ENTp
True Ezra's type
ENTp
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I think Ezra is Fe ISFp due to how much I enjoy his antics.
The end is nigh
It's pretty obvious he is Se ego imo. I swear to god some people on this site are just terrible at typing people.
Defend that opinion a little more and you'll find yourself typed Se ego too.Originally Posted by MasterfulMischief
The end is nigh
Except that is not the criteria I use to determine if someone is Se ego. In fact that's the exact problem I am talking about. People need to actually take the time to learn what the information elements are, how they manifest and how they interact with the environment rather than just rely on hopeless sterotyping like "Se egos like to argue, therefore anyone who defends their points is Se ego" "NTs are intellectuals, if you show any proficiency in intellectual/scientific discussions you are an NT" " NFs are artists, therefore if you practise any art you are probably NF" or "STs like to work with their hands, therefore if you work with their hands you are ST".
This is literally what I see 80% of the people here doing with every single typing and it's completely the wrong way to go about it, albeit my examples are a little simplified.
Yeah, stop being sexy.
Use dry wit a bit more and you'll find yourself typed SLI.
I can't, I'm beta
MM, you totally missed the point.
AA's making a satirical comment about how anyone who disagrees with niff is auto-placed in beta.
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
That's fine, my point needed to be said anywayz
your avatar is not sexy.I can't, I'm beta
How DARE you besmirch my wonderful avatar. I demand you take it seriously.
But really, If you think this one is bad you should have seen my last one.
Additionally, I believe it is fairly clear that Diana is ENTpENTp
really? r u serious?Additionally, I believe it is fairly clear that Diana is ENTp
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to the sexy wrongdoers.I can't, I'm beta
hah
Oh, I did see it.But really, If you think this one is bad you should have seen my last one.
Yes, it's true. True Ezra is a bit of a motherfucker in comparison with me.
Bow down, for I am the True Ezra.
lol
you're awesome.
"If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann
EZRA is not SLE type....
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's hypocritical to constantly bring people's types into question when you yourself find it offensive.EZRA is not SLE type....
I'm teasing him. But, you wouldn't know the difference, having had very little to no experience with EII types.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What I said was not merely in regard to that one comment; you constantly bring up people's types, yet have expressed a lot of animosity toward people who question yours. That is blatantly hypocritical and very annoying.
What I said was not merely in regard to that one comment: you constantly bring up people's types, yet have expressed a lot of animosity toward people who question yours. That is blatantly hypocritical and very annoying.
I will point out the functions that I see from now on. Tip for you....Do what you do, and leave me to do what I do best.
That way you won't get annoyed.
I don't care what you find annoying anyway. You can't begin to understand me or what to do for me let alone to find what I do annoying.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You are rescinding your request for me to not question your type then.I will point out the functions that I see from now on. Tip for you....Do what you do, and leave me to do what I do best.
That way you won't get annoyed.
"Eye for an eye...then everyone will be dead."
-Anonymous.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That doesn't make sense at all.
so you're using a quote meant to instill virtue to justify your hypocrisy?
this is despicable, seriously cut the crap.
your 'joke' towards ezra isn't funny, its an insinuation of type
knock it off.
It probably means that if someone kills someone, you kill another. Then they kill someone else, etc until everyone's gone. yes?
IEI-Fe 4w3
No, the idea is equilibrium, not an endless domino effect.
I'm saying that what he wrote is blatantly Te.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
But only based on your own idea of what Te is, which is not the same as most other people's, many of whom have been studying socionics for longer than you have.
If I kill someone, they'll kill me back...so I shouldn't kill anybody until after they've finished killing me and each other.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Other people don't matter. It has to be consistant with original socionics. What you're doing is taking what is considered Te and calling it Ti, which pisses me off because it creates inaccuracy, which I hate to see, and creates bad socionics.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Projection.
You don't know shit about who you are, perhapse trying to look in the mirror will lend you a perspective on what you do on the outside rather then on the inside.
If you should know anything about my type, it's that I do bug the living daylights out of my duals to bring them in a state of grumbling so that they become ready to accept the information that I offer them. So, go ahead and be utterly emotional and frustrated or anoyed, either way, it has no impact on my psyche because this is how the information is supposed to flow.
Without this, you will be incapable of receiving and adjusting information that you have WRONG or interprete incorrectly.
But, now, you arrogantly pride yourself in knowing who I am and what types others are without correctly being able to interpret their functions and how they use them as well as when they use them, or when they should/shouldn't use them.
This is comming from someone who pretends to have an education in socionics, Please!!! Save me from your lunacy.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lol
Then explain your crying on cam in tinychat after I became emotional and frustrated. What is that other than something having an effect on your psyche?If you should know anything about my type, it's that I do bug the living daylights out of my duals to bring them in a state of grumbling so that they become ready to accept the information that I offer them. So, go ahead and be utterly emotional and frustrated or anoyed, either way, it has no impact on my psyche because this is how the information is supposed to flow.
Projection, especially the bold part.Without this, you will be incapable of receiving and adjusting information that you have WRONG or interprete incorrectly.
But, now, you arrogantly pride yourself in knowing who I am and what types others are without correctly being able to interpret their functions and how they use them as well as when they use them, or when they should/shouldn't use them.
This is comming from someone who pretends to have an education in socionics, Please!!! Save me from your lunacy.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
