Gilly
Sorry, Gilly, but we're trying to keep type discussions out of the Delta Lounge post, and preferably out of that subforum, as much as we can.
Maritsa thinks Gilly is LSE. I think he's at least most likely EIE, but even if he isn't EIE, he is a type that at least values Fe. I generally keep my mind very open about people's types, but I absolutely 100% can't see Gilly as a type with weak and devalued Fe.
all your doing is feeding her idiocy
do you really think this is going to keep her out of fighting in delta? shes just going to find another person to type wrong and bicker about it in your lounge
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
Originally Posted by thePirate
I know, to the first part. But I can't sit there and here about how Gilly is LSE over and over, stated like it's just a fact, without saying ANYTHING. I used to keep quiet and then she'd write about me like I was an ally or in some other way part of her argument.
And I hope if we move conversations up here, she'll get used to talking about people's types here instead of there.
You shouldn't encourage Maritsa and Pinocchio at making ridiculous claims like these by making threads about them.
I kinda think Gilly can take care of himself. You know, delete her posts or something.
Isn't she derailing one of these threads by discussing someone else's type in it by now?And I hope if we move conversations up here, she'll get used to talking about people's types here instead of there.
I'm not trying to "take care of" Gilly. I'm trying to explain to Maritsa that Gilly isn't LSE. And I don't think Gilly would delete posts like that anyway. He'd probably either not care or like the attention.
And yes she does it a lot. I'm thinking about starting a thread on Sneg too. I think there's already an active on on Airborne.
Mariella,
I was not ready for this thread to be started and I was not asking for your advice in the Delta Lounge. Next time, please afford me the freedom to choose my own path and to open up a thread in a typing manner on my own, thanks.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If you retype people anywhere, it can get moved here. Maybe you shouldn't go around retyping everyone all the time.
Post pics of yourself naked.
Removed at User Request
It was in context. You two are on the same level where this issue is concerned.Someone said "Pinocchio"...
Removed at User Request
You have made far less credible typings before.Do we both ridiculously type Gilly as LSE?
Removed at User Request
Justice will visit you. I am merely it's precipitator.
Removed at User Request
Gilly is still an ENTp.
Your face is still an ENTp you mean.
Yeah, most likely a Ti subtype.
I can see Gillard as a Ti-ENTp like me and discojoe. Gillard, let me see a new picture of you, oh Gillard, oh Gillard. Don't be shy, Gill-pill, thine Gilly baby. Don't be coy, mackerel of a Gilly, monarch of a Gilly, medusa of a Gilly, o' a Gilly glee galore.
Gilly is EIE or ILE imo
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
But seriously, EIE. Except when you look at his face, then Ti-ENTp. Everyone look at the face of Gillard, it is momentous.
How could I refuse?
If I'm an ILE, I have to figure out all over again why all of my close friends are Betas and Gammas, why none of my friends are Alphas or Deltas, why SLEs are the easiest type for me to make friends with, why the two friends I have the most eerily in common with are Beta NFs, why all Alphas except for LIIs get on my nerves, why I find Ti types the most attractive personalities, why my LSE mother's caregiving pisses me the fuck off, why EIE descriptions universally fit me to a T while ILE ones work only in bits and pieces, and pretty much rediscover what the functions are about.
This one is a little closer to being candid:
You have lovely hair.
Why not INFj?
Make sense with you being friends with Discojoe who VI's as ESTj.
Maybe all those mistyped people you think are SLE are really ESTj/LSE..
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
...
I'm sorry, the answer is just so obvious that it far supercedes pronounced cheekbones and a ponytail.
The answer entails in your looking for emotional response...you test subjects by posting pictures and random things to get emotional feedback in the form of intonations and mimickery...a very good way of testing that INFj use especially since it's the only tool we have to do it on the internet; Aushra describes the way we look for these qualities in people in real life.
Don't forget that morphologically, you have the nose of an INFj as well. Here's that nose...I love how biology works...
Every description of INFj has taken into account the slightly elongated tip of the INFj nose...you can see that in the Socionics.com webpage description as well.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ugh...
What the fuck are you rambling about now?
nevermind...another topic on my mind. Why are you in such a bad mood? Why are you always in such a bad mood?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Obviously.
Yeah. I understand Gilly a lot too. Like....just naturally. And he definitely VIs as EIE. Look at the emotional undercurrents in his face. ENTps are just less emotional than that. They are like more 'firm' in a way, ya know? Like more concretely logical.
And mirror is the quadra-relationship that gets along the least. Still good, but....and well, that also helps describe our relationship. I've always liked Gilly, but never was like super crazy about him the way I would be a dual or identical. Sometimes in brief flashes I will really admire or respect him though but it fades out pretty quickly. (granted there is often non-socionics factors playing in here too but, I mean I'm obviously talking in an ideal 'all things considered' sort of way)
He hardly looks directly into the camera, is melencholic and introverted. He hardly smiles. So what if you get along with him, that doesn't mean anything. I get along famously with my mom who is ILI type, that doesn't mean I'm in the same quad as she is.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
Someone who values Fi says that you are "narcissistic"; I haven't known you long enough to know if this is true or not...but it wouldn't point to any direction; the question is, if you make a promise to someone, will you deliver?
One of my INFj friends is very narcissistic and a pain to deal with now...so it doesn't point to a type in my opinion.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Socionics needs to have some sort of objective foundation or it's worthless. But yeah I can manipulate myself to get along with any other type by pretending to be their dual. Maybe that's the key...I get along famously with my mom who is ILI type, that doesn't mean I'm in the same quad as she is.
And well no offense but I just don't think you know what you're talking about when it comes to socionics. It's not a big deal I guess, since if you fanwank everything to make sense in your own mind, it can still be of useful to you, individually.
Foundations are functions. You havn't actually lived with Gilly to know how he is in real life and internet communication is hardly the way to know how he really is like or what relations he will have with you. I don't see mirroring relations between you and him like between Mariella and I or Minde and Mariella; you have not really presented any circumstance or situation where you have misunderstood him and asked or clairified your conversation with him...that to me shows no mirroring effect.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
