

  16. #16
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Picard is ESI, thus my dual. Patrick Stewart is an LSI.
    Riker - my real dual, SEE (also my favorite character, which doesn't usually work out to be my dual--could be because he's an extrovert and sticks out really well.)
    Troi - IEI
    Data is a pretty weird character, but I think LII fits him the closest stereotypically.
    Wesley Crusher - LII
    Beverly Crusher - EII
    TGN is a bundle of fun in high heels - SF extrovert

    It's interesting how most of the main characters seem introverted.

  17. #17
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    Picard is ESI, thus my dual. Patrick Stewart is an LSI.
    Riker - my real dual, SEE (also my favorite character, which doesn't usually work out to be my dual--could be because he's an extrovert and sticks out really well.)
    Troi - IEI
    Data is a pretty weird character, but I think LII fits him the closest stereotypically.
    Wesley Crusher - LII
    Beverly Crusher - EII
    TGN is a bundle of fun in high heels - SF extrovert

    It's interesting how most of the main characters seem introverted.
    It seems as if every character has been your dual at one time or another.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  19. #19
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logos View Post
    It seems as if every character has been your dual at one time or another.
    Well Troi could not have been my dual, since I've never self-typed as SLE, and Beverly Crusher, her son Wesley Crusher, Capt. Picard, or Data could never have really been my dual, because I've never self-typed as an EJ type. But there is still a tiny possibility all of these people could be my dual, just in case I somehow haven't come into contact with the correct interpretation of Socionics yet. I've read so many interpretations of it, yet I doubt I've covered the majority.

  20. #20
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I used to watch TNG as a kid with my dad, but I haven't seen it since then, so while I'm familiar with the characters in a general sense, I don't remember any specifics. Watching this episode has rekindled my interest; I think I'll watch the series and then come back and see if my following typings are still the same.

    Ro: SLE. The most obvious typing of the episode, I think. Impulsive, aggressive, rebels against authority, doesn't like sitting and doing nothing. Her Aggressor romantic style is clearly shown in this episode.

    Picard: I agree with everybody that Picard is clearly an IJ type, but I'm also quite sure he's an Ne-valuer. The conflict between Picard and Worf early in the episode is strongly Se vs. Ne. Worf is focused on Se concerns -- making the ship ready for combat to protect themselves from external threats. Picard is focused on Ne concerns -- finding out the underlying nature of the situation, their identities. In fact, one of the common criticisms of Picard is that he spends too much time thinking before he acts -- he's Judicious, not Decisive.

    I could see him being EII, but I think his focus is on abstract moral principles ("Is it right to do this?") rather than human relationships, so I'm forced to conclude that he is LII.

    Riker: EIE? SLE? Something Extraverted; I'm having the same trouble as jxrtes and labcoat narrowing it down. For some reason I feel like he's a Merry type, but I can't justify it logically. I'll have to watch more episodes.

    Troi: IEI? I think she's Fe valuing, and I don't think it's just her abilities -- she sees her insight into people's emotions as important and useful, where someone who did not value Fe would probably not.

    Worf: I think he's LSI. Se is obvious, see above. However, he's less concerned with personal relationships (Fi) and more concerned with logical relationships -- when he learns that Picard is the captain and not him, he immediately accepts his position and apologizes for behaving otherwise. An ESI relates to people based on their personal sentiments towards them, not external relationships like rank and honour.

    Since I don't remember the episodes where Worf interacts with other Klingons, I can't really comment on that. I'll get back to that when I've watched more.

    Dr. Crusher: I get a vague impression that she might be EII, but nothing I could defend in a debate.

    Data: I think LII is pretty self-evident. He was always my favourite character as a kid, and now I understand why.
    Quaero Veritas.

  21. #21
    Executor MatthewZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not to pull an ad hominem, but I've yet to see a non-LII suggest Picard as one.

  22. #22
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MatthewZ View Post
    Not to pull an ad hominem, but I've yet to see a non-LII suggest Picard as one.
    How big is your sample size?
    Quaero Veritas.

  23. #23
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To be clear, I don't conclude Picard is LII because of any particular feeling of kinship -- I relate to Data much more. LII is just the logical conclusion based on the data I mentioned in my previous post. If there is opposing data or different interpretations of the data, I'd of course like to hear it.
    Quaero Veritas.

  24. #24
    Executor MatthewZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krig the Viking View Post
    How big is your sample size?
    Smaller than my penis but bigger than an elephant.

    As for reasons suggesting Picard as a non-LII, I'll offer that he places a high value on the loyalty of those around him and prefers to act on a gut instinct of right and wrong rather than what the context of a given situation might imply. While an LII certainly may possess these traits, I do not think LII is the type they are indicative of. I'll elaborate more in the morning.

  25. #25
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This thread was not supposed to be a discussion about the characters' types because I thought their types were relatively clear at least to trekkies...

    Again, I ask myself if socionics on the internet really makes sense. There will never be agreement. Some people really type Picard as LSI or ESI? Ne-vulnerable? Hillarious...

  26. #26
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDo View Post
    This thread was not supposed to be a discussion about the characters' types because I thought their types were relatively clear at least to trekkies...
    You can't not expect type debates about anybody on here, except for maybe Weird Al Yankovich.

  27. #27
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    jxrtes, we only agree in 3 of 10 cases. But our dichotomy correlation is about 65%. That's not a bad value for 2 experienced socionists I guess...

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    IMO. Bold means I'm sure.

    Captain Picard: LSI
    Doctor Crusher: LSI

    Lt.Commander La Forge: IEI
    Lieutenant Worf: ESI

    Commander Riker: Gamma Extrotim. LIE or SEE
    Counselor Troi: EIE

    Ensign Ro: SLE
    1.) Picard and Crusher are definitely intuitive. Both are researchers with a lot of unusual ideas. I find it hard to believe that anyone could see them as Ne-vulnerable...
    2.) How could Worf and La Forge be ethical types?! They appear to be clearly logical to me. Chief Engineer and Security Chief, not at all interested in ethical problems and hardly ever talk about ethics...
    3.) Riker and Troi are rather introverts but maybe they were supposed to be extraverts in the first episodes. There might be a type change from ENFj to INFj for Troi and ESTj to INFj for Riker. Just watch some of the earlier and later episodes...
    4.) Ensign Ro is tricky. She might look like an SLE in this episode but no, she is LII without a doubt...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno
    I thought that Data was ILI.
    Because of his suppressed emotions, right? Aliens and androids are hard to type. Using subtypes I'd say LII-ILI...

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat
    God, Johndo. Each and every one of your typings is atrocious.
    But you are hardly able to type one of those characters completely...?

    Quote Originally Posted by KrigTheViking
    Ro: SLE. The most obvious typing of the episode, I think. Impulsive, aggressive, rebels against authority, doesn't like sitting and doing nothing. Her Aggressor romantic style is clearly shown in this episode.
    Oh no, please don't type people by Gulenko's romantic styles. Being a rebel is also a quality of LIIs...

    Quote Originally Posted by KrigTheViking
    Worf: I think he's LSI. Se is obvious, see above.
    I'm constantly surprised what characters are typed as LSI. If jxrtes types Picard and Crusher as LSI while Krig types Worf as LSI - does that mean that Picard, Crusher and Worf are the same type?
    Last edited by JohnDo; 08-08-2010 at 02:02 PM.

  28. #28
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Picard's vulnerability to Ne is in how he always dismisses input that is too theoretical and speculative and asks his crew to get to the point on issues. All those cases in which he gets on the brink of saying "shut up, data!" are perfect examples of it.

    Every time he does "use" NeTi ish advice is when its compactly reduced to a statement on what will happen and what can be done with it. Once they're there, all he ever responds is along the lines of "make it so".

    Picard's most defining traits are his decisiveness and responsibility. The philosophical side, which is admittedly there, is no less Ne valuing than Ni valuing, and is just a side-trait of his to boot.

  29. #29
    :popcorn: Capitalist Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,263
    Mentioned
    167 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    I keep reading the thread title as "every socialist..."

  30. #30
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1.) Picard and Crusher are definitely intuitive. Both are researchers with a lot of unusual ideas. I find it hard to believe that anyone could see them as Ne-vulnerable...
    Crusher is someone I can see as LII. One of the more dominant kinds.

    2.) How could Worf and La Forge be ethical types?! They appear to be clearly logical to me. Chief Engineer and Security Chief, not at all interested in ethical problems and hardly ever talk about ethics...
    La Forge is a very sensitive guy. Sort of a typical overly sensitive guy / pushover too, so logical PoLR makes a ton of sense. A lot of what he does in private is try to solve relationship issues, find love, etc.

    Worf is definitely ethical, maybe not so much in that episode. His inner conflicts throughout the series are about being torn between two loyalties, two sets of values. That's .

    - loyalty to the federation vs. loyalty to the empire
    - his duty to his human values vs. his duty to his Klingon roots
    And more.

    He always chooses his own system of personal ethics and honor over what that others expect from him. Makes a ton of enemies by decisively sticking to his own system of values.

    3.) Riker and Troi are rather introverts but maybe they were supposed to be extraverts in the first episodes. There might be a type change from ENFj to INFj for Troi and ESTj to INFj for Riker. Just watch some of the earlier and later episodes...
    Troi certainly could be an introvert, but Riker is a true extrovert in every sense of the word. Socially, energy-wise, high presence in the moment, everything.

    4.) Ensign Ro is tricky. She might look like an SLE in this episode but no, she is LII without a doubt...
    I don't see why. She's very impulsive, hot-headed, undisciplined and unprincipled.

  31. #31
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some more guesses:

    Gene Roddenberry: ESE

    Sarek: LII

    Lwaxana Troi: EIE

    O'brien: SLI

    Keiko (O'brien's wife): LSE (?)

    Dr. Pulaski: harpy witch / LIE

    Any takers ?

  32. #32
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,045
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Picard
    Jean-Luc Picard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    According to this article, Roddenberry originally based the character on Horatio Hornblower.

    Described as "unhappy and lonely", Hornblower's chief characteristics are not so much his courage and skilled seamanship as his intense reserve, introspection and self-doubt. Despite numerous personal feats of extraordinary skill and cunning, he belittles his achievements by numerous rationalizations, remembering only his fears. He consistently ignores or is unaware of the admiration with which he is held by his fellow sailors.
    He regards himself as cowardly, dishonest, and, at times, disloyal—never crediting his ability to persevere, think rapidly, organize, or cut to the nub of a matter. His sense of duty, hard work, and drive to succeed make these imagined negative characteristics undetectable by everyone but him, and being introspective, he obsesses over petty failures to reinforce his poor self image. His introverted nature continually isolates him from the people around him, including his closest friend, William Bush, and his wives never fully understand him. He is guarded with nearly everyone and reticent to the point of giving offense, unless the matter is the business of discharging his duty as a King's officer, in which case he is clear, decisive, and almost loquacious.
    He suffers from chronic seasickness, especially at the start of his voyages. As a midshipman, he was once sick at the sheltered harbor at Spithead, the embarrassing rumour of which follows him throughout his career. A voracious reader, he can discourse on both contemporary and classical literature. His skill at mathematics makes him both an adept navigator and an extremely talented whist player. He uses his ability at whist to supplement his income during periods of inactivity in the naval service.
    He is tone-deaf and finds music an incomprehensible irritant (in a scene in Hotspur he is unable to tell the British national anthem). He is philosophically opposed to flogging and capital punishment, in many cases when called for by the Articles of War, yet as Captain and Lieutenant had to call men to account knowing that such harshness would be the result. Hornblower possesses a hyper-developed sense of duty, yet on occasion he is able to set it aside for his more humane concerns, to the extent that, in Hornblower and the Hotspur, he contrives an escape for his personal steward who would otherwise have been hanged for striking a superior officer.

  33. #33
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Roddenberry originally based the character on Horatio Hornblower.
    The creator's initial ideas and the final result don't necessarily match. In the end, the character is influenced to a far greater degree by Patrick Steward's personality than by any ideas Roddenberry might have had about him.

  34. #34
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Just something to note about the Hornblower thing... when they present the character to the audience that's different than how the character is himself. From the Hornblower thing jxrtes posted it looks like the crew (and the audience) is supposed to see the captain as admirable, resource, brave, quick thinking, organized.... but the captain himself is unsure and in doubt, introspective, etc... Lol but like a badass he doesn't show it... <--- lol last part doesn't have anything to do with socionics, I just felt it needed to be said. Anyways that may affect the typings, the division between seeing the character for how he is rather than the image he is portraying to the crew in order to keep things calm on the surface. I haven't watched enough Piccard to type him...

    have fun, cheers, etc...

    Btw that Hornblower thing sounds very e4w3 or e3w4, about self doubting, introspection but wanting success, having a position of status. Probably a 6w5 for head triad. Then likely 8 or 1 for instinct depending on how he acts, I'm guessing e1 for gut triad, since his char seems perfectionistic, dutiful, objective, but humane in extreme circumstances.

    e3w4 - 6 -1 ?

  35. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default my tentative opinions

    picard - ESI, though I can understand LSI

    riker - SEE, as much as I'd like to toss him in LIE, I just don't think his Te is very good, but there is something distinctly "rational" about him to me

    data - I don't really see him as that typeable. I think NT introvert is apparent but I would probably only go so far as some sort of LII/ILI hybrid or something. actually I could even see lumping SLI into that as well.

    laforge - Alpha extrovert... I'm fine with ILE or ESE... I would really prefer ESE except for his obvious social ineptitude. He is though a fountain of positive enthusiasm and I can see the Ne sort of idea generation in his solving of engineering problems. (I find IEI a rather intriguing suggestion, but I can't really get myself to agree with it... EIE would make more sense than IEI, but I still prefer Alpha)

    dr. crusher - EII

    wesley crusher - LII

    worf - SLE though I can understand LSI and I actually sort of go back and forth on that

    ensign ro - I had been thinking about LIE, but the SLE suggestion is interesting and maybe Krig is right

    deanna troi - I like IEI

    lwaxana troi - Fe leading... she seems more EIE to me in some episodes and more ESE in others and I can see how EIE is probably more likely than ESE but still I like to hang onto the ESE option. I think that her relationship with deanna works well with her being Fe leading and deanna being IEI because I sort of see deanna as calling her on her over-the-top use of Fe as deanna sees it. the relationship looks kind of like supervision to me almost, although lwaxana doesn't seem to feel inadequate about it so maybe mirror is better.

    miles o'brien - SLI

    keiko o'brien - maybe EII or SEI... I'm really not sure about her\

    Q - ILE (I really like this for Q)

    guinan and pulaski - I haven't really ever thought about their types and I don't have an immediate opinion... neither really stands out to me as a type... probably with pulaski it's more that I don't care about her character and with guinan it's probably that she's the "infinitely old and wise" character and then I just start seeing her as that and nothing else... I can understand the IEI idea though... I would have to think about it more, which I'm probably not going to.
    Last edited by marooned; 08-09-2010 at 02:53 PM.

  36. #36
    AndyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    TIM
    ILI-Te/5w4/548/sx-sp
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay, as a long-time Star Trek fan, here are my opinions on the TNG crew:

    Picard (ESI-Fi) - Strongly ethical, always willing to stand up for his crew and doesn't back down in the face of danger. Definitely introverted, has a fascination with tradition and history (especially archaeology) and has an attraction to assertive and intelligent women (specifically Nella Darren, who was an obvious Gamma NT).

    Riker (IEE-Ne) - People type him SEE but I don't see Riker using Se very much - when he is forced to be confrontational he's capable but gets aggravated quickly and uses it clumsily (role Se). In his normal relaxed state, he's a brilliant Ne-using lateral thinker (as Kolgami stated about his tactical abilities), very sociable, loves parties, is a musician and ladies man. Definitely extroverted and Fi-valuing, perhaps best shown in his feelings expressed to Guinan in The Best of Both Worlds when he's unsure of if he's able to fill the space left by the assimilated Picard, but then eventually comes around to making the only logical choice he can: trying to destroy his former captain and mentor by writing a whole new book of innovative strategy on the spot. Supervisor to Picard, which is why they rarely spend time together outside of the professional sphere, but simultaneously why Picard appreciates Riker's reassuring presence as first officer.

    Data (LII-Ti) - Easy one: his entire nature is built around developing internal logic (Ti) and developing near-infinite permuations to solve problems (Ne). His personal quest is trying to understand humanity and become more human, fitting in with the people around him (Fe-suggestive, Si-mobilising).

    I'll have a think about the rest later.

  37. #37
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wow, I literally watched this episode today. I generally agree with the typings above:

    Picard: ESI who is bad at relationships / non-Fe valuing LSI. His character is complicated by the fact that he serves as a mouthpiece for Roddenberry's very Ne-heavy worldview (pacifism, the Prime Directive, generally being patient and thoughtful even if it means putting yourself at risk).
    Riker: SEE although sort of vaguely characterized. Ironically serves as a foil to Picard's tolerance thus seems "less Ne". EIE could fit too.
    Data: LII, ironically one of the most realistic characters.
    Worf: definitely not a realistic character. An Fe-vulnerable LSI. (Of course, he is meant to represent Klingon culture to some extent which is totally Beta ST)
    Deanna: EII/IEI range, obviously has high Fi and low Se but not much else
    Dr. Crusher: maybe the most amorphous character on the show, she seems to have little in the way of specific motivation or weaknesses, other than being enthusiastic about her work. Maybe something high in Te/Ne like LIE.
    La Forge: LSE. Only knows engineering, sucks at relationships. (Arguably his character is not very well-defined but at least it all fits.)

    Others:

    Wesley: maybe ILE. Was supposed to represent Roddenberry's idealized view of himself.
    Ro: I was thinking SEE but SLE is reasonable. This episode does have some choice quotes that exemplify Se leading. One of the more realistic characters.
    Lwaxana Troi: EIE - obvious
    Barclay: LII/IEI (if LII, plays a crappy version to Data's cool one)
    Guinan: Gamma SF (the "tough love" therapist)
    Q: EIE/ILE range

  38. #38
    AndyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    TIM
    ILI-Te/5w4/548/sx-sp
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LaForge (ILE-Ti) - Geordi is very, very Alpha. He is generally outgoing but socially awkward at times, especially with women. The scene in Booby Trap where he tries to woo a crewmate by creating the perfect holodeck program on the beach is prime example of desperately weak (Fe) in his super-id. His logic, on the other hand is impeccable and allows him to see and create solutions to all sorts of problems. Mirror relation to Data, which is why Data bonds so well with Geordi and uses him as a font of information about how to deal with people. It's rather adorable that Geordi himself isn't that great at it either, though (vulnerable Fi).

    Worf (LSI-Se) - "One Riker! One bridge!" The scene in Where Silence Has Lease where Worf loses his mind over the logical inconsistency of Nagilum's fake USS Yamato having two bridges, and then tries to break a door, tells you all you need to know about Lt. Worf. If you want to confuse a (Ti) lead, just hand them an M.C. Escher painting. When dealing with other Klingons he always tries to remind them what is best for the Empire over his personal honour and objectives - the way he hits EIE Gowron with his line "Destroying an Empire to win a war is no victory...(and ending a battle to save an Empire is no defeat)." hitting Gowron straight in the suggestive (Ti) and making him withdraw at the end of The Way of the Warrior was a typical Worf moment, too. Very (Fe) dual-seeking, too; never feeling quite at home with the Federation or with his fellow Klingons and constantly seeking acceptance.

    Troi (IEI-Fe) - The living, breathing embodiment of (Fe). Fits her role as counselor really well, making her patients feel at ease and suggesting directions for them to take to improve their lives. However, typical IEI weaknesses show up in Thine Own Self when she continually fails the final command test because she refuses to order Geordi to his death to save the ship, forcing her eventually to use her vulnerable (Te) to explain to Geordi that this must be done to save the other thousand lives aboard. She's also not a natural leader and seems generally introverted, so I counted out EIE, even though she is highly sociable.

    Dr. Crusher (EII-Fi) - Go and watch her speech in Ethics where she lays down the moral law with Dr. Toby Russell, and tell me she's any other type. An introverted and kind lady with very strong (Fi) both on the interpersonal and the ethical levels. In Remember Me we see an excellent example of her engaging her (Ne) and (Te) as she logics out what's happened to her regarding the disappearing crew members: "If there's nothing wrong with me...maybe there's something wrong with the universe!". This (Ne/Te) combo is also on-show in the episode Cause and Effect, but her primary obligation is always to the people within her care. Kindred/partial identical with Picard due to (Fi) leaning.

    Wesley (ILE-Ne) - Virtually a stereotype of the (Ne) subtype of ENTp. Contrasts with Geordi's more down-to-earth, (Ti)-centric ILE disposition. Any of Wesley's interactions with The Traveler are amongst the best examples of his outlandish (Ne). Childishly naive in the way he misunderstands the practical implications of life, which you'd expect from someone that young. Oh, and obviously Picard's conflictor. "SHUT UP, WESLEY!".

    That covers the main cast. I could cover the likes of Guinan (SEI), Tasha Yar (LSI), Ro Laren (SLE), Lwaxana Troi (EIE) in more detail, but I think that'll do for now.

  39. #39
    AndyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    TIM
    ILI-Te/5w4/548/sx-sp
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    La Forge: LSE. Only knows engineering, sucks at relationships. (Arguably his character is not very well-defined but at least it all fits.)
    Thinking about your LaForge typing, you might be more accurate than me on that one - I don't see Geordi as Picard's conflictor. He could be more (Fi) dual-seeking than (Fe), and Wesley's benefactor would kind of make sense. Illusionary/mirage to Data, and semi-dual to Picard...I could see it. Is he my identical? Maybe.

  40. #40
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyW View Post
    Thinking about your LaForge typing, you might be more accurate than me on that one - I don't see Geordi as Picard's conflictor. He could be more (Fi) dual-seeking than (Fe), and Wesley's benefactor would kind of make sense. Illusionary/mirage to Data, and semi-dual to Picard...I could see it. Is he my identical? Maybe.
    Using relationships to type real life people, let alone fictional characters, is a dubious typing method.

    There is nothing that says writers have any idea of how types actually interact, in my experience they only make sense sometimes, not to mention the large variation in real intertype relationships.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •