Originally Posted by
buckland
Your perception of yourself as an ideologist is slightly misguided though. You do this to receive acclaim, it does not seem like you actually enjoy the actual process, creating ideas for their own sake.
You are completely wrong. I create ideas (like my DCNH-VI method)
1.) because I like to theorize
2.) because I try to solve problems (like determining DCNH types)
Originally Posted by
buckland
Plus, the number of ideas you throw out does not necessarily correlate with type. Tcaud and yourself especially have a rather misconstrued view of types based on this. The need to be considered intellectuals is distorting your understanding of socionics.
You may be right about tcaud, he has a lot of strange ideas and in many cases he is the only one who understands them and believes in them without reason.
My DCNH-VI idea is not complicated, strange or crazy at all. I just typed many people and discovered an interesting pattern by using the hypothetical DCNH descriptions Krig and I had "developed". These hypothetical DCNH descriptions in combination with the VI pattern I discovered will help all people who are open-minded to increase their typing ability tremendously! I really can't see your problem there...
Originally Posted by
buckland
There's no doubt that in the back of e.g. alpha-NT's minds there is an element of glory-hunting etc, but with you it's a more visible/primary motive. It's the reason that your arguments are so littered with patronizing remarks.
INTj is the most self-confident type when it comes to theory. That's why INTjs may seem to be arrogant or patronizing in this area.
The holy idea of an INTj is truth, not glory-hunting. I theorize because I like to theorize - and to discover useful methods, patterns, facts.
to explore strange new worlds
to seek out new life and new civilizations
to boldly go where no man has gone before
Originally Posted by
buckland
Here's the thing, it's just as easy to tag
as ideologists and
as opportunists.
No, not at all. Here comes my next over-simplification:
Alpha and Beta - to help people and seek the truth (ideologists)
Gamma and Delta - to get along with people and look for profit (opportunists)
Alpha and Delta - to enjoy the moment and think about present possibilities
Beta and Gamma - to achive goals and think about future developments
Why should that be related to idology/opportunism?