thanks
VI some people I know!
thanks
Last edited by matilda; 03-24-2010 at 04:27 PM.
anyoneeee?
I don't see any pictures sweetheart.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
IEI maybe?Originally Posted by matilda
IEE-Ne
put them up again. sorry bout that.
Removed at User Request
I'm A
you may be right about F and E.
First picture, on the right may be either INFj or INFp; center girl ExTx is all I can see; to the right INFj or INFp or ISFp (but not very likely),
Second picture boys are both ISTp; girl in green may be INTp the other look ISFp (if these are the same girls as above then you need to tell me)
Third picture, girl on the right ISTp (most likely)
Last picture, the boy standing next to the girl is ISTp; one next to him may be ESFp, the boy sitting is ISTp; the girl, standing is ISTp
I may have typed two for each because one, the pictures are not VI pictures (these have to be individual and taken from the side as well) and two, one picture may show more of the details of the face that I am looking for then the other.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-23-2010 at 12:33 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Removed at User Request
I would consider three types for A. ISFp, INFp or INFj...do you have a side pic of you?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Close! I've typed Girl "C" as SEE.
I've considered SEI, IEE, and IEI for me. so yeah
hmm. what would be the differences?
I may consider C to also be ESTj or ISTp
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-23-2010 at 05:04 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reply With Quote
