Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: (potentially dumb) subtype question

  1. #1
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default (potentially dumb) subtype question

    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  2. #2
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    rather good but difficult question.

    I've haven't read anything about it, so I can only talk from my own small experience on this subject...

    First of all, I don't think it's about 'displaying', rather 'welcoming'.

    IEI-Ni will welcome Se more. IEI-Fe will welcome Ti more.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Saugerties,NY
    TIM
    ENFj-fe
    Posts
    947
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    That sounds about right to me. My mom, who I now believe is SLE-ti exhibits very little Fe but doesn't shy away from it either. The IEI-ni's I know rarely ever show Fe to the point that I confuse them for ILI. And, a friend of mine who is IEI-Fe is extremely pushy with just about everyone she knows.
    EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1


    As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
    Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962

  4. #4
    strrrng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    I think it is correct. Irrationals seem more inclined towards psychological alignment/continuity... so, a natural focus on a field function will relate to its counterpart, to allow for this (i.e. SLE-Ti focusing more on Ni). It's different with rationals, since their psyches seem to be structured in a way that engenders a more polarized focus; you would get an EIE-Ni displaying more Se than Ti. This isn't just based on temperaments though; it factors into quadra progression.

    Example: Betas. J-sub rationals–>J-sub irrationals–>P-sub rationals–>P-sub irrationals

    The shift in functional focus illustrates the movement from alpha to gamma. An Fe-IEI will have a transmission of Fe–>Se, which complements an Se-LSI who transmits Se–>Ni, which in turn compliments Ni-IEI who transmits Ni–>Ti. It's sort of a lengthy process; I might detail it more in Gilly's thread.
    4w3-5w6-8w7

  5. #5
    Currently God Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,246
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    That's how I usually view it, though it varies between subtype systems. With the Model X subtypes, this actually differs between Rational and Irrational types (but really the Model X j/p is like Model A subtypes and vise-versa...).



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  6. #6
    07490's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    there
    Posts
    3,047
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you read all the subtype description and compare them, you can see that each and every type whose subtype is the leading function has a bigger hidden agenda in their description, all of them. it goes with SLE-Ti/SLE-SE, ENFj-Fe/ENFJ-NI. so yes, leading subtype has bigger emphasis on producing their hidden agenda.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.
    I don't know about dual seeking tho.
    (D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    1)
    A girl who I want to date, asks me: well first tell me how tall you are?
    My reply: well I will answer that, if you first tell me how much you weigh!

    2)
    A girl I was dating said she was oh so great at sex etc, but she didn't do blowjobs.
    My reply: Oh I'm really romantic etc, I just will never take you out to dinner.

  7. #7
    misutii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,234
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    Not necessarily.

    Shouldn't be overly dwelt upon though. Instead consider:
    An IEI-Ni will display less attention towards Si than an IEI-Fe
    An IEI-Fe will display less of a desire/need for others to provide Se than an IEI-Ni
    An IEI-Fe will display a stronger vulnerability to Te than an IEI-Ni
    INFp-Ni

  8. #8
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by misutii View Post
    Not necessarily.

    Shouldn't be overly dwelt upon though. Instead consider:
    An IEI-Ni will display less attention towards Si than an IEI-Fe
    An IEI-Fe will display less of a desire/need for others to provide Se than an IEI-Ni
    An IEI-Fe will display a stronger vulnerability to Te than an IEI-Ni
    this sounds right, and with good face validity.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    us
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    Bear with me if this is obvious but I'm just trying to get it straight in my head.

    So if you have an SLE-Ti, they're going to display less Fe than an SLE-Se.

    An IEI-Ni will display less Se than an IEI-Fe.

    Is this correct?
    sounds right to me
    today is a gift, that's why its called the present

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •