1. Funny, because most of them aren't even my typing.
2. Yeah, but you use morphology ->>
3. If type is morphological (or based on genes) then to use this method type is unreliable and uncertain because the passing of physical traits from parent to offspring isn't 100%; genetics is a complicated field with many different outcomes taken from many different possibilities and cannot predict possible mutations, which occur fairly frequently as well as the various methods life has to mix things up a bit to encourage diversity. Unless you can somehow prove to me that your morphological traits are 100% passed down from parent to offspring based on certain 'type' pairing, I am inclined to accuse you of using unreliable methods.
If you can't provide this reasoning, I would be disappointed in an Ne creative, who should be well aware of the all the different outcomes genes can become
If you can link me the article I would be grateful. However, if it doesn't provide research, I wouldn't know if they are in the same boat as morphology woman here, so...