Emma Stone
I'll say EP and TI/Fe quadra , so SLE first guess, then ILE, then IEE, then SEE.
Maybe the same type as Jonah Hill. Also whats the type of ALL the people in this movie...(Zombieland)
Last edited by jughead; 03-13-2010 at 06:29 PM.
Removed at User Request
ESFP
ESTP(?)
Bump.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I see her as a typical SLE. When she speaks she is inclined to use affirmative intonations and because of that she is often perceived as confident or as categorical. That shows strongas a basic function.
I find her self-presentation and focus to be magnetic and appealing in a her-Se-complements-my-Ni sort of way, and I have a lot of respect for her (prolly her use of Ti). That's how I feel about my SLE best female friend. I would agree with SLE
very SLE; same type as her mom, you may observe from the interview.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She's cool stuff, I like her. Definitely EP temperament.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Lindsay Lohan-esque. Se primary.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
What everybody else said. Se-ESXp, beta > gamma.
se for sure
ep>ij
gamma>beta
SEE/esfp
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
OMG she's SO different from what I expected. WHAT THE FUCK!?!?
She's SO harsh, her voice is sooo raspy and low. Damn gurl. Yes Se dominant but I dunno she seems pretty unappealing to me for some reason. I don't see myself getting along with her :S It's really weird... She has such a cute little face and then she speaks.
I originally guessed ESTp, but after watching some interviews I'm kinda not feeling the Se vibes anymore. Dunno, Merry quadra yeah. Maybe not even Beta.
The end is nigh
From her interview I would guess ENTp, one of the sle-like ENTps with beta-vibes, by enneagram somewhere around types 6/7. I don't think she is a Se-ego but rather mimics well (or at least what's stereotypically considered to be Se). Evolutionary flow of thought in her speech that only two EP types have, ENTp and ESFp, but not ESTp.
INFj/EII
I don't think Superbad is going to demonstrate how she actually is.
Watch The Help and you'll see a completely different side to her.
SEE>SLE
I don't see logics. Si-ESFj is my impression.
bump
She reminds me a lot of this Beta ST girl I knew in high school. So, that, I guess.
Fe Hidden Agenda, Fi-POLR. When interacting with others she seems to be scanning for expressed emotional validation.
I would say she seems somewhat more like an ENTp than ESTp just first from the fact that she seems like she has problems with sensing her body and manipulating her body as well. Awkward movements. Seems like she's drifting away a bit even when speaking as well. Seems like she would appreciate a caretaker in many ways. Garfield seems like an Alpha. ESTp would be my second guess for her.
Suomea
IEE e2w3 so/sp
my vague impression after watching birdman was SLE, which the letterman interview seemed to confirm. an Ne-dominant would demonstrate a greater amenability to his purposely trite antics, exploring the ideational terrain to color things at intervals... she just responds directly and with a distant tactical awareness that maintains a dissonant background for the interaction (i.e. "do you have something that I could look at"). probably a 3 as well, she has a certain implicit professionalism that goes beyond what every actor should possess and a mild detachment that resonates with competency+assertive imo. ILE would be a distant second guess.
4w3-5w6-8w7
IEE. (sure she is ExFx)
My vote's for ILE.
maybe ILE, SLE
The actress Emma Stone said that she's really awkward and shy off camera, but that she turns into this amazingly extroverted, bubbly character when she's on camera.
IEI
They all are, they all play an IMAGINATIVE role with Ni which isn't how they really are off screen
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
'extroverted and bubbly' on camera might indicate a certain inclination for the bright and the extreme, as there's not prescription for a Ni lead to become ALWAYS that if they're only playing a role and one goes by the theory that Ni types can embody any role. If it's movies we're talking about.
(teachers can also transform in front of a class to appear more like their idea of a competent, interesed and sociable person, they also live in something of role and they're not all IEI)
Last edited by Rusal; 02-16-2023 at 08:26 AM.
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
A questionable take that makes it seem you can't grasp the general inner workings of people and take that baggage to typing.
There's no need for the case of Emma Stone and her bubbliness to be an 'imaginative role' derived from Ni.
You know teachers, the people that deal with 30+ students even when they might not feel like it?
An LSI professor might slip into a role of what needs to be done in the classroom, how to present themselves to make a better connection, impose more authority on students, etc. It's just another side of themselves.
An ESE kindergarten teacher can become really, really lively in front of 4 year old kids when she's more neurotic and serious in a group of adults. She can also create on-the-spot twists to her puppets shows and she introduces the voices of new characters. Her 'role' and her 'imaginative' playfulness are what she's paid for.
We could be very well be seeing Emma showing a different shade of herself as the ESE teacher of my example. You don't need 'IMAGINATIVE role with Ni' to achieve that.
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
LSE (Fe role)
SLI
Ethical + Sensory. ESE
Google Jane Levy. looks like a carbon copy of Emma Stone. IEI-C anyway
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
I liked her in that movie with Colin Firth.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Black & white is a shallow divide, division is the color that multiplies
Taking things at face value is good only for a spell
To experience is simple, to explain is divine
Hearts of stone are a dead giveaway: no movement
maybe C-ESI-Se
EIE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote