How do you think they go? Initial attraction I guess but then what?
Specifically, how do you think a relationship between two SEEs would go?
Identical relations: ESFp and ESFp
How do you think they go? Initial attraction I guess but then what?
Specifically, how do you think a relationship between two SEEs would go?
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
wow, 2 SEE's could be good.
identities are fun...they see things exactly the way you do. i know may ILE friends, male and female. sometimes though when they do stupid stuff that you do too, it's kinda like *ouch* i do that too. it can get competitive if you dont' share the territory....but to me identity relations are pretty good as friends. don't think i'd like to be in a romantic relation with another ILE though.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
horribly
identical relations for aggressors is a recipe for doom
possibly not including LSI
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
Or ESI or... basically anyone who has something to do besides fight each other.Originally Posted by thePirate
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
which agressors dont
minus possibly LSI
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
I know two SEE couples. My aunt and uncle, happy married for 30 years.
Two colleague's. He was a big cheater with other girlfriends but is a good boy now.
So I think based on my small experience that SEE identical relationship is pretty good.
I would expect something like aixelsyd said. I would probably get bored or too competitive with another ESI. For some reason I would have a difficult time seeing two SEEs stick it out for the long whole, but it's definitely not impossible. I would see their flakiness/random dislike as bothering one another once they got over the infatuation stage.
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
Fight other people?
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
John Travolta and his wife are identical type couple; they make a good match because it's like having your twin around; they will do much of the same things together and have mutual understanding, but they should try to concentrate on different careers or goals so that the relationship does not become competitive and boring, also, they should take turns assuming dual roles so that they relationship will have a balance.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
John Travolta is SEE ?
the exception not the rule
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
Yes he is; morphologically he and his wife are both SEE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I disagree. They're just really really competitive. About everything.
Stan is not my real name.
An identical relationship would be boring. You have what they can give you, and you have nothing they need. Forgive me for typing this, but it seems as pointless as homosexuality.
What? how can you see homosexuality as pointless?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What does it matter now? It's clear that both cases are possible.
Homosexuals don't reproduce. Doesn't that rather defeat the purpose of sex?
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
And an identical relationship can have kids.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
The question wasnt if it was possible you Ne hooligan
The question was how did we think it would go, I interpreted this question as a general inquiry into SEE identical relations. To say that they would, on the whole and average, fare well is more than an overstatement. If you take realistic people and not some ideal into account you can see this relationship between this particular type would not be something advisable.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
