A user named Pinocchio (ILE) respected & connected with a few of my posts and began insisting that I'm an ILE, which could be seen as flattering....if he hadn't begun resorting to insults on my intelligence for my not seeing how ILE I am.
If there's anything clear when people meet me, it's that I'm outwardly administrative or organizing of resources in the physical world (not ideas or systemic components in a system, Pinocchio). This organization of resources and my emphasis on efficiency indicate.
According to this source, is used when people see the most efficient way of getting what they want. A large percentage of my posts involve me stating that calling someone stupid is ineffectual in trying to win them over to one's side.
Although we can't visually see expressions on the faces of the ILE nor on that of the purported ILI (myself) in question, a comparison of Pinocchio's and my emotive foci in our writing seems to reveal clear differences. I'm much more concerned about how the individual relates--, according to this source.
I also use a lot of references to how things appear (in contrast the ILE points out that things ARE, which I find more in friends of mine), presentation (but the ILE resorts to insulting me personally for not agreeing with him), and possible results of actions (which is ).
My typing ability has been challenged. here goes. . .
What I find to be one of the best ways to type is using the combined evaluative tools of Quadra values and of relational dynamics. If people are obsequious toward one (symmetrical relationship) and the people exhibit all of the qualities of Gammas (source)and seem more comfortable acting with than with , I'd have reason to believe I was a Delta ENFp or a Beta ISTj, since Gamma NTs have an asymmetrical relation of Benefit with these two types.It could also be that I have a relationship which is Supervisory (also symmetrical with NT Gammas) and be a Delta ISTp or a Beta ENFj. That's one of many exercises I do in my head when I try to evaluate a type.
I didn't just find this site. I'm a lurker on several socionics AND mbti/typology sites. I frequently read Russian translations of socionic types and read about the functions. I thought I'd spent about 3 years sifting through the types, but I realized it's actually been about 4.
Almost everything Pinocchio and I have said to each other on two threads--and we've said a lot--reeks of Alpha-Gamma conflict and extinguishment/contrary relations, to me.
any thoughts on how to clear up this misunderstanding would be appreciated.
Figaro for today (nanashi)