These are both unposed shots.
These are both unposed shots.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Another one!
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
INTp or ENTp, my first is INTp (60% sure of this)
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-31-2010 at 03:56 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
she looks very much like a female LSI I know. Facial expressions, even facial structure/shape.
IEI-Fe 4w3
ILI is an interesting suggestion. All I know is that she's definitely a logical type, and Se/Ni valuing.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I would say IJ, not LII; EII or ESI were my first impressions. Best guess: Fi-ESI.
The only IJ intuitive Se/Ni valuer is... *drumroll* ...wait, there isn't one.
I'll vote for LSI.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
and just because there's a picture of someone looking off into space, doesn't necessarily mean they're intuitive. just sayin.
IEI-Fe 4w3
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Se creative methinks.
The end is nigh
ESFp or ESTj
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html