For those of you who have read my posts when I was a regular contributor to this forum, you would have prolly known my type. Anyway, I would still like to know your opinion in terms of VI.
For those of you who have read my posts when I was a regular contributor to this forum, you would have prolly known my type. Anyway, I would still like to know your opinion in terms of VI.
Last edited by eunice; 04-20-2010 at 04:59 PM.
You look very much like ESE/ ESFj; would you be able to post a side picture of you with your hair back please?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
How is the body posture related to type?
I would guess EII. Body language is closed, arms held close to the body, more common of introverts. You're smiling in every picture, showing teeth in most, which makes me think ethical. I'm not sure where I'm getting the Delta vibe from, but like VixenDogFox, I am getting that vibe. Assuming all that is correct, the inevitable conclusion is EII. I'd say I have about 70% confidence in that assessment. If not EII, then I don't think it would be far off from that.
Quaero Veritas.
Ni-EIE or Si-ESE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Yup, I have typed myself as Delta, specifically Ne-EII.
Besides Marista, someone else mentioned that I look Si-ESE before.
Here are the other alternative types which others have suggested before: LII, SEI, IEI.
I feel very strongly that you are alpha SF
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I would have guessed IEI
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Yayy eunice!!~~~~
Yeah, eunice is kind of hot.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes and fantabulous!!!
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Coosing somthing that make her feel good.
" I like because it makes me feel good" SiFe
I, INFj, coose my avatar of my picture because it displays good character to initiate contact with someone on a personal/moral level and open possibilities of personal communiction....FiNe
Why do you choose your avatar?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think some would prefer not to put their own picture as the avatar due to privacy since this is a public forum, irregardless of their type.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
As for my opinion, I would have initially thought you V.I like ESE. but that's becuase you seem to display a Ne/Si vibe. I can see EII in those picture, becuase looking at it more and more I can contemplate how it would be if someone like me interact with you in real life.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
yes you have, multiple times.
the ed norton vs arnold schwarzenneger thread is a good example
is it easier for you to hide instead of admitting your wrong
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
My duals love to play superhero roles like the Hulk (Norton), and Terminator (Arnold), and XMen Wolverine (Hugh Jackman). Ask Ryu, he'll tell you.
Norton even looks a little like Ryu?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh Suzzy, what will I do?
Ok Norton is J because his head leans 4 inches before his chest.
Brad Pitt is a P you can see that his posture is upright and his trachea is all the way back. If Norton was to try to have his head up strait his trachea would suffocate and he would have a hard time breathing because of the postioning of it, that's just under his chin. In that case, the best thing that Norton can do is to lean his forhead back so that his chin will be raise up and he can breath.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
that means nothing, neither does him playing superhero roles. I dont need to ask RYU, I have watched plenty of edward norton movies. your evidence is still insufficient and faulty; and apparently suzzy says your misapplying your own methods. socionics was not based on this, do you not understand?
arnold and edward norton could not possibly be the same type. I dont care about your morphological methods, and frankly your socionical analysis leave much to be desired. you are still an amateur, although I hesitate to call you that because you honestly know close to nothing.
Why is it that when I give you contrary information; a real analysis, your only defense is morphology? you havent proven that theres a correlation to type yet; in fact you have alienated people because of how ridiculous the corelations you have made are. am I wrong?
please give me a socionical analysis; I do not wish to hear about morphology when speaking with you on the subject.
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
Removed at User Request
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I can't tell what your type is by the photo Eunice, but I think you're cute .
I've always assumed eunice was an IEI. As for VI, it's obvious it doesn't really work. By the way, can we all, once again, tell Maritsa to shut up. She is highly annoying and stupid. Stop speaking with her, you're ruining everything and putting her ignored comments onto my screen.