Hi, I'm Absurd, and I've been redirected. Re-born LSE, that is.
Hi, I'm Absurd, and I've been redirected. Re-born LSE, that is.
Hello, I'm Aiss, your new supervisor. Do as you're bid and you shall keep your new rank.
Cool. You pay your group dues directly to me.
*lures him back in with a piece of cheese*
LOL this whole exchange is hilarious!
Absurd ur really LSE now? what made u rest on this type?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Welcome to the cool club!
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Where's your Te; I want a workflow chart to see your presense/valuing of that function. Thanks.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Specifics would be greatly appreciated.
Nope. I'm quite reclusive. I mean, I know lots of people, but what's an emotional environment. An environment where I go from place to place kissing everyone I happen to bump into ? Cyclops would prefer me saying "stabbing everyone I bump in to", I just realised, but no, I don't stab nor kiss everyone I bump into, thus the emotional environment is lacking in substance.
I don't own a work flow chart.
Thanks, I found it quite amusing myself after it was publicised, that is.
Cyclops sticks to his guns, noted.
Yeah, I told you I'm SLI, that's right, plus the pic screaming(?) SLI, that I sent you, should convince you.
Thanks
Se is the least well understood function because people have attached so much matcho BS to it that it's essence has been lost in macho crap...sorry, frustration, and venting.
Do you like to throw parties and get togethers for people?
Do you like to go to parties and get togethers where people are?
When you are at a party or a get together what do you do, descibe your external self, do you watch, and when you watch people what are you looking at?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nope.
If I don't know them personally, no. Yes, if I do know them personally. Overall, I'm not much of a party goer.
I lie on the floor pissed drunk, or loose my inhibitions completely.
EDIT: I'm looking at plenty of things. They way one talks, what gestures she/he makes (are the gestures sudden, slow), etc.
I know enough, to know to not take everything you say at face value. I don't generally use VI much. The photo you sent contained alot more information than just bone structure.
There appears to be alot that you keep to yourself including what type you actually believe yourself to be.
So are you actually LSE or are you just playing?
IEE-Ne
The camara angle is facing upwards, you are looking down at anyone that looks at this photo. This gives me the initial impression at leat that you perhaps see yourself as either aloof or domineering.
The room is dark and although it appears to be daylight the curtains a drawn, suggesting that you a re perhaps quite a private person.
The one visible wall in the room is bare and impersonal; painted in a simple colour as is the ceiling.
Your hair is short and has no style to speak of and you are not wearing a shirt, so the observer cannot draw conclusions about your dress sense.
I have already stated that I do not VI in general and the overwhelming messages I toook from the photo relate solely to your anonymous image.
The angle of the photo and your downturned facial expression. The image certainly says something about who you are when you took the photo and it also says something about who you see yoursefl as being when you selected it, it also probably says something about your type. I would not be prepared to comment on that at this time.
IEE-Ne
Unless there's reasons to the contrary. No ones gave any reasons for it that i've seen. Unfortunately type isn't determined by how many anonymous people might lol on chatbox.
Didn't you say before that deltas are weird? Why would you say that?
Man this place has got some weird typing methods, it's just like group speak so far.
Did you loose your own opinion on your type or are you just going with what some people want you to be instead?
I don't care how many will or will not. The fact that it was done and can be done fully satisfies me.
I don't remember correctly when, how and why I said that. If it's stored in a form of a post I was replying to, it can be easily found, if not, no
I'm not much keen on choosing a side. Only will do so when the situation is ripe (as in you making a mistake for example), or the facts presented, are not what they are/were in reality, although, I don't give a flying toss sometimes.
But to answer your question, I'm not negating the fact, that something described above by you, took place.
EDIT:
Both. I don't discriminate nor underestimate.
What does that even mean ? I mean, what idiot, would expect, an idiot, let's say, in a relationship, dirty tricks. That's stupid.
If they want me to, I may.
Spot-on. You could write textbooks for some agencies
Last edited by Absurd; 06-13-2010 at 08:13 PM.
This is Se quality, noticing what a person is/does from observation of Se nature and makes comments about the nature of the object..."This person does this or that". Nature of Se is to observe character/traits of objects, and unfortunately SeTi rather notice the negative ones more so then positive.
So you observe/take in account people's negative traits or positive ones?
Do you expect dirty tricks from others rather then genuine assistance?
Your posts seem to have a Ti nature to them, organzied/structured.
"He seldom gives in to fear, hatred, and other negative emotions, rarely gets surprised and rarely envies. The more dangerous the situation, the more self-disciplined and resolute he becomes."
That's what I see and sense in you.
Do you dictate things to people?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-13-2010 at 07:32 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I never really had a strong opinion on your type, though if I had to guess Ne/Si quadra sounds most probable from what I've seen. You come off like a jovial, easy-going, inoffensive sort of guy, on here at least
If I may ask;
Do you relate to the info on LSE at all Absurd, if so, what parts?
EII INFj
Forum status: retired