Okay, so maybe I'm a bit too clumsy and absentminded and not all that self-disciplined or good at follow through. And maybe the intertype relations don't really make all that much sense.
But hey, why not. I'm bored. Let's give it a shot.
Okay, so maybe I'm a bit too clumsy and absentminded and not all that self-disciplined or good at follow through. And maybe the intertype relations don't really make all that much sense.
But hey, why not. I'm bored. Let's give it a shot.
No
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Your avatar VIs gypsy. How is this relevant?
That sounds just about wrong.trying LSI on for size
Joy, why not give EIE a shot..?
Good question. I do generally relate well to the EJ temperament, after all.
Fe leading just doesn't make any sense for me. I suck at Fe. And Fi. I rarely know how I feel, and I'm far more comfortable relying on what can be objectively qualified and quantified than on subjective feelings or morals. And as I mentioned in my quote above: "Even drunk as described above, however, I'm still generally more pragmatic and logical than most of the people around me. I frequently get weird looks for it. It's the kind of look people give Bones when they think she's being overly rational/logical." People make comments about it, too.
I don't need to be with someone who will help me be rational and objective and logical and pragmatic. I need someone who will be warm and affectionate. Someone who manages the status of the relationship (because I totally and hopelessly suck at that ). Someone who is clear about how they feel... and who knows how I feel... because like I said, I sure as hell don't.
So yeah, for those reasons, the dichotomy that I'm most sure of is logic. After that, I'm most sure that I'm Se/Ni > Ne/Si. And I really doubt I'm ILI (or any other IP). That leaves LIE, SLE, and LSI.
isn't ur dual isfj?
That's been the assumption.
I don't know why but somehow I knew this day would come.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
For the record I think it's a stupid idea.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Typing is a stupid idea.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
For what it's worth, I've always thought you had the writing style of a Static type. ENTjs generally tend to have a far more voluminous, dynamic and "enthusiastic" way of speaking, like the opening poster of this thread:
Youtube: Let's play Civ IV is up! - Civilization Fanatics' Forums
That being said, I'm not sure if calling yourself ISTj will solve more problems than it creates anew.
Yes, thank you for that image. I am pretty much just fucking around.
(Though I do sometimes wonder if I'm not SLE. Until I spend time around the one I work with, lol.)
...or people who accept that placing people in 16 categories by purely theoretical means leaves them with nothing left in common but vaguely recognizable behavioral tendencies that don't say anything of meaning or relevance about them at all, and thereby conclude that it's better to recognize real similarities and attempt to rectify the dissonances that follow from correlating them.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Joy = confused
George = pouting
Seriously though... I'm with you, Gilly.
Psychology's a bitch for 3s
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Joy, you have Si eyes. Or maybe I'm thinking of someone else? Hmm.
You should try ESTj or ESFj.
Oh, I kind of have Si eyes too... hmmm
No chance in hell I'm a Ni PoLR type.
lol, thank you. You're right. Probably. Like I said in my initial post, I was just bored. Or something.
idk
The IJ temperament seems an unlikely fit for me though.
I'm not LIE.
I'm not any type. Socionics is just some fun theory that an old Russian lady came up with. It's not something that should influence my self-image or relationships. I'm going to consciously deprogram my assumptions about my desires, strengths, and weaknesses.
I'm done with this bullshit.
spent
Yeah. I feel like I'm leaving a cult or something.
you are just trying to make socionics less important so that it doesn't feel too bad that you don't know your type.
Why aren't you honest with yourself.
You don't know your type and that sucks. And I don't mean this in a bad way, I hope you'll find your type, and can confirm it with relationships etc. But stop trying to fool yourself.