Just to put an end to this argument(?). Fire away.
What's my type [Part two]
Just to put an end to this argument(?). Fire away.
ESTp
When you see me crying (Fe) you wake up to comfort me..lol
You have a gentle soul.
Who said Se egos are brute, mean and harsh?
Well, they were wrong.
Try talking to Allie, see if you guys hit it off.
Strategy example here... Ti recognizing...
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/604208-post30.html
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/650162-post99.html
get to the point, be honest and fortwright...
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/650132-post95.html
ESTp's are very sensitive and kind as are most ESFp's
I hate individual biases and what "image" people have built to these types...the only thing that makes us conflictors is that you don't emphasize on Te, plainly that you are not as strict with order and control of surroundings as TeSi is and therefore it drives me crazy, and also that you don't amass or are not as interested in reading up on lots of objective information like Te's do and so I get bored and frustrated of your limited world view focus (you don't provide me with any information to shift through and catagorize, or listen to and enjoy, aka, you're too focused on living and feelings.), so to say....that's all dear.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-09-2010 at 05:25 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
When was that ? And, if you mean, what I think you mean, I'm not the only ESTp that fits the bill. It's like saying some ESTps typed me Delta, and some, Beta or at least tried to.Originally Posted by Maritsa33
Yep, that's because I studied it.
Haha. That was something. A guy accusing me of the exact things he did himself. Very, fucking, mature
If that means literally yacking all the time about nothing and grinning whilst doing it, then no.
In the new delta lounge I was in.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ah, the famous New Delta rising like a phoenix from the ashes. I liked what you did with the room. The walls were red with a bit of black and brown here and there. Very modern.
But to the point. I did some good that day, comforting you and stuff. I always thought I'm good at being bad, but no. Thanks for clearing this up.
Always to the point...such SLE trait.
Yeah you did do some good that day...the question is what effects do me saying that you're a "good person and that you did good" have on you?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Like in "patting me on my back, throwing a bone saying 'good doggy'" ? Well, might find out soon enough, so stay tuned
No, I was serious...in serious context. If I said that how would you react?Like in "patting me on my back, throwing a bone saying 'good doggy'" ? Well, might find out soon enough, so stay tuned
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ah, I know what you're trying to do. Could you rephrase it or, I don't know, use some other question I would be not aware of how to answer immediately. Surprise me.
Motive
I'm trying to understand that if you have Fi PoLR and my natural inclination is to recognize distinct qualities in individuals that I see as "notable" or "noteworthy" and I offer praise like "that was so good of you to do, honey" How will you react to what I say to you? Will you brush it off or focus on my bad traits..??
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The thing is, you're confined by system, a set of rules, by which one tries to determine one's type and it ain't that simple when you're facing someone who, actually, knows how to bypass it, but to answer you question, I would say "no problem".
Removed at User Request
SLI I think
I think SLIs are much more politically correct but then again this is the internet so...
ISTJ-Ti and I'm pretty confident of this.
much better
What does it mean ? I think you're missing some info in regards to me.
Hmm ? So far it's SLE, SLI, LSI
SLI
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
posting style and general impression - SLI
why?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LSE > SLI. Beta ST isn't working for me at all. For one, your intertype relations suggest Delta > Beta. I got great dual vibes from the very beginning of talking to you, and I think that's become even more apparent. You often say things in chat that make me laugh how much it reminds me of other LSEs. I think that your enneagram type points to LSE much more than SLI. I also think it might be hard for other people to tell what type you are because you're fairly closed-off about yourself, but when I get glimpses of your nature, it screams LSE to me. I don't want to get too personal my explanation, though.
No doubt, it's difficult to know with any certainty based on a few posts. I've seen maybe a dozen of Absurd's posts over the last few months - I've not followed them closely. Regardless, I get the impression generally his posts are infrequent, one or two liners, reminiscent of ISTps. The only time I've witnessed Absurd in an 'lengthy' exchange was in the new Delta Lounge thread attempting to console Maritsa. If I recall correctly, he was intoxicated somewhat. For an IXTp imo, that means loosening up to show a little, not necessarily a natural state when sober.
That was actually aNo doubt, it's difficult to know with any certainty based on a few posts. I've seen maybe a dozen of Absurd's posts over the last few months - I've not followed them closely. Regardless, I get the impression generally his posts are infrequent, one or two liners, reminiscent of ISTps. The only time I've witnessed Absurd in an 'lengthy' exchange was in the new Delta Lounge thread attempting to console Maritsa. If I recall correctly, he was intoxicated somewhat. For an IXTp imo, that means loosening up to show a little
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He was intoxicated, Maritsa. It was a moment of weakness I'm sure he'd like to forget right about now.That was actually a
I'd say SLI over LSE, but if you want supervised... *shrug*
Well, I've noticed with SLI's, when I say something good to them, they get all giddy inside...humm your response makes me wonder.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's not exactly the truth. That was done on purpose. Everything I do is done on purpose.
That's not me. That's my older sister. Need a pic. Ask and you shall receive.
About what ?
Removed at User Request
Absurd
Talk about emotions now, please, if you will.
Do you like to see them?
Do you like others to show them?
How do you feel around people with strong demonstrative emotions?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Calm down, will youThere's no need to, all that is required is to search the web for Fedor
Yeah, nothing over the top, but, yeah.
Bad and furious
Removed at User Request
What's there to assume - you said I am one
Oh, I didn't realize this thread was about you lol You're TeSi, I don't think you're Beta at all. I know a couple of more introverted TeSi and you seem exactly like them. At least in the chat, your
Thanks, sky
Removed at User Request
You're retracting now. I don't if it is common for you to do so, but if it is, one might be tempted to think of all your typings you made in a bad light, in other words, bollocks.
I never had a chance(?) to talk with them. You telling me, they have this little spreadsheet with all the correct typings ? Lemme see it
I have the spreadsheet. I'll send it to you for $1000 plus you have to show me a picture of yourself.
I never had a chance(?) to talk with them. You telling me, they have this little spreadsheet with all the correct typings ? Lemme see it
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
It's not worth it, just charge him the full price.
Yeah, and make it a full body shot, naked. I have a spreadsheet too. I'm working on a theory of symmetry, and am collecting data.
Removed at User Request
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
