Last edited by silke; 07-14-2014 at 11:09 AM. Reason: updated w interviews
I think Christopher Reeves is Fi-INFj.
Reeve - ENTJ
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
look almost nothing alike. reeve does look infj, painful smile fi eyes, Seen that expression alot personally. Some say LSE, i say bs, =EII
So in fact to me EII's come off as painfully strained emotionalism. Like literally they are suffering in pain and I do not like the vibe. Maybe applies only to FI sub or Fi sub men. Socionics.com mentions they have a charicteristic painful ascetic christian suffering monk face. I AGREE
They are IJ. So moreso its the shit that doesnt change enough they will be pared with, and EJs will be with them.EX: like overally stuffy religions and stuff, traditional shit like the uptight frats they make fun of in movies. Beta NF in comparison seems more natural and flowing in their emotion. Different for each type relation.
2 looks smug and feeling superior. i say istj maybe ti estp.
Worst comparison ever. Both their types are fairly established.
Frankly I'm responding to this to warm up my mind.
"overall moods" quite useful for me if using some form of VI. "video" id is petter than static pictures.
Try to line up the vibes you get off people with your own expirience of people you know and how they relate to you to get your own brand of VI/personal interaction knowledge.
Every one of these assertions can be challenged/nitpicked by other forum members who are frankly dumbshits and offer no better solutions.
EII:gentle but with firm principles; demonstrate positive attitude; willingness to share your world
tough, serious, decisive, tough-minded, disciplined, controlling, firm, resolute; mistrustful; stand their ground
forceful; demanding of others; go-getters; not easily intimidated; ready for confrontation
-low hairline (for males)
-sharp, sculpted cheekbones
-high and narrow bridged nose
-angled eyebrows that almost meet at the top of the nose
-deep set, triangle shaped eyes (the outer eyelids are angled downwards)
-'knowing', slightly sad look in the eyes
-medium size bum chin
-very similar pattern of hair growth (just that parting is on opposite sides)
-both have a distinctly blocky, angular look
- Sidis's face more squashed
- Sidis's nose points up slightly
- Reeves's brows have a wider arch
If Reeves was younger in that photo, and his face oriented to the same angle as Sidis's, then the bone structure similarities would become quite obvious, but i think it's the difference in facial expression (as opposed to differences in bone structure) that actually makes them look different.
anyway, i 'm a little doubtful of my initial INFj typing. INTj seems plausible too. his personality, based on bio readings, doesn't really fit the ISTj and ESTp descriptions you posted. there is no indication that he was especially forceful, controlling, mistrustful, tough-minded, demanding of others, etc. he was a social outcast in his time, and spent most of his life as a recluse working menial jobs, the rest of the time writing on various topics (politics, Native American history, transport systems, physics...) under pseudonyms.
Last edited by xixi; 02-22-2010 at 08:59 AM.
Who cares if they look somewhat alike? That's not going to tell you if they're the same personalities or not. That can only be confirmed by Socionics type (aka personality type) not facial type.
Christopher Reeve I think may be an IEE.
well i'm trying to sharpen my VI skills here.
and let me guess, you're an IEE
I am not an ENTp, despite what others may try to have me believe. For ENTp, see users like Vero or Coolanzon.
The other guy: IEE (reminiscent of Ashton Kutcher, BTW)
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
you tried to fool me - that's a pretty ENTp thing to do you know...
you seem too strong in Se to be an INTp...
too weak in Fi to be an ENFp...
'...despite what others may try to have me believe' is also a sentiment i hear most commonly from ENTp's...
but i will suspend judgment till i've gathered more tidbits
I didn't try to fool you. I was being sarcastic in saying I'm an ESE, because I'm an ILI. Sarcasm can't be that difficult to catch onto if I'm using the word sarcastic in the same sentence. Anyway ILE I am not. ILEs are outwardly attentive, energetic, and have values exactly opposite of mine, those most notably Ne: frequent jumping from context to context in creation of new associations. I have been mistyped as ILE by people here before. I am ILI, way too low-energy, meditative, in constant depth and replay of the same mental imagery, lacking in motivation, uncertain, seeking of accurate factual information in an instructive and detailed form from a good source, and if you live with me for a few days you'll realize my Fe-PoLR, most notably that I'm highly disconnected from reading other's emotions and picking up on social cues. I'm everything that an Se-DS ILI is.
I don't believe this back and forth conversation will be leading anywhere constructive.
Last edited by 717495; 02-22-2010 at 12:07 PM.
do all your conversations have to lead somewhere 'constructive'? jk. i guess ILI's don't do banter.
ok then, so what makes you think Reeves is IEE?
Reeve Fi/Te valuing and so/sp
interesting docu on the superman films: