Martisa, in her infininte wisdom, believes that I am SEI, I assume because I think she's an idiot and she thinks she'd get along with IEEs as she thinks IEE is her mirror.
So please vote.
IEE
SEI
something else
Am I, Mariella (aka Slacker Mom) SEI?
Martisa, in her infininte wisdom, believes that I am SEI, I assume because I think she's an idiot and she thinks she'd get along with IEEs as she thinks IEE is her mirror.
So please vote.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
IEE is my mirror not my dual, you can't think?Originally Posted by Mariella
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh typo, thanks.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
You are the only hope for Slacker Dad. You must be IEE.
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
I've read a lot of your posts and threads etc. including unforced descriptions of yourself and your family. I would be very, very surprised if you were not IEE.
IEE-Ne
Why are you opening a pole so that others can vote on your type?
Can't you proove your own type to others?
Does mass opinion about your type matter?
Show me an example where you use Ne?
How does your Si dual seeking manifest?
How does your Ti PoLR manifest?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I am not really concerned about proving anything to you. You can search my username and read my old posts if you want. I want to see if anyone who knows me better agrees with you.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
"My sister (EII) always calls me the morning of anything to see if I'm still planning to do something. And at that point, if I say I'm planning to go and I can't, I do call, because a plan the day of is more set than a plan a week before. But this library thing was a week before, and really anything can happen in a week. I can be pretty sure about something like a doctor's appointment, but a storytime at the library? I'm not promising about that.
Funny how both issues involved libraries."
This is one of your posts....
That's Ne...
So you can remove your pole. But, you still don't see what I see, that Minde is not EII. Why don't you try being objective about that and look at her posts? I looked at yours here for the first time and look what I found!!!.
Here's Tereg to start with, if you will...
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...hread-2-a.html
Would you like me to show you how we are mirrors?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I haven't had any reason to doubt that you're ENFp.
Really, I'm not nearly as into typing people as you are. I don't feel a need to do this objective classification. That's why I've stopped typing you. It doesn't really matter. A lot of people here probably have the wrong types listed, and it'll probably always be that way.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Why don't we stop with this proof thing.
We all know that maritsa isn't very good at typing. Her VI methods might even be true, but she doesn't apply them well. Also anyone who's so extremely convinced of her accuracy, must have no clue as to how easy it is to make mistakes.
As the saying goes: people who say they know all the answers, probably haven't understood the questions.
ps I'm not trolling you maritsa, your knowledge of IM etc is at times very interesting, but your typing isn't as flawless as you assume.
No, You are IEE; I saw it from your post but you didn't see me. why?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There are a lot of possible reasons. Maybe you aren't EII. Maybe you are but you're mentally unstable and that's affecting your behavior here. Maybe you are but you're under a lot of stress because people have been after you and that's affecting your behavior here. But, honestly, my vote is with you not actually being EII.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Based on my interaction with you I could see SEI. You seemed primarily laid back with little inclination towards an argumented debate. You were quite content to just discus the possibility of various options and leave the rational deliberation behind them me. You seemed in general an irrational ethical type with
slackermom=IEE
IEI-Fe 4w3
I keep saying to you that I am. I am not mentally unstable; the only thing affecting my behavior is Se...from the forum members.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Very interesting, what do you think about me?Based on my interaction with you I could see SEI. You seemed primarily laid back with little inclination towards an argumented debate. You were quite content to just discus the possibility of various options and leave the rational deliberation behind them me. You seemed in general an irrational ethical type with
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think you should stop blaming everyone else and take some responsiblity over your own conduct.
Ceci n'est pas une eii.
This guy that you quote is Se/Ni.
You say you are over and over and over again, but saying it doesn't make it so, and saying it more doesn't make it more so. Whether it is true is independent of your belief or how often you talk about it.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Well you seem to keep saying same thing, just saying
really!
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She has asked me about this a few times, and I don't want to ignore her or not answer.Well you seem to keep saying same thing, just saying
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Did you not read one of my posts a long time ago when I connected three examples together and said what you say, which is
"Funny, how things work."
Ne works like this; I tried to find my post, but could not because my log is only 500 posts...this was maybe a few months ago.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-16-2010 at 09:50 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I look for overall trends, not at one specific instance.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Yes because of the reverse
Ne Fi
but I look for specifics that tie to overall, try to understand that...
that's FiNe
please write something for me to know that you are thinking about this.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-16-2010 at 08:48 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have no idea. I don't visit this place often and I haven't kept track of it for a long time. I basically have little to no idea about the new members here from when I lost interest in this place, yourself included.
Good, then you will have a fresh perspective; I studies socionics from Rod Novichkov, Antona Volkova (a PhD Sociologist from Moscow, Russia) and Olga (I have no permission to use her last name, so I will not). I have been typed independently only by VI from them as INFj. You can ask whatever questions you have to determine or examine my type if you would like.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What gives you the idea that I will help you figure out your type?
I asked. I already know what my type is.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That of what use would my perspective be, why ask for it in the first place?
Alright, then I won't, by the way, you are Ni but of which one? You are INFp?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
According to most people's opinion I think. At least the last time I checked.
Actually, having people see me as an SEI is a huge compliment, IMO. I am very fond of SEIs.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
From what I have read from you Mariella, Ne usage stands out. So yeah, IEE
Yes, and you could get along famously with them because of Si.
I am fond of ESE...that's an interesting connection
You Delta ENFp with Alpha ISFp
and me Delta INFj with Alpha ESFj....do you see it?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
same here, when people were questioning me as SEI.Even though I know I'm not.
IEI-Fe 4w3
I too would be surprised if you are not IEE. I haven't really interacted enough with you to be particularly confident in this typing, but as I said, I would be surprised if you were not IEE.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
Hm, aren't you one of those "benchmark" ENFps? Delta at the least, NF, perhaps IJ-ish at times but not really, Fi > Fe, Ne > Ni, you like Si way more than Se, etc.
Yeah, you're pretty much one of the most un-questionably typed people here.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
You've always seemed very IEE to me. See no reason to change your self-typing.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
