Removed by User Request
Removed by User Request
Last edited by DeleteMePLOX; 01-23-2008 at 11:04 AM.
Vote for Pedro ^_^
Ummm, Allah ... I hate to bring this up, but when I die is it possible to enjoy the company of more than 70 virgins or is that a non-negiotable fixed number?
*Looks at contents of thread*
Ohh crap ... wrong thread ... I thought this was one of those extremeist cult worshipping ones ... me bad I'll burn in hell I guess ...
*votes on his way out ...*
I voted you INFp.
I could definately see her as my Illusionary, so I voted ISFp.
INFp would be my second choice, though.
HI MY NAME'S INFP AND I AM THE ORIGINAL POSTER.
I voted ISFp
I voted ENFP :wink:
is like a wet kiss on the cheek and a warm hug by a cute smiling girl.
is the confetti shots on your birthday party with all your friends.
is a way to completely rip apart the face of god and stare directly at the naked universe.
is like over here and then over there and they are all connected and I am on amphetamine.
You fit into that large catagory (p types included) of people that I probably wouldn't want to spend a lot of time with in real life.
So I'd say.... Ixxp
Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.
Holy crap! Satan gave me a better offer!Originally Posted by ChibiKeba
Where's sycophant ... ? I am starting to miss her ... .
Well, heres the list of types I say you are definatly not:
So we're left with IxFp, and ENxP.
I could see you as an ISFp or INFp. If I HAD to pick I'd day ISFp, but internet typing is a sham.
lol thats awesome.Originally Posted by ChibiKeba
I agree that ENTp is the least likely for you out of all those types.Originally Posted by ChibiKeba
And I've always thought you were probably the ethical subtype of either ISFp or INFp like Rocky explained, makes sense so you are probably not ENFp(but its possible).
Maybe we should start an ISFp vs INFp topic cuz that seems to be one people are having trouble with. Theres already been at least two people on here who had a hard time choosing, and that makes you the third, so Im guessing its a pretty common confusion. What do you think, would that be a good idea?
Oh yeah, almost forgot:
gulenko's subtype descriptions
And it seems you related to ethical ISFp the least, am I right?
Well at least we've narrowed it down to three types. And three subtypes, lol.
Did you could check out the type descriptions on socionics.com and socioniko.net and compare the three types?