The first people that were ever able to sustain themselves were a type of warrior: hunters. In any case, the warrior stage as I see it is a person that lives in constant fear of losing his/her life. No person wishes that kind of fate over themselves. The feudal lords of Japan and Europe were not examples of people in such a state. They were more like Associates. They had turned their military abilities and strength into an institution from which it became a source of wealth and power to them. Many of such people also practiced philosophy and art and people of less fortunate standing were blocked from being able to do them same.The warrior is actually one of the most elevated roles.
The warriors are a result of development. First of all, warrior class can't sustain itself.
You're talking about conditions that are just about universal. Often a person fights for the future promise of having such assests and ideals.The this category has no reason to exist by itself as a base one. It has some requirements: assets, something to defend (many times ideals), something to conquer.
All that this "proves" is that people in the higher stages aren't always recognized as being such. I think the general pattern in any society is that the Associates most look like they are in control of things, because they have the most practical talents that still allow them control on a long term, broad scaled level.Using the examples you saw in the socionics.com thread, let's take the ones of Musashi about medieval Japan, to keep things simple:
- the peasant
- the merchant
- the artisan
- the gentleman warrior
Removed at User Request
Last edited by Pied Piper; 02-07-2010 at 02:00 AM. Reason: removed by request
@ Pinocchio: if you're going to clog things up with wild speculations of your own, make your own thread for it.
Can't beat an ISFp at their own game.I am at the Artist stage. Way above labcoat.
Removed at User Request