What are you asking for?
Ok then EII or IEI.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-14-2010 at 03:24 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Idk about VI, but I'd assume the average elf is Delta. (Peaceful, Live centuries [Old Age = Delta?])
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Looks NF to me (soft, distant gaze). What the heck, I'll guess IEI.
I'd agree that Tolkien's elves, anyway, seem Delta (Delta NF, mostly). Other works portray them differently, of course -- the impish, mischevious variety of elves seem more Merry, Alpha or Beta.
Quaero Veritas.
INFjs seem into elves so i'll say INFj. INFj Arctures is into furry animals.
hehe
The end is nigh
The only cool elves are the ones from Tolkien's Silmarillion; they did stuff like make swords out of crystals and did battle with 40-foot demons by dodging around Matrix-style and stabbing the shit out of them, and he actually managed to make it sound epic (unlike the bazillion authors that copied his shit later on). The ones in the Lord of the Rings were total pussies compared to their ancestors; if Feanor or Fingolfin got wind that their descendants sat on their asses and then ran away when war was knocking on their front door, they would have flogged the shit out of Elrond til his immortal ass was as red as the flames of Mt. Doom. And basically anyone who tried to write about elves, goblins, gryphons, dwarves and warlocks after Tolkien pretty much sucked it up and isn't worth discussing.
I was thinking the other day about how it's interesting to see how animators draw characters and how they might be really easy to VI, given the fact that the writers usually have some sort of stereotype in mind. For instance, we saw Shrek 4 the other day. I had never seen any of the previous movies but I was thinking that the donkey is probably ILE, Shrek, SEI and his wife (can't remember the name), SLE.
IEI-Fe 4w3
No wai. Shrek is SLI if there ever was one. The Donkey is Eddie Murphy, and therefore inherently ESE. The chick is maybe some bratty ass SEE, lol.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
alright, SLI is fairly close to SEI. The chick is some Se type.
IEI-Fe 4w3
V.I,
I met her yesterday.
your dual.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html