What types do you have the most conflict with on this forum?
what types do you have the most conflict with on this forum?
I'm finding that I'm the most annoyed and have the most conflict (internal, even if I don't express it) with ISTps, moreso than ESTjs.
*sigh* And I never feel conflict with ENTjs.
This is no reason, in itself, to revisit my type. But it makes me wonder what other people's experiences are with conflict, on the forum.
IEI-Fe 4w3
For me, I think it's the people, not the types.
could be, yeah.Originally Posted by Brian
IEI-Fe 4w3
not you! I like you, LV. Always have.
IEI-Fe 4w3
I've had a conflict or two with ESTp's and ESFp's; that's it.
I had a really big one with Ryu, until he gave up, started to grumble at me, and accept my information the way I wanted it accepted, but that's just how our dual pair works. When I want to do something and I feel my dual is trying to control, I try to communicate that I want to do what I want to, but they don't listen because they want to control my energy. It's a give and take, he let go of saying that I posted too much in compromise for me to let him control my energy-flow and directing me to the specific threads where he saw the most advantage.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-13-2010 at 08:21 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
[QUOTE=redbaron;668191]what types do you have the most conflict with on this forum?
I'm finding that I'm the most annoyed and have the most conflict (internal, even if I don't express it) with ISTps, moreso than ESTjs.
QUOTE]
NO! I hope it wasn't me. It's Parkster isn't it?
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
[quote=Cyrano;668204]Not you! LOL Okay so erase what I said about ISTps. I think Brian was right.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Must have been something you said.
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
lol
IEI-Fe 4w3
I conflict with SLEs. In real life, too.
Supervision isn't really that bad of an intertype relationship. I usually get along fine with ENTps and ESFps.
yeah it's not that bad unless it's marriage or something.
IEI-Fe 4w3
good question. I experience probably the most frustration with delta NFs, and have the worst time in arguments with gamma NTs. Ironically, I think I get on well with all the delta STs. Rarely do alphas annoy me.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
That's because you're mistyped and ESFp's (actually, both become benefit relations) would be your benefit relations, which are very warm...
I should say, deceptively warm.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I always associated fake niceness with.
And Fe-valuers associate it with Fi. lolI always associated fake niceness with
IEI-Fe 4w3
I have conflicts very badly with SLEs and IEIs in real life, but here it´s been calm with them.
I´ve only had a few non-important discussions which were even somewhat funny with Brian (don´t remember his type though) and a conflict started by WorkaholicsAnon with me some months ago (I hope she left it on the past).
In real life sometimes I do have trouble with ESFPs, though, although I have a very good ESFP friend, one whom I count as one of my three best friends, and he´s there for me like I am for him, it´s just pure loyalty, even though he does things which I have to just ignore or forgive sometimes. I think ESFPs can be very good people but very very childish if they don´t check this because they have a very big and vain ego. They seem to have an immense need of self-affirmation especially regarding sexual-affective pursuits.
No we are not fake or faking it. Although we do seem that way to others, especially those who read into intentions of others like SLE and IEI types. There's so much meanness that genuine niceness is just not trusted any more.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Was this thread inspired by me? I feel so honored.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Or not even fail ethics. Just not-my-type. Fake niceness was one of the first things that I filed under the category of "irreconcilable type differences." Just a difference in what is considered real and what is considered fake. What an LSE would find super annoying "fakeness," an SLE might find super likeable "realness" even if it were the exact same action.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
None probably. There are people who annoy me but their behaviour is annoying not due to their type but due to crazyness.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Joy, whatever type she is.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Some of the Beta rationals (my typings, not necessary theirs), due to what I perceive as hotheadedness and delusional mindsets
Se dominants don't possess much of a threat to me via the internet as they do in person, so I haven't experienced any qualms with the ones here (in fact I like all the SLE's here thus far)
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I did have conflict with one member here and temporarily put him on ignore but have since taken him off my ignore list.
I think its more about the person and not their type.
Some of the beta's on here rub me the wrong way because they post things that are offensive. I think its a case of attention seeking and emotional expression gone too far. Not all the betas are like that of course and some of the nicest people on this forum are betas.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I know they aren't around often but SEEs. SEEs are probably the type that bugs me the most (IRL Too), it's like some one took everything bad about EIIs and SLEs and mashed it all together then let out some maniacal evil villain laugh at the thought of what they just unleashed upon the world.
Easy Day
That sounds really gay. You may want to fix it.
It may be because you really do look bad next to their niceness, and/or they thought you wronged them or someone else in some way. Just guessing though, from what i've experienced with betas.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
fuck "nice" go for real honest true people.
sounds like bush.
its still manipulative, though.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
you really think that is going to go somewhere?
Its probably not going anywhere, but regardless, I dislike justifications like that taking away from the main concern of manipulation - the end doesn't justify the means to me.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
That's hilarious. You make them sound appealing now.
Fake niceness should be labeled under dumb ass behavior. It has nothign to do with ethics.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
THERE ARE SLIS ON THIS FORUM ORLY?
As far as I recall the only SLI on this forum was force my hand.
I have a tendency to conflict with idiots.
HAHAAm I a threat to your position as an SLI?
Lol, Ez, what type do you think Loki is?
Correctly, too!
Highly unlikely to be SLI. Probably Alpha. Maybe Beta. Very unlikely Gamma. I'm open to arguments though. I don't really know him enough to say what he is, but I know him enough to say what he isn't.
Like repels like.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
