My question is why isn't this article used or referenced in the forum (at least recently). To me that is the best article I have encountered here, and it is very clear and logical. Also, it does not seem to contain subjective elements when analyzing the types, and it looks at the similarities between them as well by categorizing them groups, sharing a common "theme."
It's strange to me that I don't see anyone use it, is it because people here don't agree with it? Maybe I'm missing something.