lolSeeker of initial (logical)
(Recoverable - from the English. Extractor)
Abstractedly and thoughtful man. His attractive ideas have no direct connection with reality, such as philosophy, religion, bioenergetics and etc. His favorite occupation - a comparison between the different logical systems. Type armchair scientist. It is characterized by an asthenic figure. Sometimes angular movements, not paying attention to appearance, little health care.
Let's see. Most importantly seeming, my intertype relations work with ENTp, but not with INTj. People on here have said I VI as and come off as an ENTp, and some have just said alpha (and especially noted that I look like Archon). Archon, Ashton, Nick, and whoever, used to type me as ENTp for some reason, said it was forum behavior, but as far as I can tell everyone retyped me as INTj because they think I'm niffweed's reincarnate or something. Sexy, if anything.
The above description is vague, however it does fit better than any of the INTj ones. Everything said on it is accurate, and the other descriptions I identify (if only a bit less) with are Ne-INTj and the INTp ones. I think of INTjs as rather rational and logical, where as I'm much more absent minded and thoughful in a sort of whimsical way. I could buy into the fact that Ti is my dominant function, if only it could be explained to me a little better. I'm not really into enneagram, but so far it seems like I'm some kind of 5, or that I come off that way. But it's not set in stone. Other enne-types I have identified with upon first glancing at it were 3, 4, possibly 1 6 and 9. Anyway I don't really know (need to learn it), but if I really am a type 5, I don't see why an Ti-ENTp can't foster it.
Ashton helped type my family and friends through VI and using descriptions, it seems like me as an ENTp would make the most sense in this model or whatever it is. Any arguments?
PS: I'll also add that some people think of me as INTp, and those are the only arguments I've gotten to hear.