Which information elements are you most interested in?

[tcaudilllg]

For me, it's Ni, Se, Fe, and Ti. I have the least interest in Te and Si, and a passive interest in Fi and Ne.

[xerx]

So you're more Beta than Alpha. Is that what you're saying?

[tcaudilllg]

So you're more Beta than Alpha. Is that what you're saying?

I said nothing of the sort.

[Nowisthetime]

Ni seems cool

[anou]

.

[tcaudilllg]

Do you mean perceiving as a ego function or input from others or just wanting to understand it as a socionics functions?

I mean which elements you're interested in, as far as your daily life is concerned.

If you were to classify the information you are most interested in in terms of information elements, which elements would those be?

Put it this way: which information ASPECTS most strike your fancy?

[anou]

.

[The Exception]

Do you mean perceiving as a ego function or input from others or just wanting to understand it as a socionics functions?

In terms of perceiving it as an ego function or input from others, this would be consistent with my ego and super-ID functions, respectively.

In terms of wanting to understand it as a socionics function, I'd say , , and . In other words, my unvalued functions minus the role.

Put it this way: which information ASPECTS most strike your fancy?

, , , and . All my valued functions.

[silverchris9]

Hmmm... I don't really want to know the deeper theoretical aspects of Se. I know that it's a label for an energy that I feel, and that's as far as I really *want* to go with it, all other motives aside. I'm honestly most interested in IMs from my superego/opposing quadra. What is Si? How does it work? What about Te? Fe I'm very slightly interested in. It would be useful to know what Ne is better in order to differentiate it from Ni more clearly, but I honestly don't care much about it. So... I'm interested in my superego IMs, and my creative. Sort of interested in my demonstrative as well. Don't want to theorize any more about my base or superid functions. Don't really care about my ignoring function, though it would be useful to understand it better.

[krieger]

So you're more Beta than Alpha. Is that what you're saying?

[Mattie]

If this is a day to day thing, then my type should tell you... Other than I don't think about what IEs I need, that's kinda strange. As for theoretically, I'd like to explore , , and more. I feel like I have a stronger handle on the rest.

[Crispy]

If I interpreted the question right (interest = wanting to learn more about) I'd say I'm most interested in Ne and least interested in Fi.

[krieger]

Se and Ti, for these are the tools by means of which society shall be rid of crime and evil, so that all may live under the watchful jurisdiction of the law and thus be free.

[Eldanen]

Mostly the introverted perceiving elements.

[Galen]

Ni and Si, the nature of field dynamics is still kind of fuzzy to me.

[Creepy-male]

Ti. Funnily enough, also in the Myers-Briggs sense as well.

EDIT

This is limiting it down to my #1 information aspect of conscious interest and application. Perhaps because it encompasses, or at least is present within, activities I find engaging and suitable for giving my mind a rest by giving it something to focus on, which is something I highly prize. Sort of like sitting down after you've been standing up for an uncomfortably long period of time.

[Crispy]

I'm the most interested in . It consumes my daily life, I'd say. I'm also rather interested in paired with .

I lol'd.

[tcaudilllg]

How about this: when the conversation turns to something very complicated and you're not sure you can understand what is being discussed, which element do you try to change the subject towards?

[anndelise]

How about this: when the conversation turns to something very complicated and you're not sure you can understand what is being discussed, which element do you try to change the subject towards?

For me, I'm pretty sure that I try to change it towards internal statics and/or combined with external dynamics. Conversations concerning these things would be my most preferred.

I would prefer to know what a person was responding to, what that response(s) was, and what actions may have led to that response...and what responses may have led to that action. I feel no need to communicate that understanding to others. But I do want it for myself. I crave it, one might say. (But then, in this home/area, I'm quite socially isolated, so "crave" is definitely decently sane by this time.)

I am also making attempts at some fundamental changes at home. If some poor pioneer happened to stumble upon our little home, I'd probably also bombard him/her with tons of questions about how to do some things, what to look out for, how to choose, etc. These questions, combined with how they got here, why they were out roaming, would they want to go back home, and does anyone know where they are at?

Needless to say, by now, if I actually was able to get into a conversation with a flesh and blood person other than my family, they'd probably be running away screaming. (the person, not my family, they're stuck with me, muhahahaah)

[shakealittle]

Ni for sure.

[Beautiful sky]

Te and Ne

[DirectorAbbie]

I'm more interested in the introverted functions because they're harder to pinpoint.

[The Exception]

How about this: when the conversation turns to something very complicated and you're not sure you can understand what is being discussed, which element do you try to change the subject towards?

Easy, .