Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 49

Thread: NEW socionics test

  1. #1
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default NEW socionics test

    Someone from Stickam wrote some questions and asked me to program them into a test for him or her:
    http://thesocio.net/forum/tests/hugo/body.php

    Enjoy.

  2. #2
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,927
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    16 Thread(s)

    Default

    It says I'm INFP

  3. #3
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,927
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    16 Thread(s)

    Default

    if I say I'm INFP does that mean poeple will want to give me things?

  4. #4
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,477
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got INFP and ISFJ, very close to ISFP. Noice.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  5. #5
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I tried it several different times using different combinations of phrases and always get INTj. One time it gave me my type after selecting just two phrases.

    I think these four fit me best, but the test didn't allow me to select that exact combination.

    *You deal with the objective and logical aspects of life. (logical type)
    *You are attentive to your personal interests (I'm guessing this refers to obstinate types)
    *You are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient, or possible to lose (negativist types?)
    *You deal with ideas and concepts (intuitive type)

    Note that the above 4 are shared by both LII and ILI

    Additionally, these also fit me well:
    *You evaluate the purpose behind your actions (strategic?)
    *Your judgements are based on on your very own concepts and opinions (subjectivist, Ti/Fe valuer)
    *You are attentive to your own personal resources (complaint? I want to protect both resources and interests)

    I don't really buy into the Reinin dichotomies but it seemed to work for me.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  6. #6
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,927
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    16 Thread(s)

    Default

    hey i was estp this time

  7. #7
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you have problems take it up with the rightful owner of those questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    One time it gave me my type after selecting just two phrases.
    Did you refresh or anything? Because the test doesn't restart until you answer four questions and remembers the ones you already entered. [EDIT: unless you close the browser or clean the history].
    Last edited by xerx; 06-16-2010 at 05:15 AM.

  8. #8
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ESFp, ENFp, ENTj, ESFj. Reinin dichotomy tests are never that good.

    At least extroversion is consistent, that's not something I would have expected from any other test.

  9. #9
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well at least I'm a type on this one. The last Socionics test I took said that my results weren't close enough to any type.

  10. #10
    Haikus Sirena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    GAH, US
    TIM
    Mumpsimus
    Posts
    2,545
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INFJ

  11. #11
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    899
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    entj and estj..crap

  12. #12
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your socionics type is ENFJ.

    Doesn't everyone want to be their supervisor, or something.

  13. #13
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,022
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ENTP and ISTP.

    This test was quite difficult. I am not sure if I understood the statements the same way as the maker of the test.

  14. #14
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,225
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISFp, ESTj and ESFp DD, ok I don't think this test is any good
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  15. #15
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    East of the sun, west of the moon
    TIM
    SLI 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,706
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your socionics type is INTJ
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  16. #16
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISFj, ISTj, ISTj

  17. #17
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  18. #18
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  19. #19
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Alright, it works clearing cookies. I think you made a mistake in your algorithm, namely reverted Merry with Serious? Here are my answers:

    - In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose.
    - You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps.
    - When solving a new problem that arises, you create a new algorithm.

    Then I used two different options:
    - either: Your are attentive to your personal interests. - case where I'm an ENFp
    - or: You view a person/object without the context of the surroundings he/it is part of. - when I'm an ISFj

    So I think the second and third options should have add to Merry but they are adding weight to Serious? Or is this how it should have worked?
    If I were to guess I'd say your answers were: negativism, static, Te, and then ?, and not-Si? I guess one good thing about the test is that it's not easy to guess what it's measuring - so it makes it difficult to cheat. I've noticed that a lot of times people just choose whatever will give them the type they want to get regardless of actual sentiments. Not knowing what it's asking helps prevent that.

  20. #20
    i'll tear down the sky Mattie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    TIM
    NeFi
    Posts
    1,105
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took Hugo's test a while ago, and it sucked then. And now...

    Your socionics type is INTJ, INFJ; ISTJ...

    It still really sucks.

    First of all, none of us actively think in any of those choices. While we may have some sort of 'algorithm' for thinking, we all most likely have a similar process and none of us are robots that have that on our display screen when interacting with another person (who happens to be Sarah Conner ). A lot of these choices were too broad, too steeped in stereotypes, and were traits everyone could easily share. I honestly don't think it is possible to have a good test until IEs are scientifically proven, so you would know how to actually find them.

  21. #21
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  22. #22
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is recommended to take the test as many times as possible
    to get an accurate view of your socionics type.
    lol

  24. #24
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    @squark: is this what you took as Te?
    I think it might be what the testmaker used to determine Te, but it's not how I would.

