Hello...
How are everyone?
I have a question and hope there is answer for him.
In the test was my functions in this order:
Fi,Ni,Fe,Si=Te,Ti,Se,Ne
What is my personality type?
Thank everyone.
Hello everyone, what is my personality type?
Hello...
How are everyone?
I have a question and hope there is answer for him.
In the test was my functions in this order:
Fi,Ni,Fe,Si=Te,Ti,Se,Ne
What is my personality type?
Thank everyone.
Well, frequently tests are misleading, and there is no socionics type with that precise ordering of functions, strong to weak. However, should you decide to investigate your type further, I would say this tests suggests you should look at the types EII, IEI, and SEI first.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
FYI
personality type =/= psychological type.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I can't guess of which test you speak, but if it was a socionics one, there's usually a disclaimer of sorts that only first few results matter (i.e. ordering of functions with weaker results doesn't matter so much), which would point to EII or IEI as most likely types. If it was some generic "cognitive processes" test, keep in mind that every theory interprets original Jungian functions differently. So, just start with socionics as if you never did the test.
Dear,
We can't possibly help with this regard with one post. Some suggestions...
1. Read up on the functions (you can find them here or on the wikisocion site)
2. Hang around and get a the16types tan....
3. take a year or so to decide, keep a journal explore yourself from your view and the views of the people around you (that's how I did it and it seemed to work ok).
4. Post and have fun...don't take life too seriously.
Good luck and many people here can help if you need it.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why is EII being suggested when Ne was the lowest scoring function?
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Everyone are good. How is you?Originally Posted by CidRa
Hello...
How are everyone?
I have a question and hope there is answer for him.
In the test was my functions in this order:
Fi,Ni,Fe,Si=Te,Ti,Se,Ne
What is my personality type?
Thank everyone.
I hope there are answer for him too.
Your type is:wink:.
Sorry.
Thank everyone.
Thank you.
I know that no one can say of the functions, but only
I wanted to know your suggestions because the order is confusing.
My tests in Socionics usually are either INTp or INFp to here no problem, but what I know is that
in ILI be Fi higher than Fe and in IEI be Fe higher then Fi.
I convinced that Fi higher to me but I have Fi,Fe highest of Te,Ti.
In Socionics Type Assistant:I be in Normal mode INTp
while in Reversed mode INFp.
When I asked my friends about if I'm more T or F,
some them say T and the some other say F.
My family says you are T but influenced.
Right tests sometimes not be accurate but I convinced in a result.
With this maybe I'm not IEI or ILI.
Note:
English is not my native language for this I hope your understanding.
I believe the most probabilistic element is the mobilizing function. Once a person figures that one out they are likely to determine type. It also helps to eliminate any quadras that you know immediately you aren't in. For instance, I am 100% I am not in tune with beta values so I can eliminate those possibilities without much fear of error.
If you have a video of yourself in an involved discussion that you very much enjoy with other people, it will reveal your type very easily. I recommend against picture VI since it is the most theoretical aspect of Socionics and seems to be more a creative and playful outlet for Socionic veterans to seek entertainment and some universal visual method of type identification that probably doesn't really exist objectively.
What reasons or explanations do they give you when offering suggestions that you may be either F or T type?
When my mom offered suggestion of me being an F type, she said that I use Ne in a way that when an idea makes an impact on my world view I get swept away with it emotionally...hence she interpreted that to be NF....and that I am active in the way I address my ideas, or talk about them with others without really considering T...possible realistic look at these and not NT either which is more of an analytic theory or possibility of other ideas or factors and how those may play into my thoughts....rigidness, she said would give the J (other things were also observed here, like liking a certain structure and routine) factor to me and my extremely empathetic, kind, and loving nature gives me my Fi; it took many many conversions for this summary that I am providing you with now, and again my mom is INTp type so she has her perspective on my type...your relations may have another depending on what type they are, but generally I find T types to be more objective (and they use a lot less of the word "I feel" when analyzing you).
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I do not have and do not forget different languages.
Those who say that I am "T"
their reasoning is that I critical, dialectical, rigorous and likes justice.
Those who say that I am "F"
their reasoning is that I sensitive, rapid irritable and assistant.
why do you write in big letters? (does it seem to you that we do not read what you are writing? or that we can't hear you?)
what do you mean when you say that you are rigorous?
How old are you?
You seem to me to be
LII
maybe on a slight note SEI
types so far
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-13-2010 at 06:03 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
give percentages and I'll analyze it from the statistics....
no, I like it only.
Then why make in a situation not people use his.
I think 'disciplinary' more appropriate and who say this my parents.
21
Interesting.
I like it and I like to see you do it, it's kinda fun and new.
How do you feel about food, sensations derived or experienced from activities and smells, or other senses, like vision or taste. Would you say that you have very good senses and know what makes you feel good inside?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
any percentages?
What do you mean analyze it from the statistics?
I not do say this maybe you guess it.
For foods I eat what I like as long as no harm is clear.
What I do not like him so do not I try even its experience.
In any case I do not eat much at meals and this makes my mom angry.
I have a special opinion in anything often a different for my family or at least one of them.
I mean with the function order, did it tell you how much you prefered one function than the other....
any percentages?
What do you mean analyze it from the statistics?
like 40 points into Fi
32 points into Fe
21 points into Se
20 points into Ni
19 points into Te
5 points into Si
Etc.....
or something like
83% Fi
75% Si
55% Te
54% Fe
etc.....
or did it just give you the list
Does not have a percentage.
What do you think is more important to adhear or follow
Your own personal values and morals ()
Or that of your own traditional one, of your families or cultures? (
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
A forum thread does not your self reveal. An aid it may be, yes, but that is all.
What do you think is more important to adhear or follow
Your own personal values and morals (
Or that of your own traditional one, of your families or cultures? (
If you do not represented on the others if then it will benefit you.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
