I don't know who's the saddest - the person who created this thread or the people who are actually engaging in it in a serious fashion.
I don't know who's the saddest - the person who created this thread or the people who are actually engaging in it in a serious fashion.
I don't care if it's pathetic. I'm fed up with her. Put your nose up all you want. If you repeatedly told her she was full of shit, and she still kept talking about your special kinship when there obviously was none, maybe you'd get fed up with it too. Or maybe not, but I don't care. I hate this emotional manipulation and I've had enough of it.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Maritsa, I noticed that you tend to type some forum members whom I thought are Delta types as Alpha ones e.g. Minde and myself. However, some of the justifications you usually gave for typing someone are not very logical.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
I'll give you food for thought: how sane is a person if he spends a lot of his time making lists like these:
User:Aestrivex/relmat/cyclops - WSWiki
Niffweed is pathetic and misanthropic, and it is common knowledge that he types everyone he doesn't like as Beta.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
ILE like Blaze do it in a different fashion. The marshal resources to one effective stabilization method. You will notice that in a "critical" situation; she opened a thread and the aim or goal of the thread was to indirectly break up what was going on. The method that ILE employs in the situation is very effective.
SEE works within threads.
ILE in action here:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...heir-type.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
An INFj, is non confrontational in person: here's your post; confronting someone? How does that match up with INFj? It does not...sorry, that's not in my character and that's not INFj.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/646178-post34.html
I keep pointing to all of my findings of you not being INFj and yet you seem to have settled in quite comfortably in INFj type...also, why do you and minde put brackets around your signature?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm glad Maritsa and I have so much kinship between ourselves
It's like I'm instantly connected.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Maritsa gets me going then eventually tires me out, therefore = activator.
I try to be very conscious about my approach with other ILE, because I know, it's not fair that I am EII and that I can supervise them and make their lives a living hell, on the forum, most especially; I want the same in return, but so far, I have gotten it from some very healthy SEE like Dolphin and Glamourama, not from the certain others.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 05-03-2010 at 07:00 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You said "You will notice that in a 'critical" situation". I didn't and I don't, your whole remark is just too vague to be of any meaning.
Oh, what was the aim and the intention of Blaze?
You are really assuming a lot about other people. Moreover, you are exclusively claiming behaviors for yourself, probably because you think you are so damn special and unique. In reality, most of us here practice typing the way you described just now. You instead, take a picture, draw a few randomly chosen lines on that picture, and then come up with a type. One day you're saying this, the other you're saying the opposite.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Is Ridella here ?
oh hai thar, I'm eii, kthxbai.
If this is the case - what are you doing here on a public forum? You are obviously not in your element (if you are EII). What's worse, you are parading around your photos like some 'look at me, I'm a fox' model. You are either extremely stressed to the point of losing it, or, you are being dishonest with yourself and other members - you are a EII wannabe, pretending when in fact you are and loving every fucking drop of drama. To be honest, I'm actually considering you might be SEE for all of the attention whoring you do. I'm starting to think you might in fact be base and in denial. You have some fascination with that goes beyond any plr fixation.
In any case, if it's the former, I recommend you take a break from 16types - a week or month long break and regroup. Come back refreshed with a better, more cooperative strategy for discussing socionics in a congenial manner. Or, leave entirely and create your own board as I've already recommended. See if you can recruit someone on the board to help you with the technical elements. In any case, the atmosphere will not get any better for you should you continue along these lines. No amount of new threads about "Maritsa is really EII - LOOK AT ME!", or continuous rationalizations made of fluff logic will change it.
TAKE A BREAK - go out and convene with nature on a week long excursion in the Arizona desert. Meditate. Center yourself and find some peace. You are obviously not going to find peace here in a public forum.
I wonder what would happen if we all agreed to agree with Maritsa for a week.
eg, would she somehow get more controversial or disappear.
I tried laying off, and she got more and more emotionally manipulative. Saying how we're friends when I have not acted that way at all, and how we're a pair, and get along so well, and sending me PMs about how maybe I should advise people because they're my duals (when they state clearly in the thread that they are not.) I'm tired of all that garbage and I want it to end. And even if the fighting doesn't stop her bullshit, it will at least stop that. I feel pretty confident she won't act like we're buddies anymore.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Maritsa, you forgot to answer something
As I asked before...
I do think there is something strange about going around and typing other people and trying to influence them to be something else. Would you like to see those kind of things stopped?She's just going around typing other SEE, INFj and it makes me puke. Like so suddenly every SEE is INFj; then I see it comming; they all end up in Delta quad where Se is the biggest threat to my emotional welbeing, that just seems to work so well for you. If that doesn't fell like a threat to you then I don't know what is.
Pancakes anyone?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
blueberry syrup... I love that stuff.
I want people to be who they are, I truly do; but, I feel that this is not the place where I can honestly ask other individuals to stick up for me when I need it, neither is it a place where I can ask people who have Se leading to be considerate about their approach towards me because, they themselves feel like they are not that kind. I have to honestly say that I see all of these things intermixing and I really don't know what the right thing is.
I just feel frustrated.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This I made for Maritsa
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Then leave. Personally, I think you are repressing your and projecting it onto others. You are not seeing other members as they truly are. There is no point in staying here until such time as you can face this and own up to that part in you. Take a break and think about it.
this is for Mariella
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Marie's prolly not here, but these are specially for her
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Anytime, dear.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I'm a female, and I'm not SEE. You've re-typed me about 5 times, so, you obviously have no clue what type I am. None of your techniques, methodologies and your knowledge work. You choose SEE for anyone who disagrees with you. It's the equivalent of holding your breath until you pass out, when you don 't get your way. If I were SEE, you can be damn sure, I wouldn't be wasting my time babbling on the internet for hours about socionics. Think about this Maritsa. Your multitude of SEE typings make no sense. For the most part, SEEs prefer to ENGAGE WITH THE EXTERNAL WORLD, not on the internet discussing abstract concepts with people that they can't see. And surely, do you honestly think they would prefer to waste time annoying YOU.
I'm strongly recommending you take a break. Eventually, I know you will. It's just a question of time. And, when you return, if you do, you'll understand why I've recommended the break.
?? This doesn't make sense. How can you be mean to me by saying no? You'll agree or disagree. And, obviously, you'll choose to stay or go. To be honest, though, you need a break. Hopefully sooner, than later. But, you'll come to this conclusion on your own terms. I've said all that I can say.
Then shouldn't it have a public answer?
So yes, my question is:
don't you think it would be wise to not antagonize the people who you see as being "mean Se in ego" people?
I want you to answer the question.
don't you think it would be wise to not antagonize the people who you see as being "mean Se in ego" people?