Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 49

Thread: NEW socionics test

  1. #1
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,480
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default NEW socionics test

    Someone from Stickam wrote some questions and asked me to program them into a test for him or her:
    http://thesocio.net/forum/tests/hugo/body.php

    Enjoy.
    It was in the reign of George III that the aforesaid personages lived and quarrelled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor, they are all equal now.

  2. #2
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,811
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your socionics type is ENTJ
    .
    This test sucks.
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  3. #3
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    It says I'm INFP

  4. #4
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,811
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  5. #5
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    if I say I'm INFP does that mean poeple will want to give me things?

  6. #6
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got INFP and ISFJ, very close to ISFP. Noice.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  7. #7
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I tried it several different times using different combinations of phrases and always get INTj. One time it gave me my type after selecting just two phrases.

    I think these four fit me best, but the test didn't allow me to select that exact combination.

    *You deal with the objective and logical aspects of life. (logical type)
    *You are attentive to your personal interests (I'm guessing this refers to obstinate types)
    *You are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient, or possible to lose (negativist types?)
    *You deal with ideas and concepts (intuitive type)

    Note that the above 4 are shared by both LII and ILI

    Additionally, these also fit me well:
    *You evaluate the purpose behind your actions (strategic?)
    *Your judgements are based on on your very own concepts and opinions (subjectivist, Ti/Fe valuer)
    *You are attentive to your own personal resources (complaint? I want to protect both resources and interests)

    I don't really buy into the Reinin dichotomies but it seemed to work for me.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  8. #8
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    hey i was estp this time

  9. #9
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,480
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you have problems take it up with the rightful owner of those questions.

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    One time it gave me my type after selecting just two phrases.
    Did you refresh or anything? Because the test doesn't restart until you answer four questions and remembers the ones you already entered. [EDIT: unless you close the browser or clean the history].
    Last edited by xerx; 06-16-2010 at 06:15 AM.
    It was in the reign of George III that the aforesaid personages lived and quarrelled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor, they are all equal now.

  10. #10
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,450
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ESFp, ENFp, ENTj, ESFj. Reinin dichotomy tests are never that good.

    At least extroversion is consistent, that's not something I would have expected from any other test.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  11. #11
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well at least I'm a type on this one. The last Socionics test I took said that my results weren't close enough to any type.

  12. #12
    Haikus Sirena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    GAH, US
    TIM
    Mumpsimus
    Posts
    2,549
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INFJ

  13. #13
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    entj and estj..crap

  14. #14
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your socionics type is ENFJ.

    Doesn't everyone want to be their supervisor, or something.

  15. #15
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,025
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ENTP and ISTP.

    This test was quite difficult. I am not sure if I understood the statements the same way as the maker of the test.

  16. #16
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,231
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISFp, ESTj and ESFp DD, ok I don't think this test is any good
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  17. #17
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Beyond the blue horizon
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    13,088
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your socionics type is INTJ
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  18. #18
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,120
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISFj, ISTj, ISTj

  19. #19
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  20. #20
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  21. #21
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,120
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Alright, it works clearing cookies. I think you made a mistake in your algorithm, namely reverted Merry with Serious? Here are my answers:

    - In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose.
    - You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps.
    - When solving a new problem that arises, you create a new algorithm.

    Then I used two different options:
    - either: Your are attentive to your personal interests. - case where I'm an ENFp
    - or: You view a person/object without the context of the surroundings he/it is part of. - when I'm an ISFj

    So I think the second and third options should have add to Merry but they are adding weight to Serious? Or is this how it should have worked?
    If I were to guess I'd say your answers were: negativism, static, Te, and then ?, and not-Si? I guess one good thing about the test is that it's not easy to guess what it's measuring - so it makes it difficult to cheat. I've noticed that a lot of times people just choose whatever will give them the type they want to get regardless of actual sentiments. Not knowing what it's asking helps prevent that.

  22. #22
    i'll tear down the sky Mattie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    TIM
    NeFi
    Posts
    1,108
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took Hugo's test a while ago, and it sucked then. And now...

    Your socionics type is INTJ, INFJ; ISTJ...

    It still really sucks.

    First of all, none of us actively think in any of those choices. While we may have some sort of 'algorithm' for thinking, we all most likely have a similar process and none of us are robots that have that on our display screen when interacting with another person (who happens to be Sarah Conner ). A lot of these choices were too broad, too steeped in stereotypes, and were traits everyone could easily share. I honestly don't think it is possible to have a good test until IEs are scientifically proven, so you would know how to actually find them.

  23. #23
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  24. #24
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  25. #25
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is recommended to take the test as many times as possible
    to get an accurate view of your socionics type.
    lol

  26. #26
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,120
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    @squark: is this what you took as Te?
    I think it might be what the testmaker used to determine Te, but it's not how I would.

