Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 49

Thread: The Pluses and Minuses

  1. #1
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default The Pluses and Minuses

    Okay, I need someone to clear up a few questions for me about the plus and minus version of socionics, you know, with -Se and +Se, etc. So, I get that it can be useful insofar as it basically denotes which other function the IM in question is blocked with. But after that I really don't get it, so I have questions.

    1) Why + and - as the symbols? What is the rule governing which Se (blocked with Ti or blocked with Fi) is + and which one is -? Or are the symbols just arbitrary, and it would be just as easy to label it *Se and ^Se?

    2) What is the deal with one's superid functions being different + and - than one's dual's ego functions? That is, when I tried to read up a little on the plus-and-minus-socionics, I was very confused by the fact that IEI superid is, I think, +Se and -Ti, whereas SLE ego is, I think, -Se and +Ti. What does that signify/mean/imply?

    3) How do I know how to assign + and -? Like, how would I figure out if it's Beta Ni is + and Gamma Ni is -, or Beta Ni is - and Gamma Ni is +?
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  2. #2
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9 View Post
    1) Why + and - as the symbols? What is the rule governing which Se (blocked with Ti or blocked with Fi) is + and which one is -? Or are the symbols just arbitrary, and it would be just as easy to label it *Se and ^Se?
    Symbols. Plus is expanding, Minus is reducing. Also IIRC, in model B -Se is in fact "-Se/+Si", etc. (these have fancy descriptions somewhere there, methinks).

    For rule, see answer to (3).

    2) What is the deal with one's superid functions being different + and - than one's dual's ego functions? That is, when I tried to read up a little on the plus-and-minus-socionics, I was very confused by the fact that IEI superid is, I think, +Se and -Ti, whereas SLE ego is, I think, -Se and +Ti. What does that signify/mean/imply?
    IEI's superid is -Se +Ti. Blocks have the same polarity, always. There's no +Se -Ti.

    3) How do I know how to assign + and -? Like, how would I figure out if it's Beta Ni is + and Gamma Ni is -, or Beta Ni is - and Gamma Ni is +?
    SF and NT blocks have +NS and -TF - that is, internal with external results in plus irrational and minus rational. ST and NF have -NS and +TF.

    The easier way to remember is that Democratic quadras have (+) irrational and (-) rational elements, Aristocratic quadras (-) irrational and (+) rational.

  3. #3
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  4. #4
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    Symbols. Plus is expanding, Minus is reducing. Also IIRC, in model B -Se is in fact "-Se/+Si", etc. (these have fancy descriptions somewhere there, methinks).

    For rule, see answer to (3).
    Oh, yeah, that's right. What do "expanding" and "reducing" mean? I mean, generally, I'm sure in actuality they're as complicated as every term in socionics.

    IEI's superid is -Se +Ti. Blocks have the same polarity, always. There's no +Se -Ti.
    Cool. I must have remembered that wrong. But -Se = -Se/+Si?

    SF and NT blocks have +NS and -TF - that is, internal with external results in plus irrational and minus rational. ST and NF have -NS and +TF.

    The easier way to remember is that Democratic quadras have (+) irrational and (-) rational elements, Aristocratic quadras (-) irrational and (+) rational.
    Got it! Thanks.

    Now, what is the use of this system besides having a fancy way to say Beta Ti and Alpha Ti? Which, if I apply the rule correctly is +Ti (beta) and -Ti (alpha).
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  5. #5
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's a typo in that article (it says - = rather than ). How do I go in and fix it?
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  6. #6
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What typo?

    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9 View Post
    Now, what is the use of this system besides having a fancy way to say Beta Ti and Alpha Ti? Which, if I apply the rule correctly is +Ti (beta) and -Ti (alpha).
    +Ti means Beta-or-Delta Ti, so it's a fancier way of saying "Ti blocked with Se". I, for one, appreciate the simplicity and elegance of it.

    Also, from my point of view it seems to make sense that democrats expand perception and aristocrats expand judgment. Another thing about plus/minus is that it's in sync with process/result dichotomy (+ base element is process, - is result), called evolutionary/involutionary in context of forms of thinkings. Process/result also means "in right supervision ring"/"in left supervision ring", and in this way +/- is also related to quadra progression (+ elements progressively and - elements regressively).

  7. #7
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    + means left in the sequence N T S F N relative to the function it is paired with
    - means right in said sequence relative to the function it is paired with

    NT: N+ T-
    ST: T+ S-
    SF: S+ F-
    NF: F+ N-

    The main reason they are useful is that they allow you to explain the small cycle Reinin dichotomies in terms of function properties:
    Taciturn: +Object, -Field
    Narrator: +Field, -Object
    Aristocrat: +Judging, -Perceiving
    Democrat: +Perceiving, -Judging
    Process: +Accepting, -Creating (or producing, creative, or whatever)
    Result: +Creating, -Accepting
    Positivist: +Empowering, -Limiting (yes, you need Limiting/Empowering for this one too)
    Negativist: +Limiting, -Empowering

  8. #8
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it's all bullshit, frankly. It has no core ground for me. The +Se/-Se model B function theory. Hitta likes it but I mean, I never really saw the point. It has just like no objective oomph holding everything together.

  9. #9
    Crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,097
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well... Is it accurate?
    ILI (FINAL ANSWER)

  10. #10
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh, okay. You guys have definitely demonstrated that it is valid and potentially useful, but I don't really like or care about the Reinin dichotomies right now, so I'm going to continue to ignore the pluses and minuses. But at least I'll understand what other people mean when they use them!
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  11. #11
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The +/- signs also emphasize the use of types rather than functions, because it weakens the notion that similarity between adjacent quadras can be attributed to shared functions.

  12. #12
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The thing is, if you actually OBSERVE people, you CAN see similarities between neighboring quadra members that are very clearly related to their shared functions; I've had quite a few friends for whom I've teetered between SLE and SEE, especially my best friend; he's SEE, which is clear to me at this point in knowing him and knowing Socionics, but there are so many similarities between he and clear-cut SLEs that I know, right down to the bodily movements, that I can't feel bad for wavering a bit.

  13. #13
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    The +/- signs also emphasize the use of types rather than functions, because it weakens the notion that similarity between adjacent quadras can be attributed to shared functions.
    I would say it actually emphasizes more subtle differences while retaining basic similarity (i.e. -Ni is still closer to +Ni than to either flavour of Ne, making Beta and Gamma meet there).

  14. #14
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  15. #15
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would say it actually emphasizes more subtle differences while retaining basic similarity (i.e. -Ni is still closer to +Ni than to either flavour of Ne, making Beta and Gamma meet there).
    Under the model B, delta is said to favor +Te and -Ti. So that means the similarity between delta and alpha would be attributed to the judging rather than perceiving axis.

    Also, between ESTj and INTj, for example, instead of basing the relation on shared valued (both Si/Ne valuers), they would base it on a shared strength (Te+/Ti- strength).

  16. #16
    The Looks stanprollyright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    In your pants
    TIM
    IEE-Ne cp 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    +/- is redundant but it can be a good way to think about the differences in the way elements are used based on what they are blocked with.
    Stan is not my real name.

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My belief is that +/- refers to whether when using a function we ask ourselves how it applies to us or the world first. Although the subjective position is always '+', minus functions always refer to the subjective position first. Plus functions always refer to the objective situation first, and then the subjective position as the means to do something about it. This is why '+' is involved in the "process" of taking action, while '-' tries to see the "result" of actions already taken.

    Basically,
    + = process ("what should be done, what I'm going to do")
    - = result ("what I have done, what happened because of it")

    However, it's more complex than that, because subtype comes into the equation as well. "Result" and "process" most often describe how accepting subtypes use the functions; producing subtype use +,- differently.

    +/- (producing subtype)
    + = "What I may do, how the world will change"
    - = "what is the situation is, how I can cope"

  18. #18
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly View Post
    The thing is, if you actually OBSERVE people, you CAN see similarities between neighboring quadra members that are very clearly related to their shared functions; I've had quite a few friends for whom I've teetered between SLE and SEE, especially my best friend; he's SEE, which is clear to me at this point in knowing him and knowing Socionics, but there are so many similarities between he and clear-cut SLEs that I know, right down to the bodily movements, that I can't feel bad for wavering a bit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    I would say it actually emphasizes more subtle differences while retaining basic similarity (i.e. -Ni is still closer to +Ni than to either flavour of Ne, making Beta and Gamma meet there).
    These.
    You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it.

  19. #19
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    638
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why do people people on this forum always complicate the easy things?
    + just means you strive for something.
    - just means you avoid something.


    +Ti = organization and logic
    -Ti = avoiding chaos and logical mistakes

    +Te = efficiency and stability
    -Te = avoiding financial disasters

    +Fi = good relations
    -Fi = avoiding bad relations

    +Fe = having fun
    -Fe = avoiding misery

    +Ni = taking risks
    -Ni = avoiding danger

    +Ne = breakthroughs and revolutions
    -Ne = avoiding stagnation

    +Si = having comfort
    -Si = avoiding discomfort

    +Se = striving for power
    -Se = avoiding powerlessness




    Examples:

    * Betas want to have fun, no matter if it causes misery for themselves or others (+Fe).
    * Alphas also have fun, of course, but they rather try to avoid misery for themeselves and others (-Fe).

    *Alphas strive for revolutions and scientific breakthroughs (+Ne).
    *Deltas also like unusual ideas but they rather try to avoid complete stagnation (-Ne).

    *Gammas take risks no matter if it causes a global economy crisis (+Ni).
    *Betas also take risks sometimes but they tend to avoid dangerous situations (-Ni).
    Last edited by JohnDo; 06-10-2010 at 03:56 PM.

  20. #20
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why do people people on this forum always complicate the easy things?
    Because your easy definitions suck and don't work.

  21. #21
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Those descriptions are horrible.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  22. #22
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  23. #23
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think saying INTjs avoid Ti makes any sense when the definition of Ti is left unchanged. This principle seems to match Valued/Unvalued better.

    + is probably more along the lines of something you have a confident attitude towards, and - something you have a cautious attitude towards. These are the interpretations smilingeyes used.

    So: + and Valued: you confidently pursue this
    - and Valued: you cautiously pursue this

  24. #24
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDo View Post
    -Fe = avoiding bad relations
    You mean -Fi, right?

    *Gammas take risks no matter if it causes a global economy crisis (+Ni).
    *Betas also take risks sometimes but they tend to avoid dangerous situations (-Ni).
    Yes, well, that's one of the reasons I wonder if it's really this simple. Compare your example of +Ni to -Te. One thing I cannot identify is this risk taking... I'm pretty sure I'm either not +Ni or this definition is inaccurate.

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    I don't think saying INTjs avoid Ti makes any sense when the definition of Ti is left unchanged. This principle seems to match Valued/Unvalued better.

    + is probably more along the lines of something you have a confident attitude towards, and - something you have a cautious attitude towards. These are the interpretations smilingeyes used.

    So: + and Valued: you confidently pursue this
    - and Valued: you cautiously pursue this
    I still think (+) as maximizing positives and (-) as minimizing negatives make sense. What's flawed in JohnDo's examples is that he doesn't take into account that while one takes priority over the other, both are still aimed at - so while expanding (+) opportunities, risks are still limited (-) within this constraint. Benefit isn't in inverse proportion to risks as a rule.

  25. #25
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDo View Post
    Why do people people on this forum always complicate the easy things?
    + just means you strive for something.
    - just means you avoid something.


    +Ti = organization and logic
    -Ti = avoiding chaos and logical mistakes

    +Te = efficiency and stability
    -Te = avoiding financial disasters

    +Fi = good relations
    -Fe = avoiding bad relations

    +Fe = having fun
    -Fe = avoiding misery

    +Ni = taking risks
    -Ni = avoiding danger

    +Ne = breakthroughs and revolutions
    -Ne = avoiding stagnation

    +Si = having comfort
    -Si = avoiding discomfort

    +Se = striving for power
    -Se = avoiding powerlessness
    Hmmm. I seem to favor the negative side on all of these. Does this mean I join the theta quadra now?
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  26. #26
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    Hmmm. I seem to favor the negative side on all of these. Does this mean I join the theta quadra now?
    . Yes.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  27. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You should also understand that for some people (namely Hitta) the polarities are reversed. Thus you get an LII that, in Che's words, "strives" for organization, and an LSI that avoids making mistakes.

    But add the shadow circuit to the mix, and things get even more complicated. Any LII can either strive to control or to avoid any element, but those tendencies are divided between the ego and the id.

  28. #28
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg View Post
    You should also understand that for some people (namely Hitta) the polarities are reversed. Thus you get an LII that, in Che's words, "strives" for organization, and an LSI that avoids making mistakes.

    But add the shadow circuit to the mix, and things get even more complicated. Any LII can either strive to control or to avoid any element, but those tendencies are divided between the ego and the id.
    tcaud don't take this the wrong way man, but what are you trying to achieve with such a complicated model?
    You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it.

  29. #29
    Crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,097
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    World Domination of course.
    ILI (FINAL ANSWER)

  30. #30
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    638
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat
    Because your easy definitions suck and don't work.
    Once again, I don't get the impression that you are Ti-ego. Always want to complicate the easy stuff...

    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9
    Those descriptions are horrible.
    Because Betas and Gammas are described as evil again? Just don't take it personally...

    Quote Originally Posted by Pinocchio
    In any of the cases, taking higher risks is Beta all the day, whose Ni is "-", while Gammas, who are daring too, they value stability and don't push things to the extreme (usually taking measures with care, as much ash possible). Gamma has "+Ni" so it doesn't fit in.
    No, I don't think so. ENFjs always warn others about trouble and avoid dangerous situations (-Ni). ENTjs like to take more risks (+Ni). For INFp and INTp it is the same: INFps are rather careful people, not inclined to take greater risks than INTps...

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat
    I don't think saying INTjs avoid Ti makes any sense when the definition of Ti is left unchanged.
    They don't avoid Ti, they just avoid problems concerning this information element. Benefits of Ti are organization and logic, that's what ISTjs strive for. INTjs rather avoid chaos and logical mistakes by using Ti - but they are not really interested in organizing everything and they don't necessarily think that everything always has to be logical...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss
    You mean -Fi, right?
    Yes, just a typo...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss
    Yes, well, that's one of the reasons I wonder if it's really this simple. Compare your example of +Ni to -Te. One thing I cannot identify is this risk taking... I'm pretty sure I'm either not +Ni or this definition is inaccurate.
    It is only a tendency, of course. Do you think INFps take more risks than you do? That's what has to be compared...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss
    What's flawed in JohnDo's examples is that he doesn't take into account that while one takes priority over the other, both are still aimed at - so while expanding (+) opportunities, risks are still limited (-) within this constraint. Benefit isn't in inverse proportion to risks as a rule.
    My examples are simplified, of course. I just wanted to stress the main points. Funny thing is, once again I am criticised for my -Ti which exactly means "avoiding chaos". Those who value +Ti would rather like to see detailed descriptions instead of "avoiding chaos" descriptions (-Ti).
    Last edited by JohnDo; 06-10-2010 at 04:00 PM.

  31. #31
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No, I don't think so. ENFjs always warn others about trouble and avoid dangerous situations (-Ni). ENTjs like to take more risks (+Ni). For INFp and INTp it is the same: INFps are rather careful people, not inclined to take greater risks than INTps...
    INTps have Ni+ and are characteristically known for warning people about risks and dangers:

    Quote Originally Posted by I. Weisband; socioniko.net]"Imagination directs me". He possesses a powerful, intellectual imagination. A representative of this type, Honoré de Balzac, in his series of novels, The Human Comedy "painted" the portraits of more than 2000 people who appear hyper real: "he is comparable perhaps only to the city controller's office" —wrote of him Andre Maurois. Similarly, the phantasmagoric world of Gabriel García Marquez is impressively precise in every detail. Due to this quality The Critic can forecast the future quite well. From empirical observations of how a man acts at various times he creates something like a functional model in his mind. In general, he tends to know everything in advance. [b]If he did not have to warn other people about possible dangers (opportunities interest him less), he most possibly would feel himself redundant.[/b][/quote]

    [quote="Gulenko; socionics.com
    INTps are very sceptical to others who are undertaking new beginnings. They are able to pour cold water on others burning enthusiasm. They try to keep others from being passionate as they consider strong emotions to be harmful. INTps also look after their health and can be very captious in these matters. For example, they may wash their hands more often than others do. They pay a lot attention to hygiene and sanitation.

  32. #32
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My post got messed up and I can't edit it. The following passage should have been bolded in the topmost paragraph:

    If he did not have to warn other people about possible dangers (opportunities interest him less), he most possibly would feel himself redundant.

  33. #33
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    638
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    INTps have Ni+ and are characteristically known for warning people about risks and dangers:
    Okay, good point. But the more important question is: Who takes greater risks? INFp or INTp?

  34. #34
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  35. #35
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,015
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDo View Post
    My examples are simplified, of course. I just wanted to stress the main points. Funny thing is, once again I am criticised for my -Ti which exactly means "avoiding chaos". Those who value +Ti would rather like to see detailed descriptions instead of "avoiding chaos" descriptions (-Ti).
    No, you aren't criticized for avoiding chaos. You're criticized for adding to chaos by misleading descriptions.

    The main problem with many of these is that you focus on wrong negative/positive aspects. In several cases, you focus on negatives which result from lack of the element, whereas it should be negatives that result from its abundance. For example:

    +Ti = organization and logic
    -Ti = avoiding chaos and logical mistakes
    +Ti = using organization and logic when they might be helpful - perceived as "bringing order"
    -Ti = avoiding systems and structures that aren't necessary (Ockham's razor, Zen of Python and such) - perceived as "avoiding constraints"

    Also, what labcoat said. I'd say Gilly got it right about Ni earlier.

  36. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I use Ti- to determine how I should think. I use Ti+ to criticize others' use of Ti-. (particularly to impress upon them that what they think is possible isn't, because the rules are what they are).

    In several cases, you focus on negatives which result from lack of the element, whereas it should be negatives that result from its abundance. For example:
    Correction: both are accurate depending on how the person uses it. Conservative leaners tend to criticize the abundance, liberal leaners the lack.
    Last edited by tcaudilllg; 06-11-2010 at 12:17 AM.

  37. #37
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    Hmmm. I seem to favor the negative side on all of these. Does this mean I join the theta quadra now?
    No, but it does mean you are an E9.

  38. #38
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly View Post
    No, but it does mean you are an E9.
    I'm quite sure (about 95%) that I'm an E5. But E9 is the type I second most identify with.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  39. #39
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9 View Post
    Okay, I need someone to clear up a few questions for me about the plus and minus version of socionics, you know, with -Se and +Se, etc. So, I get that it can be useful insofar as it basically denotes which other function the IM in question is blocked with. But after that I really don't get it, so I have questions.

    1) Why + and - as the symbols? What is the rule governing which Se (blocked with Ti or blocked with Fi) is + and which one is -? Or are the symbols just arbitrary, and it would be just as easy to label it *Se and ^Se?
    + =>> evolution. rapid social progress.
    - <<= involution. careful social progress with periodic regression.

    2) What is the deal with one's superid functions being different + and - than one's dual's ego functions? That is, when I tried to read up a little on the plus-and-minus-socionics, I was very confused by the fact that IEI superid is, I think, +Se and -Ti, whereas SLE ego is, I think, -Se and +Ti. What does that signify/mean/imply?
    I think it's that you're receptive to your dual's output but generate the opposite sign.

    So IEI would be receptive to -Se in their superid, but generate +Se if they ever try to use that function. There's some theoretical + - + - cycle in Model A that I kind find an explanation for.

    It seems to suggest that semi-dual relations aren't all they're cut out to be, since you can sort of generate your semi-dual's base function and don't need it "as much" as your dual's.

    3) How do I know how to assign + and -? Like, how would I figure out if it's Beta Ni is + and Gamma Ni is -, or Beta Ni is - and Gamma Ni is +?
    + = process.
    - = result.
    These are described here.

    there is also another convention that Stratievskaya likes to use. Don't quote me on that though.
    + = positivist.
    - = negativist.

    And rarely you'll see +/- refer to mental/vital in Model A, respectively.
    You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it.

  40. #40
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,008
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dur... I just saw this so I'm going to respond and have a lot of people disagree with me so here it goes.

    Introverted
    -Ti= Analysis, understanding why, getting to the core, understanding how everything fits together
    +Ti= Common sense intelligence, accepting law of the land, systematization of a standard

    +Fi= Universal compassion, non-discriminatory, equality, fear of focused intimacy, Mother Teresa complex
    -Fi= Focused compassion, romantic idealism, flaw finding, need for perfect mate

    +Ni= Views self as just a cog in society, ability to immerse identity with society, ability to lose identity into the group, spiritual neutrality
    -Ni= Views self as "different", need for originality, spiritual thinking, imagination, wants to push the envelope

    +Si= Need to explore the senses, ability to spiritualize the senses, exploration/sexual exploration
    -Si= Neutrality to senses, sensual adaptability, apathy to changes in bodily state

    Extraverted

    +Te=Inability to accept results, obsessive compulsive behavior(the area of ocb depends on the perceiving function), economical perfection, constant adjustment (see-saw effect).
    -Te= Focused, goal oriented, ability to set limits, knows what one wants.

    +Fe= Isolated intimacy to the right person , focused relationships, exclusive.
    -Fe= Fear of isolated intimacy, inclusive, neutral behavior, equality, non-judgmental, hard time showing different people different emotions/behaviors

    +Ne= Views society as bland, feels separated, need to add something new to the world.
    -Ne= Views society as being special, wants to be apart of the network, feels everything is perfect just the way it is

    +Se= Willpower, routine, neutral to conditions,
    -Se= Aggression, force, change, need to better things
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •