lol jk
sooo... after all that's happened... would anyone be super pissed if I switched back to ILE?
lol jk
I was gonna say....
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
How would you know? You're still a baby.
What do you mean?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You don't make me uncomfortable enough for you to be ESTp.
Joy, SeTi is different then what you used. They wait for strategic moment to make a statement which is brutally honest, yet painful for EII. I have many friends who are Se types and what you said, just now, doesn't hurt me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
yes, I would be upset, and emotionally lash out
that said, change it anyway.
its not your type.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
She's not kidding. She just wants to gauge everyone's responses.Originally Posted by Joy
I'd rather you just died
I got a sense of that too
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
that's cool
maritsa... I'm sorry, I just can't take you seriously. Like, part of me wants to call you on it... be like "lol that's funny but I know you're just faking"... and part of me is like "wow *shakes head* people like that really exist? really???
I feel like you've seriously got to be just messing with me, and if I assume otherwise it'll be like you're cartman at the end of that christian rock episode of southpark. No, your character doesn't revolve around me. But yes, I'd be comic relief. The question is, are you my comic relief, am I yours, or do we both belong to someone else?
Maybe I've just been smoking too much weed, lol.
Joy, something you must understand about ESTp's and I, they are attracted to me and the only thing that they have a hard time doing is figuring out my intentions, because, naturally, they are paranoid. I can't figure out what you're saying. I don't mess with people. If you want to know something about me, ask. I'm very honest. I will tell you whatever you want to know. I don't play head games with people, that behavior to me is unethical and goes against my principles and values.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
*hands you a cookie*
who knows if you're right, but you're so cute I just feel like giving you a cookie
so... what you're saying is that I can eat your pussy, right?
That again doesn't hurt me or offend me, because you probably don't mean it? IDK
Anyway, I'm not gay. So the image of that does not appeal to me. Unless, it means something I am not aware of, like a double meaning? IDK
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
PM me for Joy's street address and social security number.
No, I'm being literal. It's not meant to hurt you, just saying I'm down for it. (No pun intended.)
Flattered. I'm not into women, even though they can wear one. I fall in the really heterosexual marker of the curve.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Then you'll find Joy right up your alley. (pun intended)
Yes, you should be ILE. I would encourage and approve of that. I knew you weren't delta. And Fe/Ti seemed obvious over Fi/Te. Now, several people have suggested ESE, and I supported that as well, but if you are diehard 100% sure you are not an ethical type, or not an EJ, or whatever it is you don't like about ESE, the other alpha extrovert type makes just as much sense, if not more.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
(i wish i was like you)
easily amused
fuck, i've got nirvana in my head
i hvae the flu, headache, fever, sore thoat, watery eyes blah blah
ANYWAY we were talking about you being easily amused, not you amusing others.
that's of course assuming you typed them correctly.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
lol!
Drunk, ornery Joy.
ILE is the only Ne/Si type that could possibly work for me, but Ne/Si is still just unlikely. I'm talking to this girl who's SEI and I considered the "what if I was ILE?" possibility for a moment, but it's mostly just silly talk. I'm quite confident that I have strong Se/Si and weak Ni. (And being a logical type isn't even a question.)
Anyways, this really was a joke topic. The idea of an ILE typing themselves right and then leading their typing on a merry little adventure around the socion only to once again arrive at ILE just seemed funny to me. A very teensy part of my seriously considered the idea for a few seconds, but it doesn't make sense, overall.
And none of this really matters anyways, lol.
Removed at User Request
wow, yeah, I thought someone stole your passwords...
Why are you so sure of the above?
LII?
Why don't I see anything funny in it?
This discussion is turning into a sitcom.
Because E1s don't have senses of humor
You and I would get along quite well. Fucking ******s.
If you met me irl you'd understand, lol. Have you ever seen the show Bones? Imagine a version of her that's more talkative and laughs/jokes around a lot more.
That aside, when it comes to rational information elements I'm just tons, tons more confident and comfortable with Ti and Te than Fi and Fe. And no I'm not interested in explaining what I mean. Lemme know if you're ever in Milwaukee and you can meet me and you'll see what I'm talking about, lol.
x
Yes, yes, yeeeeesssss!!!!
Joy is ILE Ti, and Red Baron SEI Fe (that's why they experienced duality/aka Karezza in their real life meeting). End of story.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Joy is dumb
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
