Top Secret: Marista File

[somavision]

I cannot say how I obtained this document, what I can say is that many brave men and women gave their lives so that we can read it today. What follows is a complete and unabridged copy of Minde's Top Secret Martisa33 File.

Maritsa was born Dave Montgomery Delanougier on 23rd Novemeber 1958. Her conception and birth took place in the small town of Dogging situated within the vast and unforgiving Canadian outback. Her parents were prospectors of unknown origin, although her father was said to sport the finest moustache in the province, leading some to speculate that he was Belgian and possibly even an exiled Wallonian Nationalist.
Maritsa's mother was known by most as a gentle soul, although she had a tendancy to disembowel live cats when angered. This was a source of much mirth for her fellow bloodthirsty Canadians.
Marista changed her name to Maritsa from Dave after emigrating to the US, when it emerged that Dave is usually considered a name for boys in that country. The 33 was added as a nickname, whilst in jail, for her profiency and skill in the notorious lesbian sexual position of the same name.
Since leaving jail, Maritsa33 has succesfully reintegrated herself into society and for some reason beyond her understanding, feels an incredible need to protect and nurture cats.
She is also really good at socionics and 33ing

[Park]

[Absurd]

Dave. That's a nice name.

[Suz]

She just keeps adding more of my words to her dictionary like inclusionary and exclusionary, that I use all the time; this sucks.

Gilly, just erase my messages so she won't see them please.

[UDP]

Sometimes it's better to not wonder or ask ; reason has its limits.

[Park]

Sometimes it's better to not wonder or ask ; reason has its limits.

Haha, precisely.

[Suz]

didn't you see that minde copied my words?

big deal. . .even if she did.

[Beautiful sky]

big deal. . .even if she did.

I hate it when people can't be individuals all on to themselves.

[Slacker]

I understand why that would be frustrating, but as i said in that thread, Maritsa, I'm quite sure she has you on ignore, and if that's the case she wouldn't have been able to copy what you said as no one had quoted you at that point. It's possible she just happened to say something very similar. It wasn't anything ground breaking or unusual, and that same idea, including the words "exclusion adn inclusion" made sense and could easily have been thought of by two different people independently.

[Suz]

I understand why that would be frustrating, but as i said in that thread, Maritsa, I'm quite sure she has you on ignore, and if that's the case she wouldn't have been able to copy what you said as no one had quoted you at that point. It's possible she just happened to say something very similar. It wasn't anything ground breaking or unusual, and that same idea, including the words "exclusion adn inclusion" made sense and could easily have been thought of by two different people independently.

yeah especially if you are indeed identicals who tend to process thought in similar ways.

(i mean Maritsa and Minde)

[Slacker]

Even two people of different types, and even if she's right about what she thinks the types are, two different Fi-leading types, could have come up with a similar statement, both involving the words "exclusion" and "inclusion". It doesn't even rely on them being the same type.

[Minde]

big deal. . .even if she did.

The only time I've copied her words has been when quoting her. She's saying total untruths here, either lying or delusional. I have no reason or desire to imitate her. Why in the world would I?

What I say is what I think and feel.

(I wish this were obvious enough that I didn't have to say it.)

[Beautiful sky]

I understand why that would be frustrating, but as i said in that thread, Maritsa, I'm quite sure she has you on ignore, and if that's the case she wouldn't have been able to copy what you said as no one had quoted you at that point. It's possible she just happened to say something very similar. It wasn't anything ground breaking or unusual, and that same idea, including the words "exclusion adn inclusion" made sense and could easily have been thought of by two different people independently.

Yeah, but why didn't she use these words before I did?

[Slacker]

Yeah, but why didn't she use these words before I did?

Because she happend to reply after you? Just timing. Sometimes people just have similar things to say.

[Slacker]

Fine, I pointed it out this time and I will let it go, but I better not see it again, or I will get pissed off again.

What sucks though is that she used it in the same context as I did which implied that I don't exclude people.

I can see why it seems too similar to be a coincidence to you, based on what all has gone on around here lately. I think your perspective is a bit skewed just because of recent history. It doesn't look like much of a coincidence at all to me. Almost all of us said we wouldn't exclude people, and the words "exclusion" and "inclusion" are really obvious words to be used when talking about letting someone into a group or not. I really don't think she was copying you. I think she probably just had a similar response to the question. It isn't uncommon for two people to respond to something in a very similar way, and it would make sense if you were the same type, if you were different fi-leading types, in this circumstance I think it could make sense even if you were quite different types. I don't think you should read too much into it.

[Beautiful sky]

I can see why it seems too similar to be a coincidence to you, based on what all has gone on around here lately. I think your perspective is a bit skewed just because of recent history. It doesn't look like much of a coincidence at all to me. Almost all of us said we wouldn't exclude people, and the words "exclusion" and "inclusion" are really obvious words to be used when talking about letting someone into a group or not. I really don't think she was copying you. I think she probably just had a similar response to the question. It isn't uncommon for two people to respond to something in a very similar way, and it would make sense if you were the same type, if you were different fi-leading types, in this circumstance I think it could make sense even if you were quite different types. I don't think you should read too much into it.

Thanks.

[Suz]

The only time I've copied her words has been when quoting her. She's saying total untruths here, either lying or delusional. I have no reason or desire to imitate her. Why in the world would I?

What I say is what I think and feel.

(I wish this were obvious enough that I didn't have to say it.)

Her paranoid behavior is obvious Minde, dont worry. I was just covering all bases with Maritsa, to put the issue to rest.

[Absurd]

I see how this is supposed to be a joke but really its mean. ish

No shit

Bad, bad somavision. You're going to burn in hell.

[Marie84]

What does 'no shit' mean?

"obviously" or "duh!"

example:
person 1 "The sky is blue"
person 2 "no shit"

[Suz]

OOoo I got it! haha
Often times I have to look up slang from urban dictionary. Although as one of my friends put it: "oh, i think with every email we fall further into a pool of miscommunication. . .oops haha i find it quite amusing that you had to use urban dictionary, albeit run it by on urban dictionary might have ahd a different definition than i had intended.
run it by= pass it on to"

feh!

And then another instance in which i used urban dictionary for my slang necesities was when my classmate said: "let's get it on"

What did you say to that?

[somavision]

I see how this is supposed to be a joke but really its mean. ish

yeah. ish

No shit

Bad, bad somavision. You're going to burn in hell.

you and me together padre.