  27. #27
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    @squark: is this what you took as Te?
    I also think this question relates more or less to Te, but it's possible there's some weird dichotomy involved.

    I wouldn't define Te this way, but I must say it works for this function (keep in mind it's your demonstrative, so you use whether you're aware of it or not); it figures how to do things "methodically" - that is, by creating a method, hence "algorithmic" logic. Not really "dilligently" or "following a ready-made recipe to a letter" or whatever else it could be thought to mean. I've no wish to start the old argument again, but that's a big part of strong Te. It refers to the approach taken, in short.

  28. #28
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  29. #29
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTJ

    I don't like the test, I also don't find it a good one either.

  30. #30
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,860
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP

  31. #31
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Yeah, me too.

    I think there your interpretation is sensible, but that includes creating and memorizing/reusing that algorithm. I didn't considered that, I simply create another one.

    You are justified to include that, though, because of the ambiguity of the context - "new problem". There can be totally different problems where simply known algorithms can't be applied or fail (Te) and new instances of experienced problems, maybe slightly different, but where known algorithms can be applied.
    If an old solution can be applied, it's not a new problem. If an old solution needs to be adapted a bit, it's still not a new problem. In fact, often it isn't really a problem anymore, just a bother someone else can take care of, if I manage to get them to (I wish people were more cooperative). I suppose it's all a matter of perception.


    In any case, it's not related to Demonstrative, Ti-Ego and Ti-Id are not doing things the same way, this *is* the difference between them (...)
    I know that, I've mentioned several times times that I think deconstructive would be more fitting name, in a way; I mostly use my Ti to criticize and point out flaws, not construct.

  32. #32
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,480
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's a bug, or something.

    I first chose "In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose." then went backpage to copy it to remember, then went forth, chose "You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps." then something changed, I think, so I went back again or something, and in the end I retook closed the page and retook the test, but after I choose the first preference, the second (with the steps evaluation) disappears, along with others, but id didn't disappear the first time.

    Should I clear some cookies, why does it behave differently?
    The test opens a session so this is supposed to happen. You need to clear the cache or pick any 4 choices if you want the session to close. If you get an error message the session closes and you can restart.

    Try to do the test in one shot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    Alright, it works clearing cookies. I think you made a mistake in your algorithm, namely reverted Merry with Serious? Here are my answers:

    - In a situation, you are aware of dangers and what is absent, insufficient or possible to lose. Negativism
    - You evaluate the next step to take in a sequence of steps. Tactical
    - When solving a new problem that arises, you create a new algorithm. Carefree

    Then I used two different options:
    - either: Your are attentive to your personal interests. - case where I'm an ENFp Obstinate
    - or: You view a person/object without the context of the surroundings he/it is part of. - when I'm an ISFj Democratic
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Obstinate = ENFp
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Democratic = ISFj
    It was in the reign of George III that the aforesaid personages lived and quarrelled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor, they are all equal now.

  33. #33
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Obstinate = ENFp
    Negativism + Tactical + Carefree + Democratic = ISFj
    OK, so it's really just a weird Te-unrelated dichotomy then. The questions leave a lot of room for interpretation, though. I obviously choose the wrong ones to end - taking several routes - with ENFj (I've also got ENFp once - and ESFj, though that was by clicking accidentally).

  34. #34
    star stuff April's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    chatbox
    TIM
    NG human sorcerer
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFj twice --> INTj --> INFj twice

  35. #35
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides. -THAT RESULTS IN INFJ?

  36. #36
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides. -THAT RESULTS IN INFJ?
    That's supposed to describe static types, one of which just happens to be INFj.

  37. #37
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request
    Last edited by Pied Piper; 06-16-2010 at 09:10 PM.

  38. #38
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    That's supposed to describe static types, one of which just happens to be INFj.
    what is "unvarying characteristics"?
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-16-2010 at 10:44 PM.

  39. #39
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    My order of choices are:

    You deal with emotions and feelings of people.

    You deal with ideas and concepts.

    You deal with your surrounding according to your plans, expectations, and personal criteria

    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides.

    I chose the last because it had the word sequence, other then that I would not have chosen it, so please explain to me what the check does that sentence mean.
    Produced INFj

  40. #40
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,480
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio View Post
    I understand. This is where you're wrong: believing that those dichotomies are true - apart from Democratic, where I think that answer might actually be appropriate.

    Edit: "...where I think you're wrong"
    Pinocchio, this isn't my test. I just programmed it for Hugo.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    You are aware of the unvarying characteristics of your surroundings, and perceive the sequence of an event as a collection of consecutive still photos/frames/slides.
    Static.
    It was in the reign of George III that the aforesaid personages lived and quarrelled; good or bad, handsome or ugly, rich or poor, they are all equal now.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •