Leading Te, I say ESTj not ENTj.
Cause i'm lazy, i'll just go (Basically I just copied and pasted the post, it's probably easier just to open the link):
I've sort of followed your conversation with Airborne here and I have to say that I disagree with you in your pursuit, and rather also your typing of him as being non-delta.Originally Posted by Aiss
As much as it might please some people to conveniently re-package him as another brand due to some of the 'controversial' things he's said - as regarded by some parties, unfortunately that's not a good enought reason.
In regards to his type, extraversion seems obvious to me, and his posts, whether you agree with what he's actually saying or not are just fact..fact.fact.fact..fact based on actual objective things, Te dominant.
I simply copied his last post of more than one or two sentences:
Regardless of whether anyone agrees with him, that's Te he's using, and dominant Te too.Originally Posted by Airborne
Actually, I don't particularly have an opinion either way on whether I agree with him, but his thought processes, how he produces his information, is something that I can understand where he's coming from, on a cognitive level, he shares the same ego functions as me.
Also, to further support he has Si in his ego block, observe his respond to the ISFj Minde:
Notice he's standing up for himself to Minde and is repelled by her Se (as he's Si ie not ENTj).Originally Posted by Airborne
OK as much as anyone might not agree with the Si or the other stuff, fair enough, but it can be seen in his quoted post, and it's not hard to find him in other posts talking that way....routed in objective fact after objective fact after objective fact, which is leading Te (esp if we consider it's just naturally rolling off his tongue so to speak, it's his base function and therefore area of 'security).
Don't see why can be any other lead function.