  25. #25
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    @squark: is this what you took as Te?
    I also think this question relates more or less to Te, but it's possible there's some weird dichotomy involved.

    I wouldn't define Te this way, but I must say it works for this function (keep in mind it's your demonstrative, so you use whether you're aware of it or not); it figures how to do things "methodically" - that is, by creating a method, hence "algorithmic" logic. Not really "dilligently" or "following a ready-made recipe to a letter" or whatever else it could be thought to mean. I've no wish to start the old argument again, but that's a big part of strong Te. It refers to the approach taken, in short.

  26. #26
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  27. #27
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTJ

    I don't like the test, I also don't find it a good one either.

  28. #28
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP

  29. #29
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Yeah, me too.

    I think there your interpretation is sensible, but that includes creating and memorizing/reusing that algorithm. I didn't considered that, I simply create another one.

    You are justified to include that, though, because of the ambiguity of the context - "new problem". There can be totally different problems where simply known algorithms can't be applied or fail (Te) and new instances of experienced problems, maybe slightly different, but where known algorithms can be applied.
    If an old solution can be applied, it's not a new problem. If an old solution needs to be adapted a bit, it's still not a new problem. In fact, often it isn't really a problem anymore, just a bother someone else can take care of, if I manage to get them to (I wish people were more cooperative). I suppose it's all a matter of perception.


    In any case, it's not related to Demonstrative, Ti-Ego and Ti-Id are not doing things the same way, this *is* the difference between them (...)
    I know that, I've mentioned several times times that I think deconstructive would be more fitting name, in a way; I mostly use my Ti to criticize and point out flaws, not construct.

  30. #30
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's a bug, or something.

    I first chose "In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose." then went backpage to copy it to remember, then went forth, chose "You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps." then something changed, I think, so I went back again or something, and in the end I retook closed the page and retook the test, but after I choose the first preference, the second (with the steps evaluation) disappears, along with others, but id didn't disappear the first time.

    Should I clear some cookies, why does it behave differently?
    The test opens a session so this is supposed to happen. You need to clear the cache or pick any 4 choices if you want the session to close. If you get an error message the session closes and you can restart.

    Try to do the test in one shot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Alright, it works clearing cookies. I think you made a mistake in your algorithm, namely reverted Merry with Serious? Here are my answers:

    - In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose. Negativism
    - You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps. Tactical
    - When solving a new problem that arises, you create a new algorithm. Carefree

    Then I used two different options:
    - either: Your are attentive to your personal interests. - case where I'm an ENFp Obstinate
    - or: You view a person/object without the context of the surroundings he/it is part of. - when I'm an ISFj Democratic
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Obstinate = ENFp
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Democratic = ISFj

  31. #31
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Obstinate = ENFp
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Democratic = ISFj
    OK, so it's really just a weird Te-unrelated dichotomy then. The questions leave a lot of room for interpretation, though. I obviously choose the wrong ones to end - taking several routes - with ENFj (I've also got ENFp once - and ESFj, though that was by clicking accidentally).

  32. #32
    star stuff April's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    chatbox
    TIM
    NG human sorcerer
    Posts
    915
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFj twice --> INTj --> INFj twice

  33. #33
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides. -THAT RESULTS IN INFJ?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  34. #34
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides. -THAT RESULTS IN INFJ?
    That's supposed to describe static types, one of which just happens to be INFj.

  35. #35
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request
    Last edited by Pied Piper; 06-16-2010 at 08:10 PM.

  36. #36
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    That's supposed to describe static types, one of which just happens to be INFj.
    what is "unvarying characteristics"?
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-16-2010 at 09:44 PM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  37. #37
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    My order of choices are:

    You deal with emotions and feelings of people.

    You deal with ideas and concepts.

    You deal with your surrounding according to your plans, expectations, and personal criteria

    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides.

    I chose the last because it had the word sequence, other then that I would not have chosen it, so please explain to me what the check does that sentence mean.
    Produced INFj
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  38. #38
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    I understand. This is where you're wrong: believing that those dichotomies are true - apart from Democratic, where I think that answer might actually be appropriate.

    Edit: "...where I think you're wrong"
    Pinocchio, this isn't my test. I just programmed it for Hugo.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides.
    Static.

  39. #39
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Pinocchio, this isn't my test. I just programmed it for Hugo.



    Static.
    SEE are testing EII on this test, that shows a problem to me.
    Perhapse you might need to find a way to differentiate the statics.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  40. #40
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Pinocchio, this isn't my test. I just programmed it for Hugo.
    Hugo lives! He is like the voldermort channeling his soul and magic through your shell.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •