Types for these guys?
Hamish & Andy (Australian comedy duo)
Types for these guys?
Last edited by silke; 10-08-2015 at 12:05 PM. Reason: updated links
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I'm not about to type some guy named Hamish.
Andy ISTp
Hemish actually istp
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-08-2015 at 12:53 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Racist.Originally Posted by polikujm
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I've always thought of Hamish as LII for some reason. Andy I would typed some beta NF. He's dating Megan Gale who I think is SLE???
Sherlitz, Sherlock Holmes, at first site appears merry and gay...lol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Good thing we all agree on their types. Agreement is very important.
By the way, you know them both, Rubicon ?
Yes, I have personally met everyone in Australia.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
That's the spirit.Yes, I have personally met everyone in Australia.
But this guy is merry and gay at every site. :-p
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
lol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Interesting. I was thinking of Hamish as being an Ne type though. I think SEE and XLE might be a bit odd considering their apparently close relationship.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I don't see either of them being Se dominant. If you watch Hamish on Thank God You're Here it's quite apparent he is at least a N type. He relishes in the improv environment and I would think it would be harder for S types. Their comedy seems to be alpha, really random, silly, experimental, easily brush off offenses but they don't bully like a SLE might have the potential to do IMO.
Good point re professional relationships. Hmmmmmm.. :-p Idk. I need to familiarise myself more with the way SEEs come across I think. I could see Andy being SLE. Reminds me of one of my brothers who I think is Beta ST.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Yeah Idk.. I was thinking that re Hamish and improvising too.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Bumping this old thread as I too am interested in Hamish & Andy's types.
http://www.hamishandandy.com
Hamish seems Alpha NT to me
there is virtually no Se in their videos, it's all Si/Ne and so/sx comedy
Hamish Blake - SLI-Te so/sx 9w1
Andy Lee - INTj so/sx
Hamish - introvert, Andy - extravert. mb INF* and ENTP
Why do these people seem so different from their video?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I would be happy to teach you how to type the p/j difference in VI. I see that you maybe having trouble with that
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
As 1st step to your dream you need to type correctly yourself.
You mean I have to type myself correctly or that I have to type others correctly
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
